Effect of Need to Void on Gait Speed in Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT03204747

Last Updated: 2019-07-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

71 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-27

Study Completion Date

2017-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multiple sclerosis causes demyelinating lesions, which can induce multiple symptoms. If motor disorders are the most visible disability, urinary disorders are frequent, with prevalence from 32 to 86%. The first ones are due to pyramidal, cerebellar or proprioceptive lesions. The seconds are due to specific lesion in inhibitor/activator encephalic centers, or interruption on medullary conduction. It seems to be evident that walk and urinary disorders are link, because of similar anatomic ways and control process. Effect of bladder filling is well known on motoneuronal excitability. The effect of bladder filling on walk stay unknown, while medullary integration of these two functions is very close, in medullary cone.

Primary aim is to assess the effect of need to void on walk speed in multiple sclerosis with lower urinary tract symptoms. Secondary aim is to identify clinical or urodynamic factor link with major walk impairment when patients need to void.

Patient with multiple sclerosis over 18 years old, consulting for lower urinary tract symptoms in a tertiary center are included.

History and treatment, high, weigh, symptoms severity by USP score, cognitive impairment by MMSE score and last urodynamic data are recorded. Patient are asked to drink water until they feel a strong need to void, for which they would go to urinate at home.

Walk tests are realized in a specific place, with calm and no passage. A chair is placed at each end of the path. Toilets are just next to the hall where they realize the tests. A 10 Meters Walk Test is done during this condition, 3 times (only the intermediate 6 meters are recorded). They can take 30 seconds of rest between each try if necessary. One Timed up and go is done. Patient can use their habitual walking device. Speed walk asking is comfortable for the two test.

Next, patient can urinate. 3 post void residual volume with portable echography are done, and the higher is recorded.

Patient achieve the same walk tests after urinate, in the same order. They must use the same walking device.

Primary outcome is mean gait recorded for 10 meters walk test.

Secondary outcome is time for timed up and go test.

Individual variability between the 3 10MWT in the two conditions will be study.

Influence of age, EDSS, severity of symptoms, MMSE, detrusor overactivity on speed impairment will be study in secondary analysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Gait

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients enrolled

Patient with multiple sclerosis and lower urinary tract symptoms, age \> 18, able to walk without human help on 50 meters, able to hold urine at least 3 minutes.

A first record of gait will be at strong desire to void. A second record will be after void Gait records consist on : 3 10meter walk test and 1 Timed up and Go test.

Observational study : gait speed

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention, only propose water and wait for need to void

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Observational study : gait speed

No intervention, only propose water and wait for need to void

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Multiple sclerosis
* Follow in neuro-urology for lower urinary tract symtpoms
* Able to walk 50 meters without human assistance
* able to hold on void during 3 minutes at least

Exclusion Criteria

* actual urinary tract infection
* relapse in the last week
* Mini Mental State Examination \< 10
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pierre and Marie Curie University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gérard Amarenco

Head of Neuro-urology department, Tenon hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gérard Amarenco, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

GREEN GRC-01, Neuro-urology, hôpital Tenon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Neuro-urology, hôpital Tenon

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P GREEN 001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.