Point-of-care Urine Monitoring of Adherence: Testing a Real-Time Urine Assay of Tenofovir in PrEP
NCT ID: NCT03935464
Last Updated: 2025-10-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-01
2024-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PrEP Point-of-Care Brief-Intervention for Adherence Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men
NCT05353283
Urine Tenofovir Point-of-care Test to Identify Patients in Need of ART Adherence Support (UTRA Study)
NCT05333679
Kenya HIV Self-Testing in PrEP Delivery
NCT03593629
PrEP for Prevention of HIV Transmission Among People Who Inject Drugs in Nairobi, Kenya
NCT05465265
PrEP4U: Assessing the Effectiveness of Integrated Same-Day Lenacapavir Initiation and Follow-up Choice on PrEP Persistence
NCT07335289
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Feasibility outcome: The investigators will assess the feasibility of the intervention by interviewing health care providers, who will be administering this test at the clinical point of care in the future. The investigators will examine provider perceptions of the assay using in-depth interviews. These key informant interviews will be performed at the end of this study with the healthcare providers (up to 8) who delivered the counseling messages to intervention arm participants after performing the POC urine TFV test. The semi-structured interview guide will draw from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model.200 This model incorporates factors that influence technology acceptance (in this case, of the POC immunoassay): perceived usefulness (performance expectancy), complexity to use (effort expectancy), stigma/social harm (social influence), and benefits (facilitating PrEP adherence among patients). These interviews will also elicit barriers and facilitators to delivering the TFV assay-informed counseling messages.
Acceptability outcome: The investigators will conduct a mixed-methods assessment of the intervention arm participants' experiences with real-time monitoring and feedback at the end of the study. A quantitative survey and a qualitative interview guide for in-depth interviews of participants will draw from the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills (IMB) model.205-212 Quantitative data collection will occur via standardized interviewer-administered questionnaires. Items to be assessed include the following: 1) Feelings about receiving their PrEP adherence results in real time; 2) Likelihood of participating in other studies using a similar design; 3) Likelihood of wanting to receive results of urine testing outside of a study while they are on PrEP; 4) Concern about the privacy and security of the data regarding their urine results; 5) Grading of the potential impact of knowing their urine TFV results on subsequent medication adherence; 6) Advantages and disadvantages of being told about their adherence in real time; 7) Likelihood of taking PrEP just before later study visits because they knew the urine test was being conducted; 8) Preferences regarding a yes/no assay versus an assay that provides information on "high", "moderate" or "low" adherence. A 5-point Likert item format will be used to assess graded items (such as the likelihood of wanting continued urine testing in the context of PrEP; feelings about the urine testing, ranging from negative to positive; concerns about privacy, ranging from low to high; the potential impact of real-time feedback on subsequent adherence, ranging from low to high). Other items (advantages and disadvantages of being told about adherence results) will provide pre-specified options with one "other" option for open-ended text fields.
Adherence outcome: A linear mixed effects linear regression model will estimate the effect of the intervention versus standard-of-care on logarithmically transformed levels of tenofovir in hair.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Arm
POC adherence testing by a urine TFV assay with feedback
PUMA
Collect urine on intervention participants and screen for presence of TFV. Feedback will be provided to the participant based on the results on their adherence with provision of standard adherence counseling.
Standard of Care
Follow Kenya's PrEP guidelines on standard adherence counselling
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PUMA
Collect urine on intervention participants and screen for presence of TFV. Feedback will be provided to the participant based on the results on their adherence with provision of standard adherence counseling.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult, age ≥18 years old
* HIV-1 uninfected based on a negative HIV-1 rapid test
* Not currently enrolled in an HIV-1 prevention clinical trial
* Not currently in a sero-discordant relationship
* Already taking PrEP and will be enrolled at the 3-month follow-up visit following PrEP initiation
* Willing to be randomized to point-of-care tenofovir drug testing
* Willing/able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
* No contraindication to use of TDF or FTC
* Note: Women who are pregnant or breast feeding at screening/enrollment are still eligible
Exclusion Criteria
* under 18 years old
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kenya Medical Research Institute
OTHER
University of Washington
OTHER
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
NIH
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Monica Gandhi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
KEMRI Partners in Health and Research Development (PHRD), Thika
Thika, Near Nairobi, Kenya
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gandhi M, Bacchetti P, Rodrigues WC, Spinelli M, Koss CA, Drain PK, Baeten JM, Mugo NR, Ngure K, Benet LZ, Okochi H, Wang G, Vincent M. Development and Validation of an Immunoassay for Tenofovir in Urine as a Real-Time Metric of Antiretroviral Adherence. EClinicalMedicine. 2018 Aug-Sep;2-3:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Gandhi M, Bacchetti P, Spinelli MA, Okochi H, Baeten JM, Siriprakaisil O, Klinbuayaem V, Rodrigues WC, Wang G, Vincent M, Cressey TR, Drain PK. Brief Report: Validation of a Urine Tenofovir Immunoassay for Adherence Monitoring to PrEP and ART and Establishing the Cutoff for a Point-of-Care Test. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 May 1;81(1):72-77. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001971.
Spinelli MA, Glidden DV, Rodrigues WC, Wang G, Vincent M, Okochi H, Kuncze K, Mehrotra M, Defechereux P, Buchbinder SP, Grant RM, Gandhi M. Low tenofovir level in urine by a novel immunoassay is associated with seroconversion in a preexposure prophylaxis demonstration project. AIDS. 2019 Apr 1;33(5):867-872. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002135.
Okello P, Velloza J, Ogello V, Owidi E, Mogere P, Gakuo S, Chakravarty D, Biwott C, Chatterjee P, Mugo N, Gandhi M, Ngure K. Acceptability and feasibility of a urine-based tenofovir adherence assay for monitoring and providing feedback on PrEP adherence in Kenya. AIDS Care. 2025 Feb;37(2):324-336. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2024.2444556. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
Gandhi M, Glidden DV, Chakravarty D, Wang G, Biwott C, Mogere P, Maina G, Njeru I, Kiptinness C, Okello P, Spinelli MA, Chatterjee P, Velloza J, Ogello V, Medina-Marino A, Okochi H, Mugo NR, Ngure K. Impact of a point-of-care urine tenofovir assay on adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among women in Kenya: a randomised pilot trial. Lancet HIV. 2024 Aug;11(8):e522-e530. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00125-5. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
Drain P, Ngure K, Mugo N, Spinelli M, Chatterjee P, Bacchetti P, Glidden D, Baeten J, Gandhi M. Testing a Real-Time Tenofovir Urine Adherence Assay for Monitoring and Providing Feedback to Preexposure Prophylaxis in Kenya (PUMA): Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 2;9(4):e15029. doi: 10.2196/15029.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.