The RIPPLE AT-PLUS Study

NCT ID: NCT03915691

Last Updated: 2025-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

201 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-16

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Atrial tachycardia is a symptomatic arrhythmia, for which an effective treatment is a catheter ablation procedure. The goal of the Ripple AT-Plus study is to evaluate two methods of performing catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia. The main outcome assessed during the study is long-term recurrence of atrial tachycardia following the catheter ablation procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Catheter based mapping of the electrical signals in the heart during atrial tachycardia can identify areas that require ablation in order to treat the arrhythmia. There are numerous methods by which to map atrial tachycardia. Isthmus guided ablation using Ripple Mapping is one such method, and has recently been demonstrated to improve diagnostic accuracy of mapping and therefore improve acute procedural outcomes (termination of the tachycardia).

However, it is not known if improved acute procedural outcomes translate into long-term benefits for patients. At present, the recurrence rate following atrial tachycardia ablation is near 30%. We hypothesise that isthmus guided ablation using Ripple Mapping can reduce long-term recurrence following ablation as improved diagnostic accuracy of mapping can lead to more targeted, less extensive, ablation.

Patients referred for catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia will be randomised to undergo the procedure by isthmus targeted approach using Ripple Mapping or conventional approach using local activation time. Otherwise, the catheters used to perform the mapping and ablation will be the same in both groups. After the procedure, follow up will occur at 1 year with a further Holter Montior. Any arrhythmia recurrence will be documented and the two arms will be compared for acute success, 12 month success, ablation required and procedure time.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Tachycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Isthmus targeted approach using Ripple Mapping

Intervention: Isthmus targeted approach using Ripple Mapping catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia: Ripple Mapping guided.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ripple Mapping is used to map the atrial tachycardia mechanism. Using the scar thresholding technique the Ripple Map is interpreted and catheter ablation directed to the site of the heart identified as putative to the arrhythmia mechanism. All ablation lesions are confirmed to have conduction block across them using Ripple Mapping. This can include lesions created at previous ablation procedures.

Conventional Mapping

Intervention: conventional catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia: Conventional mapping guided.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional activation mapping is used to map the atrial tachycardia mechanism. The resultant (activation) map is interpreted and ablation directed to the site of the heart identified as putative to the arrhythmia mechanism. All ablation lesions are confirmed to have conduction block across them using conventional mapping. This can include lesions created at previous ablation procedures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia: Ripple Mapping guided.

Ripple Mapping is used to map the atrial tachycardia mechanism. Using the scar thresholding technique the Ripple Map is interpreted and catheter ablation directed to the site of the heart identified as putative to the arrhythmia mechanism. All ablation lesions are confirmed to have conduction block across them using Ripple Mapping. This can include lesions created at previous ablation procedures.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia: Conventional mapping guided.

Conventional activation mapping is used to map the atrial tachycardia mechanism. The resultant (activation) map is interpreted and ablation directed to the site of the heart identified as putative to the arrhythmia mechanism. All ablation lesions are confirmed to have conduction block across them using conventional mapping. This can include lesions created at previous ablation procedures.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Referred for catheter ablation of AT by the direct care team, based on clinical indication.
2. Male or female, aged \>18 years old.
3. Able to consent for recruitment to the trial and the catheter ablation procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindication to catheter ablation as deemed by the clinical team.
2. Typical atrial flutter or AF on ECG.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Trust

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cardiff & Vale UHB

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vishal Luther, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust

Newcastle, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kailey B, Kemp I, Taylor M, Crooks J, Katritsis G, Koa-Wing M, Jamil-Copley S, Linton N, Kanagaratnam P, Gupta D, Luther V. Ripple AT Plus - isthmus-guided vs conventional ablation in the treatment of scar-related atrial tachycardia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Oct;66(7):1533-1539. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01607-8. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37594646 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19SM5013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.