Risk-Based Screening for the Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation Trial

NCT ID: NCT03911986

Last Updated: 2024-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

755 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-21

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. To determine whether a risk-based screening programme for occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, involving extended cardiac monitoring in adults with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or greater, increases the detection of new atrial fibrillation/flutter.
2. To determine whether a risk-based screening programme for occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, involving extended cardiac monitoring in adults with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or greater, is cost-effective.
3. To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of self-monitoring of pulse in adults for detection of atrial fibrillation.
4. To determine the cost, cost effectiveness, and budget impact of a risk-based screening programme for occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, relative to a control of usual care in general practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. A first diagnosis of atrial fibrillation may occur at the time of stroke (e.g. about 45% of patients with acute stroke). Undiagnosed atrial fibrillation is therefore a major care-gap in stroke prevention.

Against this backdrop, oral anticoagulant therapy is extremely effective at reducing the risk of ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation, associated with a two-thirds risk reduction. Therefore, a major care gap in stroke prevention is the prevalence of undetected atrial fibrillation in the community. Traditional pulse screening in all patients \> 65 years detects new atrial fibrillation in about 1% of people.

The CHA2DS2-VASc score was developed and validated to risk-stratify patients with atrial fibrillation into low, intermediate and high risk of stroke. The Investigators believe that the CHA2DS2-VASc score represents an opportunity to identify patients at high risk of atrial fibrillation, but also identifies this at highest risk of stroke, and therefore those that will derive greatest benefit from anticoagulant therapy.

The advent of external-worn event loop recorders (ELRs) present a more convenient and efficient method of detecting atrial fibrillation. Loop recorders have an in-built diagnostic algorithm that identifies atrial fibrillation, and initiates recordings before and after the event-trigger. This rhythm strip is then examined and confirmed by the trial cardiac technician. The investigators will examine if using external loop recorders in patients identified as high risk will improve the detection rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

The study is a randomised controlled cross-over multi-centered clinical trial in General Practice. Ethical approval has been sought from the Galway University Hospitals research ethics committee. The investigators have also engaged with Clinical Research Patient and Public Involvement.

The investigators primary research question is whether extended cardiac rhythm monitoring (with ELR for 1 week), compared to standard care, in patients pre-identified to be at high-risk of atrial fibrillation (defined by CHA2DS2-VASc score \>2) increases the detection of new atrial fibrillation resulting in introduction of oral anticoagulant therapy, that is efficient, acceptable to patients and cost-effective.

All participating general practices will require the Socrates software package. The investigators will run analyses to identify patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc of 3 or greater. The investigators will exclude all patients with known atrial fibrillation, those in whom contraindications to oral anticoagulant therapy exist, and those who are deemed unsuitable for extended monitoring.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A randomized controlled cross-over multi-centered clinical trial in General Practice, comparing; a) opportunistic pulse screening + immediate ELR device (R-Test) for 1 week; or, b) opportunistic pulse screening + delayed ELR device (R-Test) for 1 week, in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or greater, and without a contraindication to oral anticoagulation.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

There is no masking.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate External Loop Recorder

Participants randomized to the Immediate External Loop Recorder group will be monitored for the duration of the first week of the study using the Novacor R-Test 4.

Group Type OTHER

R Test 4 External Loop Recorder

Intervention Type DEVICE

The R-Test 4 is an externally worn, re-usable, battery-powered, lightweight ECG monitor, which records events triggered by cardiac arrhythmias. It is worn for 7 days. Cardiac monitoring is triggered by tachycardia or detection of irregular pulses or patient may trigger recording, if the participant experience symptoms (e.g. palpitations). The patient wears 2 chest leads (on one, the R-Test device is attached, weight 42g). The R-Test 4 is CE marked, and uses an FDA-approved algorithm for automatic detection of atrial fibrillation, and permits 5 minutes of pre-event recording and 5 minutes of post-event recording.

Delayed External Loop Recorder

Participants randomized to the Delayed External Loop Recorder group will be monitored for the duration of the second week of the study using the Novacor R-Test 4.

Group Type OTHER

R Test 4 External Loop Recorder

Intervention Type DEVICE

The R-Test 4 is an externally worn, re-usable, battery-powered, lightweight ECG monitor, which records events triggered by cardiac arrhythmias. It is worn for 7 days. Cardiac monitoring is triggered by tachycardia or detection of irregular pulses or patient may trigger recording, if the participant experience symptoms (e.g. palpitations). The patient wears 2 chest leads (on one, the R-Test device is attached, weight 42g). The R-Test 4 is CE marked, and uses an FDA-approved algorithm for automatic detection of atrial fibrillation, and permits 5 minutes of pre-event recording and 5 minutes of post-event recording.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

R Test 4 External Loop Recorder

The R-Test 4 is an externally worn, re-usable, battery-powered, lightweight ECG monitor, which records events triggered by cardiac arrhythmias. It is worn for 7 days. Cardiac monitoring is triggered by tachycardia or detection of irregular pulses or patient may trigger recording, if the participant experience symptoms (e.g. palpitations). The patient wears 2 chest leads (on one, the R-Test device is attached, weight 42g). The R-Test 4 is CE marked, and uses an FDA-approved algorithm for automatic detection of atrial fibrillation, and permits 5 minutes of pre-event recording and 5 minutes of post-event recording.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Signed a study specific Informed Consent Form
2. 55 years of age or older
3. Attending one of the participating General Practices in the R-BEAT Trial
4. Attended at least one GP appointment within the past 12 months
5. CHA2DS2-VASc Score \>2

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindication to oral anticoagulant therapy

1. History of intracerebral haemorrhage
2. Prior intolerance or refusal of oral anticoagulant therapy

\*(If intolerant or refused warfarin, may be included if considered suitable for non vitamin-K oral anticoagulant, NOAC)
3. Gastrointestinal haemorrhage of unexplained or unmodifiable aetiology (i.e. risk of haemorrhage has not been reduced)
4. Other major bleed that would exclude oral anticoagulant therapy
2. Known Atrial fibrillation/flutter
3. Currently prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy
4. Unsuitable for anticoagulant therapy, in opinion of attending general practitioner
5. Unsuitable for cardiac monitoring, in opinion of attending general practitioner
6. Allergies to plasters or adhesives
7. Has had cardiac monitoring for \>48 hours within the last 12 months, has an implantable loop recorder, or scheduled to have cardiac monitoring/ILR.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Health Research Board, Ireland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ruairi Waters

Associate Specialist in Stroke Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Colin Hardy, BSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Project Officer and Site Management Coordinator

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HRB Clinical Research Facility Galway

Galway, County Galway, Ireland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Murphy R, Waters R, Murphy A, McDermott S, Reddin C, Hernon O, Davies N, Alvarez-Iglesias A, Twomey E, O'Shea E, Sloane P, Curran J, Kiely A, Waters C, Kilraine J, McDonagh S, Carney A, Devane D, O'Donnell M. Risk-based screening for the evaluation of atrial fibrillation in general practice (R-BEAT): a randomized cross-over trial. QJM. 2025 Mar 1;118(3):166-173. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaf001.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39786890 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-CRFG 17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The RIPPLE AT-PLUS Study
NCT03915691 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA