Care Pathway for Sub-acute Hip Rehabilitation

NCT ID: NCT03906864

Last Updated: 2019-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

162 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-09-08

Study Completion Date

2012-12-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The effectiveness of integrated care pathways for hip fractures in sub-acute rehabilitation settings is not known. The study objective was to assess if a hip fracture integrated care pathway at a sub-acute rehabilitation facility would result in better functional outcomes, shorter length of stay and fewer institutionalisations. A randomised controlled trial on an integrated care pathway was conducted for hip fracture patients in a sub-acute rehabilitation setting. The study supports the use of integrated care pathways in sub-acute rehabilitation settings to reduce length of stay whilst achieving the same functional gains.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients admitted to St Luke's Hospital, a 185-bed hospital in Singapore providing multidisciplinary stepdown care, from 8 September 2004 to 14 June 2006 for the purpose of rehabilitation after a new hip fracture were included. Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were present: (i) Pre-morbid non-ambulatory status, (ii) nursing home residents, (iii) palliative care patients, and (iv) patients previously enlisted for the trial. Administrative staff allocated patients to either ICP or usual care according to the last digit of their National Registration Identity Card (NRIC) numbers, odd numbers to the intervention group and even numbers to the control group. Patients were then admitted to 1 of 2 intervention wards or 1 of 3 control wards. Patients were enrolled by the principal investigators only after moving into their respective wards because of work flow limitations. Those who refused consent or were excluded remained in their assigned wards and received usual care. Both intervention and control groups were under the care of multidisciplinary teams but the intervention group had structured assessments and checklists in addition to usual care while the control group had usual care alone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Single Blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Usual care consisted of 2 half hourly therapy sessions per day from Monday to Friday and medical ward rounds 3 times a week. Multidisciplinary rounds were conducted every 2 weeks. Any specific goals or interventions were at the discretion of the managing team.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention group

Intervention group had structured assessments and checklists (as part of the integrated care pathway) in addition to usual care.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Care Pathway

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention group had the following as part of the integrated care pathway:

1. Medical assessment on admission for risk factors for falls.
2. A weekly assessment of complications including pain, deep venous thrombosis, anaemia, wounds and pressure ulcers, etc. The Confusion Assessment Method and the Geriatric Depression Scale were utilized.
3. Physiotherapy and occupational therapy guidelines with recommended milestones (set for the full, partial and non-weight bearing groups)
4. Physiotherapy Clinical Outcome Variables Scale (PTCOVS)16 was used by the physiotherapists in the intervention group to assess the baseline mobility, to define outcome goals and to direct treatment plans.
5. A postoperative hip precaution handout (containing information on avoiding hip prosthesis dislocation in patients with total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty) was given to patients and their caregivers.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Care Pathway

The intervention group had the following as part of the integrated care pathway:

1. Medical assessment on admission for risk factors for falls.
2. A weekly assessment of complications including pain, deep venous thrombosis, anaemia, wounds and pressure ulcers, etc. The Confusion Assessment Method and the Geriatric Depression Scale were utilized.
3. Physiotherapy and occupational therapy guidelines with recommended milestones (set for the full, partial and non-weight bearing groups)
4. Physiotherapy Clinical Outcome Variables Scale (PTCOVS)16 was used by the physiotherapists in the intervention group to assess the baseline mobility, to define outcome goals and to direct treatment plans.
5. A postoperative hip precaution handout (containing information on avoiding hip prosthesis dislocation in patients with total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty) was given to patients and their caregivers.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients admitted to St Luke's Hospital for the purpose of rehabilitation after a new hip fracture.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria were present: (i) Pre-morbid non-ambulatory status, (ii) nursing home residents, (iii) palliative care patients, and (iv) patients previously enlisted for the trial.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National University of Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St Luke's Hospital, Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Boon Yeow, Tan

Chief Executive Officer, Medical Director, Medical Division

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tze Pin Ng, FAMS, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

National University of Singapore

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Luke's Hospital, Singapore

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Handoll HH, Cameron ID, Mak JC, Panagoda CE, Finnegan TP. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):CD007125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007125.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34766330 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

65 68953250

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

slhdoc01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spitex-SpiTal-Autonomie-Reha-Kraft
NCT03154684 TERMINATED NA