Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
304 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-04
2022-09-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
16-week Efficacy and 3-year Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients
NCT02008916
Effect of Secukinumab on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis as Compared to GP2017 (Adalimumab Biosimilar)
NCT03259074
Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of an Intravenous Regimen of Secukinumab Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Active axSpA
NCT04156620
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
NCT02896127
Study Estimating the Clinical Difference Between 300 mg and 150 mg of Secukinumab Following Dose Escalation to 300 mg in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
NCT03350815
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were evaluated every 12 weeks from Baseline through to Week 36. Safety evaluations were included in the regular visits; in addition, a safety follow-up visit was performed 20 weeks after the last study visit (i.e. Week 36) and took place at Week 56 for patients completing the study according to the protocol.
Patients assigned to the SOC treatment group received SOC treatment at the discretion of the investigator in accordance with current clinical practice.
Patients assigned to the T2T treatment group received first line biological treatment with secukinumab 150 mg. Responders were defined as those patients with an ASDAS clinically important improvement of ≥ 1.1.
At week 12 responders continued secukinumab 150 mg, whereas treatment was escalated to 300 mg for non-responders.
At week 24, disease activity was assessed again. Patients who qualify as responders continued the treatment they received prior (either secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg), patients who were non-responders at week 24 were escalated in treatment: patients who received secukinumab 300 mg before were switched to Adalimumab, and patients who received secukinumab 150mg before were escalated to secukinumab 300mg.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TREAT-TO-TARGET (T2T)
Patients received secukinumab 150 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) weekly until Week 4 (Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4)) and then at Week 8. At Week 12, if ASDAS clinically important improvement was achieved and maintained, patients received treatment up to Week 32 if they maintained the response. If ASDAS clinically important improvement was not achieved, patients received an escalated dose of secukinumab 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks until Week 20.
At Week 24, patients who were receiving secukinumab 300 mg, and achieved ASDAS clinically important improvement, continued treatment up to Week 32. If patients did not achieve ASDAS clinically important improvement, they were switched to adalimumab biosimilar (Hyrimoz®) 40 mg s.c. every 2 weeks until Week 34.
Each patient was treated for a maximum of 36 weeks (last dose of secukinumab at Week 32, last dose of adalimumab biosimilar (Hyrimoz®) at Week 34).
Secukinumab/Adalimumab-Biosimilar
Secukinumab 150 mg, s.c. Secukinumab 300 mg, s.c. Adalimumab biosimilar 40 mg, s.c.
Standard-of-care (SOC)
Patients received SOC treatment according to local practice standards by their treating rheumatologist following latest treatment recommendations with NSAIDs as the first-choice drug treatment and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for patients with active disease despite the use (or intolerance/contraindication) of NSAIDs.
Standard-of-care
Treatment according to local practice standards by the rheumatologist following latest treatment recommendations with NSAIDs as the first-choice drug treatment and DMARDs for patients with active disease despite the use (or intolerance/contraindication) of NSAIDs.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Secukinumab/Adalimumab-Biosimilar
Secukinumab 150 mg, s.c. Secukinumab 300 mg, s.c. Adalimumab biosimilar 40 mg, s.c.
Standard-of-care
Treatment according to local practice standards by the rheumatologist following latest treatment recommendations with NSAIDs as the first-choice drug treatment and DMARDs for patients with active disease despite the use (or intolerance/contraindication) of NSAIDs.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Active disease as defined by having an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score ≥ 2.1 at Screening and Baseline despite concurrent Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) therapy, or intolerance/contraindication to NSAIDs.
* Objective signs of inflammation at Screening as defined by: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints performed up to 3 months prior to screening showing acute inflammatory lesion(s), OR elevated quick C-reactive Protein (CRP) (\> 5 mg/L), OR MRI showing acute inflammatory lesion(s) in the sacroiliac joints and spine performed during screening period.
* Inadequate response to NSAIDs
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have previously been treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha inhibitors (investigational or approved).
* Patients treated with any cell-depleting therapies.
* Active ongoing inflammatory diseases or underlying metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal conditions, which in the opinion of the investigator immunosuppressed the patient and/or places the patient at unacceptable risk for participation in an immunomodulatory therapy.
* History of clinically significant liver disease or liver injury
* History of renal trauma, glomerulonephritis, or patients with one kidney only, or a serum creatinine level exceeding 1.8 mg/dL (159.12 μmol/L).
* Active systemic infections during the last 2 weeks (exception: common cold) prior to randomization.
* History of ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease or evidence of tuberculosis (TB) infection
* Patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or hepatitis C
* Life vaccinations within 6 weeks prior to Baseline or planned vaccination during study participation until 12 weeks after last study treatment administration.
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, Cedex1, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Limoges, Haute Vienne, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Caluire-et-Cuire, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Chambray-lès-Tours, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Grenoble, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Mans, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Orléans, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Doberan, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Pyrmont, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Chemnitz, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cottbus, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ehringshausen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Freiberg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Gera, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Gommern, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Herne, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hildesheim, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
München, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
München, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Potsdam, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ratingen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Rendsburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Trier, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Poddubnyy D, Hammel L, Heyne M, Veit J, Jentzsch C, Baraliakos X. Treat-to-target strategy with secukinumab as a first-line biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug compared to standard-of-care treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: protocol for a randomised open-label phase III study, AScalate. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 30;10(9):e039059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039059.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on www.novctrd.com
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-003882-32
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CAIN457HDE01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.