16 Week Efficacy and 2 Year Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
NCT ID: NCT01358175
Last Updated: 2017-03-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
371 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
16 Week Efficacy and 5 Year Long Term Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Secukinumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
NCT01649375
16-week Efficacy and 3-year Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients
NCT02008916
16-week Efficacy and 2-year Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Participants With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
NCT02159053
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Patients With Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
NCT02696031
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
NCT02896127
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Secukinumab 10 mg/kg i.v. / 75 mg s.c.
Three i.v. infusions: at Baseline and weeks 2 and 4, followed by one s.c. injection every four weeks until the end of the study.
Secukinumab (75 mg)
Secukinumab (75 mg)
Secukinumab 10 mg/kg i.v. / 150 mg s.c.
Three i.v. infusions: at Baseline and weeks 2 and 4, followed by one s.c. injection every four weeks until the end of the study.
Secukinumab (150 mg)
Secukinumab (150 mg)
Placebo
Three i.v. infusions: at Baseline and weeks 2 and 4, followed by one s.c. injection every four weeks until the end of the study.
Placebo
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Secukinumab (75 mg)
Secukinumab (75 mg)
Secukinumab (150 mg)
Secukinumab (150 mg)
Placebo
Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of moderate to severe AS with prior documented radiologic evidence (X-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS (1984)
* Patients should have been on NSAIDs with an inadequate response
* Patients who are regularly taking NSAIDs as part of their AS therapy are required to be on a stable dose
* Patients who have been on an anti-TNFα agent (not more than one) must have experienced an inadequate response
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with total ankylosis of the spine
* Patients previously treated with any biological immunomodulating agents except for those targeting TNFα
* Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Boise, Idaho, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Jackson, Tennessee, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Austin, Texas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Benbrook, Texas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Spokane, Washington, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Genk, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Burgas, Bulgaria, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, Bulgaria, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, Bulgaria, Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Limoges, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, Germany, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Herne, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Jena, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Nuremberg, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Ratingen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Valeggio sul Mincio, (vr), Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Brescia, BS, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Catania, CT, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Palermo, PA, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Siena, SI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Mexicali, Estado de Baja California, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Jesus Maria, Lima region, Peru
Novartis Investigative Site
La Victoria, Lima region, Peru
Novartis Investigative Site
Pueblo Libre, Lima region, Peru
Novartis Investigative Site
San Isidro, Lima region, Peru
Novartis Investigative Site
Surquillo, Lima region, Peru
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Tula, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Yaroslavl, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Yekaterinburg, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Yekaterinburg, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, Taiwan ROC, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Balcova / Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Novartis Investigative Site
Fatih / Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Novartis Investigative Site
Gaziantep, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Novartis Investigative Site
London, England, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jamaludin A, Windsor R, Ather S, Kadir T, Zisserman A, Braun J, Gensler LS, Ostergaard M, Poddubnyy D, Coroller T, Porter B, Ligozio G, Readie A, Machado PM. Automated detection of spinal bone marrow oedema in axial spondyloarthritis: training and validation using two large phase 3 trial datasets. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jun 9:keaf323. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf323. Online ahead of print.
Braun J, Buehring B, Baraliakos X, Gensler LS, Porter B, Quebe-Fehling E, Haemmerle S. Effects of secukinumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover biomarkers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year data from a phase 3 study, MEASURE 1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 13;22(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04930-1.
van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Miceli-Richard C, Braun J, Marzo-Ortega H, Pavelka K, Kivitz AJ, Deodhar A, Bao W, Porter B, Pournara E. A Pooled Analysis Reporting the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Male and Female Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1775-1787. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00380-2. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
Schett G, Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Deodhar A, Ostergaard M, Gupta AD, Mpofu S, Fox T, Winseck A, Porter B, Shete A, Gensler LS. Secukinumab Efficacy on Enthesitis in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Four Pivotal Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;48(8):1251-1258. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.201111. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Machado PM, Gensler LS, Marzo-Ortega H, Sherif B, Quebe-Fehling E, Porter B, Gaillez C, Deodhar A. Achievement of Remission Endpoints with Secukinumab Over 3 Years in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):273-288. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00269-6. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
Himmler S, Branner JC, Ostwald DA. The societal impact of a biologic treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a case study based on secukinumab. J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):143-155. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0077. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Kvien TK, Conaghan PG, Gossec L, Strand V, Ostergaard M, Poddubnyy D, Williams N, Porter B, Shete A, Gilloteau I, Deodhar A. Secukinumab and Sustained Reduction in Fatigue in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Long-Term Results of Two Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 May;74(5):759-767. doi: 10.1002/acr.24517. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Deodhar AA, Miceli-Richard C, Baraliakos X, Marzo-Ortega H, Gladman DD, Blanco R, Das Gupta A, Martin R, Safi J Jr, Porter B, Shete A, Rosenbaum JT. Incidence of Uveitis in Secukinumab-treated Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Data Analysis From Three Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 May;2(5):294-299. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11139. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
Deodhar A, Gladman DD, McInnes IB, Spindeldreher S, Martin R, Pricop L, Porter B, Safi J Jr, Shete A, Bruin G. Secukinumab Immunogenicity over 52 Weeks in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;47(4):539-547. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190116. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
Braun J, Deodhar A, Landewe R, Baraliakos X, Miceli-Richard C, Sieper J, Quebe-Fehling E, Martin R, Porter B, Gandhi KK, van der Heijde D; MEASURE 1 and MEASURE 2 study groups. Impact of baseline C-reactive protein levels on the response to secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis: 3-year pooled data from two phase III studies. RMD Open. 2018 Nov 21;4(2):e000749. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000749. eCollection 2018.
Wei JC, Baeten D, Sieper J, Deodhar A, Bhosekar V, Martin R, Porter B. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Asian patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: 52-week pooled results from two phase 3 studies. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 May;20(5):589-596. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13094. Epub 2017 May 25.
Braun J, Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, Baeten D, Sieper J, Emery P, Readie A, Martin R, Mpofu S, Richards HB; MEASURE 1 study group. Effect of secukinumab on clinical and radiographic outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year results from the randomised phase III MEASURE 1 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1070-1077. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209730. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
Deodhar AA, Dougados M, Baeten DL, Cheng-Chung Wei J, Geusens P, Readie A, Richards HB, Martin R, Porter B. Effect of Secukinumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Phase III Randomized Trial (MEASURE 1). Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;68(12):2901-2910. doi: 10.1002/art.39805.
Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, Baraliakos X, Dougados M, Emery P, Deodhar A, Porter B, Martin R, Andersson M, Mpofu S, Richards HB; MEASURE 1 Study Group; MEASURE 2 Study Group. Secukinumab, an Interleukin-17A Inhibitor, in Ankylosing Spondylitis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2534-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505066.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-024529-18
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CAIN457F2305
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.