Volume Support/Assist Control Mode Ventilation and Diaphragmatic Atrophy

NCT ID: NCT03901924

Last Updated: 2025-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

468 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-04

Study Completion Date

2027-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the study is to determine how controlled mode ventilation and support mode ventilation impact ventilator-free days and diaphragmatic atrophy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD) is characterized by diaphragmatic atrophy and weakness leading to an inability to liberate from the ventilator. Patients with VIDD have increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, higher reintubation rates, and need for tracheostomy. There are two commonly used modes of ventilation in the ICU - controlled and support mode ventilation. Conventional practice is to initiate mechanical ventilation with controlled mode followed by a support mode to facilitate weaning and eventual extubation. However, this approach may induce irreversible diaphragmatic atrophy. Observational studies suggest that controlled ventilation is associated with higher rates of diaphragmatic atrophy than support modes of ventilation. Diaphragmatic atrophy occurs within the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. To date, it remains unknown whether early initiation of support mode ventilation prevents VIDD and its associated complications in comparison to controlled mode ventilation.

The investigators hypothesize that by initiating subjects on support mode ventilation, an associated increase in ventilator-free days will be seen in comparison to subjects on controlled mode ventilation. Subjects on support mode ventilation will have less diaphragmatic atrophy and weakness than subjects on controlled mode ventilation. To investigate this hypothesis,investigators are conducting a phase III randomized trial examining the effects of volume support mode versus assist control mode ventilation on ventilator-free days and rate of diaphragm atrophy.

enrolled subjects requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized to either volume support mode or assist control mode within 24 hours of mechanical ventilation initiation. Diaphragm thickness will be measured by ultrasound daily and subsequently diaphragm atrophy rate will be calculated in each arm. The operator acquiring ultrasound images will be blinded to the ventilator mode that the subject was randomized to. Subjects in the study will follow standard ICU sedation awakening trials and spontaneous breathing trials. The medical team in charge of the subject will determine when the subject will be liberated from the ventilator.

There will be up to a 24 hour period from initiation of standard, non-study mechanical ventilation during which the subject can be consented and enrolled. This will allow the research team time to contact the subject and/or family in order to obtain informed consent. Once randomized, all subjects will be initiated on study mode of ventilation. The medical team will direct other aspects of care.

The phase III trial will be powered to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in rate of diaphragm atrophy and ventilator-free days between volume support mode and assist control mode.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Investigator and outcomes assessor will be masked to randomization and ventilator settings

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Volume Support Mode Mechanical Ventilation

Volume support mode ventilation is a spontaneous mode where a target goal volume is set on the ventilator. This ventilatory strategy is dependent on patients spontaneously breathing and triggering (or activating) the ventilator to support the breath. The ventilator adjusts the amount of pressure support to deliver with each breath (i.e. if the patient's tidal volume is greater than the set target volume, then the ventilator will decrease the amount of pressure support in the subsequent breath to try to achieve the goal volume and vice versa). The respiratory rate is not set in this mode of ventilation and is dependent on the patient. For patients randomized to this mode, the goal tidal volume will be set at 6 cc/kg of ideal body weight (IBW).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Volume Support Mode Mechanical Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

This is a spontaneous mode of mechanical ventilation that depends on the patient's efforts. A target volume (6 cc/kg of IBW), PEEP and FiO2 are set by the medical team, and the ventilator varies the inspiratory pressure support with each breath to achieve the target volume. The respiratory rate is fully dependent on the patient. Sedation while on mechanical ventilation will be set at a goal RASS of 0 to -2.

Assist Control Mode Mechanical Ventilation

In assist control mode ventilation, the machine is programmed to deliver a set tidal volume and set respiratory rate. Patients can breathe over the set respiratory rate, but the volume of breath that they receive is fixed and delivered by the ventilator. For patients randomized to this mode, the tidal volume will be set at 6 cc/kg of ideal body weight (IBW).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Assist Control Mode Mechanical Ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

This is a controlled mode of mechanical ventilation that is independent of patient's efforts. A tidal volume (6 cc/kg of IBW), respiratory rate, PEEP and FiO2 are set by the medical team. Sedation while on mechanical ventilation will be set at a goal RASS of 0 to -2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Volume Support Mode Mechanical Ventilation

This is a spontaneous mode of mechanical ventilation that depends on the patient's efforts. A target volume (6 cc/kg of IBW), PEEP and FiO2 are set by the medical team, and the ventilator varies the inspiratory pressure support with each breath to achieve the target volume. The respiratory rate is fully dependent on the patient. Sedation while on mechanical ventilation will be set at a goal RASS of 0 to -2.

Intervention Type OTHER

Assist Control Mode Mechanical Ventilation

This is a controlled mode of mechanical ventilation that is independent of patient's efforts. A tidal volume (6 cc/kg of IBW), respiratory rate, PEEP and FiO2 are set by the medical team. Sedation while on mechanical ventilation will be set at a goal RASS of 0 to -2.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

subjects \> 18 years of age that have been intubated and mechanically ventilated for \< 36 hours at the time of screening will be eligible for enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

1. pregnancy
2. cardiopulmonary arrest
3. history of diaphragmatic paralysis or neuromuscular disease
4. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma exacerbation with evidence of auto-PEEPing requiring intubation
5. neuromuscular blockade
6. expectation to be liberated from ventilator in \< 24 hours
7. history of mechanical ventilation in the last 6 months
8. presence of tracheostomy
9. high cervical spine injury
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John P Kress, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Chicago

Bhakti Patel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Roger Struble, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Chicago Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bhakti Patel, MD

Role: CONTACT

773-702-0902

Anne S Pohlman, MSN

Role: CONTACT

773-702-3804

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bhakti Patel, MD

Role: primary

773-702-0902

Anne S Pohlman, MSN

Role: backup

773-702-3804

Roger Struble, MD

Role: primary

785-342-6930

Boulos Nasser, MD

Role: backup

3193546563

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-1482

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.