Implementation Program to Improve CHG Bathing Compliance
NCT ID: NCT03898115
Last Updated: 2022-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-01
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Units eligible for the study will have patients that are critically ill admitted and have had at least 1 CLABSI events over the past 12 months (fiscal year). Given the pragmatic nature of the study design, there will be limited additional inclusion and exclusion criteria. Prior to the beginning the study, all nursing staff (RNs and nursing assistants \[NAs\]) will receive a survey link (RedCAP) to understand their perceptions of CHG bathing. After all units have been enrolled (approximately 4 months), nursing staff will be sent a post-survey to see if their perceptions have improved after the program. Further, the Context Assessment Index (used with permission; via RedCAP) will also be used to assess the context (i.e., culture) in which clinicians works and the effect this has on using evidence in practice. This will be provided to infection prevention champions on each unit one time, at the beginning of enrollment.
All hospitals in the trial will receive access to site-level quality reports on CLABSI data. The interventions will include a "direct engagement" at the site level; this strategy will build upon current quality improvement interventions developed from the Agency for Healthcare Research \& Quality for optimization of care for critically ill patients at risk for CLABSIs. The multidisciplinary teams will include national key opinion leaders in quality improvement working with local infection prevention specialists and support staff to help healthcare systems and hospitals design or revise quality improvement plans. Units will receive feedback on quality improvement efforts, including audit and feedback reviewing their CHG bathing compliance and CLABSI rates. Duke will serve as the primary statistical center and analysis will be generated by Duke. The only risk in this study is the possibility of breach of confidentiality.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of a customized, multifaceted quality improvement \[QI\] program on compliance with daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing per the AHRQ protocol in inpatient units that admit critically ill patients. Further, we will assess the effect of this program on nursing staffs' perception of the importance of CHG bathing. The Context Assessment Index (used with permission) will also be used to assess the context (i.e., culture) in which clinicians works and the effect this has on using evidence in practice. The secondary objective of this study is to examine the effect of the QI program on central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. Primary outcomes and CLABSI rates will be measured at 12 months to assess sustainability.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Daily Chlorexidine Bath for Health Care Associated Infection Prevention
NCT05485051
Daily Chlorhexidine Bathing and Infection Rates in Critically-ill Patients
NCT02033187
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Education Video Among Hospitalized Patients
NCT06112626
Impact of Daily Bathing With Chlorhexidine in the Critical Patient
NCT02870062
The Association Between Chlorhexidine Bathing and Central Line-Associated Infections in Medical Intensive Care Units
NCT05919966
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CHG Bathing Implementation
In a step-wedged design, ICUs and BMT units will be enrolled into a educational program to improve knowledge/compliance with daily CHG bathing
CHG Education
The CHG educational intervention will include "educational outreach" and "audit and feedback" implementation strategies
Control
In a step-wedged design, ICUs and BMT units will be enrolled over a rolling 4 month time frame; when not enrolled, this data will serve as control data
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CHG Education
The CHG educational intervention will include "educational outreach" and "audit and feedback" implementation strategies
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Staci Reynolds, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Wake Med
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Reynolds SS, Granger BB, Hatch D. Self-Reported versus observed audit: Measuring CHG bathing compliance. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Dec;49(12):1575-1577. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
Woltz PC, Granger BB, Reynolds SS. Measuring and Evaluating Clinical Context in Implementation Science Research. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2022 Mar 15;33(1):103-110. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2022664. No abstract available.
Reynolds SS, Woltz P, Neff J, Elliott J, Granger BB. Impact of an Implementation Science Study on Nursing Leader Competencies: A Qualitative Study. Nurse Leader. 2022; 20(1): 70-74.
Reynolds SS, Woltz P, Keating E, Neff J, Elliott J, Hatch D, Yang Q, Granger BB. Results of the CHlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing implementation intervention to improve evidence-based nursing practices for prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections Study (CHanGing BathS): a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 26;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01112-4.
Reynolds SS, Woltz P, Keating E, Neff J, Elliott J, Granger BB. Program Evaluation of Implementation Science Outcomes From an Intervention to Improve Compliance With Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing: A Qualitative Study. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;41(4):200-208. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000530.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00101819
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.