Predictive A1c Based on CGM Data Using CGM Data

NCT ID: NCT03898076

Last Updated: 2021-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction. The hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) reflects the average blood glucose level for last two to three months. Recent advancements in the sensor technology facilitate the daily monitoring of the blood glucose using CGM devices. The future prediction of the HbA1C based on the CGM data holds a critical significance in maintaining long term health of diabetes patients. A higher than normal value of the HbA1c greatly increases the likelihood of diabetes related cardiovascular disease.

Goal. The aim this study is to predict the HbA1c in advance by utilizing the CGM data through applying machine learning techniques. The outcomes of this research will assist in improving the health of diabetic patients.

Methods. This is a retrospective analysis. The investigators will de-identify and analyze 120 patients with T1D who using CGM sensor for last three months. Past 15 days of CGM data will be analyzed and different glucose variability features such as time in range (TIR), coefficient of variation (CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), mean of daily differences (MODD), continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA) will be extracted. A machine learning model will calculate (predict) HbA1c in 2-3 months advance based on these 15 days of CGM data. To evaluate the performance of the proposed prediction model, predicted HbA1c will be compared with the real HbA1c.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a retrospective analysis. The investigators will de-identify and analyze 120 patients with T1D using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) system for last three months. Past 15 days of CGM data will be analyzed and different glucose variability features such as time in range (TIR), coefficient of variation (CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), mean of daily differences (MODD), continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA) will be extracted. A machine learning model will be developed to predict HbA1c in 2-3 months advance based on these 15 days of CGM data. The model is using linear regression, penalized regression (Ridge regression, Lasso regression and Elastic net regression) in combination gradient boosting to calculate predictive A1c

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flash Glucose Monitoring

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) values will be downloaded from CGM device for a period of 90 days.

Intervention Type DEVICE

A1c

A1c levels will be collected from Hospital EMR prior to CGM data downoad

Intervention Type OTHER

Predictive A1c

Predictive A1c will be calculated based on the first 15 days of CGM data using time in range (TIR), coefficient of variation (CV), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), mean of daily differences (MODD), continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA). Predictive A1c will be correlated with actual A1c.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 1 Diabetes
* Flash glucose Monitoring system

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 70% od CGM data in the last 90 days.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sidra Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Goran Petrovski

Goran Petrovski Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marwa Qaraqe, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha

Hasan Abbas, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

TAMUQ, Doha

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sidra Medicine

Doha, Qa, Qatar

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Qatar

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ball MJ, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inform. 2001 Apr;61(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00130-1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11248599 (View on PubMed)

Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998 Jul;15(7):539-53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:73.0.CO;2-S.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9686693 (View on PubMed)

Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, Cavan D, Shaw JE, Makaroff LE. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28437734 (View on PubMed)

Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer HM, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, Goldstein DE. Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA(1c): analysis of glucose profiles and HbA(1c) in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 2002 Feb;25(2):275-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.2.275.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11815495 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019003271

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BGM and HbA1c POC Device Evaluation
NCT06170515 RECRUITING NA