Women's Health Behaviors Stages of Change (Transtheoretical Model) in Preconception Period

NCT ID: NCT03893084

Last Updated: 2024-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

H0: Preconceptional preparatory training period between pregnancies with and without women is no difference in terms of changes in health behavior.

H1: Preconceptional preparatory training period between pregnancies with and without women there is a difference in terms of changes in health behavior.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In order to reach for the second follow-up of women both her and her partner/mother phone number were registered.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Women Education

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The women who came to the institution were evaluated in terms of sample criteria and randomized sampling was divided into two groups. In order to be able to perform randomized sampling, random number table was obtained automatically by means of programs on internet sites by specifying the number of samples. The selection of the groups to the intervention and control group was determined by throwing a coin.

In the data collection phase of the study, 218 women were evaluated in terms of sampling criteria. 10 women (who did not meet the criteria or refused to participate) were excluded from the study. 208 randomized women were divided into two groups as intervention and control group. During the follow-up, 15 women in the intervention group and 13 women in the control group were excluded from the study or were excluded because of pregnancy.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Preconception guidance prepared by reference to the guidelines published in the literature, women were given pre-pregnancy training.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pregnancy preparation training

Intervention Type OTHER

Pregnancy preparation education; folic acid use, physical activity, nutrition, addictions counseling issues are included.

Control

The women in the control group were not given training, and routine practice was performed.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pregnancy preparation training

Pregnancy preparation education; folic acid use, physical activity, nutrition, addictions counseling issues are included.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Accept to participate in the research and have signed the informed consent form,
* Being over 18 years old,
* To be literate,
* Lack of a psychological diagnosis,
* To be married,
* Having no pregnancy,
* Pregnancy is thought.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ege University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yasemin ERKAL AKSOY

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

17 Number Family Health Center

Konya, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442: Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;114(4):950. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bd12f4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19888064 (View on PubMed)

Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 521: Update on immunization and pregnancy: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;119(3):690-1. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824e1327.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22353979 (View on PubMed)

Atrash HK, Johnson K, Adams M, Cordero JF, Howse J. Preconception care for improving perinatal outcomes: the time to act. Matern Child Health J. 2006 Sep;10(5 Suppl):S3-11. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0100-4. Epub 2006 Jun 14. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16773452 (View on PubMed)

Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, Sankar MJ, Blencowe H, Rizvi A, Chou VB, Walker N; Lancet Newborn Interventions Review Group; Lancet Every Newborn Study Group. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3. Epub 2014 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24853604 (View on PubMed)

de Weerd S, Steegers EA. The past and present practices and continuing controversies of preconception care. Community Genet. 2002;5(1):50-60. doi: 10.1159/000064631.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14960900 (View on PubMed)

Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987 Mar-Apr;36(2):76-81.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3644262 (View on PubMed)

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37.).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0000-0002-7453-1205

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.