Sub-type Specific Genomic Mutations in sBOTs

NCT ID: NCT03883542

Last Updated: 2023-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-31

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern.

The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOTs) behave indolently in the vast majority of cases and the prognosis is usually favorable. There is more evidence that two subtypes of BOTs represent a higher risk of recurrence or even progression to an invasive ovarian cancer. In case of a presentation with a micro-papillary grow pattern or when invasive implants are diagnosed the prognosis tend to be less favorable.

Genome sequencing in ovarian cancer helped to differentiate two different pathways in the carcinogenesis.

Low grade serous carcinomas evolving from adenofibromas or borderline tumors over non-invasive micropapillary serous borderline tumors to invasive micropapillary serous carcinoma, show frequent mutations in the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma gene (KRAS), B-Raf Kinase gene(BRAF), Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 gene (ERBB2), Phosphatase and Tensin homolog gene (PTEN), Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA) and Catenin Beta 1 gene (CTNNB1). This pathway is called Type I and is characterized by a slow step-wise process. These low-grade invasive tumors are indolent and are known with a better outcome than high-grade invasive tumors.

In contrast the Type II pathway development of invasive tumors is rapid and vast majority of tumors show a Tumor Protein p53 (TP53) mutation and loss of Breast Cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1).

The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern.

The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Neoplasm Epithelial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

serous BOT

simple serous BOT ovarian tissue

genomic mutations study

Intervention Type GENETIC

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

1. serous BOT tissue,
2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

serous BOT with non-invasive implants

BOT ovarian tissue presenting with non-invasive implants

genomic mutations study

Intervention Type GENETIC

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

1. serous BOT tissue,
2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

sBOT with micropapillary grow pattern

BOT ovarian tissue presenting with micropapillary grow pattern

genomic mutations study

Intervention Type GENETIC

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

1. serous BOT tissue,
2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

serous BOT with invasive implants

sBOT ovarian tissue presenting with invasive implants at the time of diagnosis

genomic mutations study

Intervention Type GENETIC

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

1. serous BOT tissue,
2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

genomic mutations study

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

1. serous BOT tissue,
2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

Intervention Type GENETIC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Paraffin embedded material from the original borderline ovarian tumor must be present and of good quality for DNA extraction.
* Original slides are available for central pathological review.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of invasive ovarian carcinoma.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefan Cosyns

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

stef cosyns, dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UZBrussel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitair Ziekenhuis UZBrussel

Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Stefan Cosyns, Dr

Role: CONTACT

24776020 ext. +32

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Stefan Cosyns, Md

Role: primary

24776020 ext. 0032

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Morice P, Uzan C, Fauvet R, Gouy S, Duvillard P, Darai E. Borderline ovarian tumour: pathological diagnostic dilemma and risk factors for invasive or lethal recurrence. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):e103-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70288-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22381933 (View on PubMed)

Vang R, Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009 Sep;16(5):267-82. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181b4fffa.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19700937 (View on PubMed)

Despierre E, Lambrechts D, Neven P, Amant F, Lambrechts S, Vergote I. The molecular genetic basis of ovarian cancer and its roadmap towards a better treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 May;117(2):358-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20207398 (View on PubMed)

Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):433-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cf3d79.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20154587 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

sBOT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.