Efficacy of Non-instrumental Pleural Chest Physiotherapy

NCT ID: NCT03861897

Last Updated: 2024-12-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-06

Study Completion Date

2024-12-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main purpose of this study is to assess efficacy of non instrumental pleural chest physiotherapy on the recovery of respiratory function, at hospital discharge or 15 days after beginning the pleural chest physiotherapy, compared to physiotherapy with standard mobilization, in patients with infectious pleural effusion, who have received usual medical treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pleural effusions are defined by an abnormal amount of fluid in the pleural space. Those complicating a pneumonia are commonly encountered in pneumology departments, and their number are increasing. If not quickly treated, complications often occur: pleural adhesions, pleural thickening which can lead to a restrictive lung disease, or even to surgery. The average length of stay in hospital of this patients is 15 days. The management of infectious pleural effusion consists of removing the fluid from the pleural space (pleural puncturing or drainage), with or without fibrinolytics, antibiotics, and chest physiotherapy. Chest physiotherapy is often prescribed, but its benefits are largely based on empirical evidence. In the absence of recommendations, chest physiotherapy is done in heterogeneous ways, in France and abroad.

Pleural chest physiotherapy combines postural respiratory exercises, increased ventilation with dynamics expirations, and early inspiratory exercises, resulting in mobilization of pleura and pleural fluid. The hypothesis is that pleural chest physiotherapy thus makes it possible to fight against pleural effusion stagnation, to help resorption of pleural fluid, to limit formation of pleural adhesions and fixed restrictive lung disease. This should improve the recovery of respiratory function, and allow a shorter hospital stay, an improvement of the quality of life, earlier resumption of activities, and a reduction in the risk of complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infectious Pleural Effusion

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Non instrumental physiotherapy Physiotherapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention KRP-NI + KM

Realization of Non instrumental pleural chest physiotherapy and Mobilization physiotherapy sessions (KRP-NI)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

KRP-NI + KM

Intervention Type OTHER

Non instrumental pleural chest physiotherapy (KRP-NI), 2 sessions a day on weekdays and 1 session a day on weekends and mobilization physiotherapy (KM), 1 session per day except weekend during the hospitalization. The combination of the two physiotherapy is KRP-NI + KM. Afterward, 3 sessions per week, renewable until M3 of non instrumental pleural respiratory physiotherapy. If necessary the doctor can prescribe sessions of mobilization physiotherapy

Control KM

Realization of mobilization physiotherapy sessions (KM)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

KM

Intervention Type OTHER

Mobilization physiotherapy (1 session per day except weekend) during the hospitalization. Afterward, if necessary the doctor can prescribe sessions of mobilization physiotherapy(KM).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

KRP-NI + KM

Non instrumental pleural chest physiotherapy (KRP-NI), 2 sessions a day on weekdays and 1 session a day on weekends and mobilization physiotherapy (KM), 1 session per day except weekend during the hospitalization. The combination of the two physiotherapy is KRP-NI + KM. Afterward, 3 sessions per week, renewable until M3 of non instrumental pleural respiratory physiotherapy. If necessary the doctor can prescribe sessions of mobilization physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

KM

Mobilization physiotherapy (1 session per day except weekend) during the hospitalization. Afterward, if necessary the doctor can prescribe sessions of mobilization physiotherapy(KM).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ eighteen years old
* to be hospitalized for an infectious pleural outpouring
* to have a liquid pleural outpouring diagnosed by echography or to scan thoracic
* presence of a Exudate according to the criteria of Light, to have at least criteria:

* The ratio of pleural fluid protein to serum protein is greater than 0.5
* The ratio of pleural fluid Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and serum LDH is greater than 0.6
* The rate of pleural fluid LDH is \> 2/3 upper limit of normal serum LDH of the laboratory concerned
* presence of at least two of the following criteria:

* fever higher or equal 38°C (100.4°F)
* thoracic pain
* purulent sputum
* purulent pleural effusion at the time of the exploring pleural puncture
* hearth of crackling to the sounding
* Inflammatory syndrome (CRP\>15 mg/l and/or White blood cell \>10 000 /mm3)
* no known radiological hearth before
* Having undergone an evacuation gesture going back to less forty-eight hours: evacuation pleural puncture or repeated pleural punctures or pleural drainage allowing the evacuation of at least 100cc of pleural fluid
* Informed and having given its free, lit and express assent
* Patients with affiliation to the social security system

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient having undergone a thoracotomy or thoracoscopy in the six previous months
* Patient having a pneumothorax
* Patient reached of a tuberculosis
* Patient unable to carry out a measurement of the vital capacity by portable spirometer at the inclusion
* Pregnant woman or nursing
* Patient having a life expectancy lower than three months
* Proven or suspected pleural neoplasia disease
* Patient hemodynamically unstable
* Patient having a respiratory insufficiency requiring the introduction of an artificial ventilation
* Patient carrying a chronic respiratory insufficiency under non-invasive ventilation with the long course
* Patient unable to carry out the exercises of physiotherapy (problem of communication and/or comprehension and/or physical inaptitude)
* Patient transplanted of a solid body, allograft or autograft of hematopoietic stem cells
* Patient with a seropositivity for the known HIV and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) \<250/mm3
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hôpital NOVO

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frédérique MONTRELAY

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hôpital NOVO

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Victor Dupuy

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche

Brest, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Cholet

Cholet, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal - Créteil

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Dunkerque

Dunkirk, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle

La Rochelle, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Dupuytren

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier René Dubos

Pontoise, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHRD1815

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id