Investigating Fear Of Recurrence as a Modifiable Mechanism of Behavior Change
NCT ID: NCT03853213
Last Updated: 2021-09-17
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-28
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient-Centered Adherence Intervention After Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Hospitalization
NCT00903032
Increasing Adherence to Treatment Recommendations Following a Cardiac Event
NCT02327260
An Intervention to Support Medication Adherence Following Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT02967588
The Impact of Patient Involvement in Decision-Making About Heart Disease Prevention
NCT00315978
Targeted Feedback Reports to Improve Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) Care
NCT00952250
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Accumulating evidence suggests that the many patients who develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following ACS view their medications as reminders of their cardiac event and their future CVD risk. Ironically, although it has rarely been studied outside of cancer survivors, this fear of recurrence (FoR) may undermine medication adherence in ACS patients. This project will use the Science of Behavior Change (SOBC) experimental medicine approach to investigate FoR as a putative mechanism of behavior change with respect to heart medication adherence among ACS patients with early PTSD symptoms at hospital discharge. The study will test a cognitive-affective intervention that has been shown to reduce FoR in cancer survivors, that is delivered electronically (electronic tablet) in the patient's home. The intervention has been adapted in this study for ACS to be tested using a double-blind randomized controlled design. One hundred suspected ACS patients will be enrolled who reported at least mild to moderate threat perceptions at the time of their initial visit to the emergency department. FoR and future time perspective will be assessed within six weeks of the initial visit to the emergency department, and then participants will be trained on the tablet intervention. Participants will complete the intervention over four weeks in eight half-hour sessions, twice each week. Medication adherence will be measured electronically using eCAP devices. FoR and future time perspective will be reassessed 1 month after the baseline session, and cognitive-affective change will be assessed electronically throughout the intervention period.
In addition to investigating FoR as the primary mechanism of behavior change, the study also investigates a secondary potential mechanism that is a distinct, but related, construct: future time perspective. Furthermore, in addition to examining medication adherence as the primary health behavior of interest, the study also examines a secondary health behavior that is reduced in fearful cardiac patients: physical activity. Collectively, the three aims below address these two putative mechanisms (FoR, future time perspective) and these two health behaviors (medication adherence, physical activity) in the randomly assigned groups (intervention, control).
Objectives
Aim 1 (main purpose of the trial):
The study will determine whether a tablet-based cognitive bias modification treatment (CBMT) intervention influences the two putative mechanisms of fear of recurrence (FoR) and future time perspective. Of primary importance within this first aim, it will test whether the intervention reduces cardiac-related FoR relative to control. The trial is statistically powered to test the first aim as it relates to FoR. Secondarily, it will also test whether the intervention increases an expansive future time perspective relative to control.
Aim 2 (exploratory):
The study will determine the extent to which the two potential mechanisms of behavior change-FoR and future time perspective-are each associated with health behaviors. Of primary importance within this second aim, it will test associations between these two potential mechanisms of behavior change and objectively measured and self-reported adherence to heart medications (antiplatelets to reduce risk of blood clotting, antihypertensive drugs to reduce blood pressure, or statins to lower cholesterol). Of secondary importance, it will test whether these two potential mechanisms of behavior change are associated with self-reported physical activity.
Aim 3 (exploratory):
The study will test whether the intervention improves the two health behaviors of interest. Of primary importance within this third aim, it will test whether the intervention relative to control is associated with higher heart medication adherence (objectively measured or self-reported) in the two months after the baseline visit and whether any such beneficial effects are mediated by reductions in the putative mechanisms of FoR or future time perspective. Secondarily, it will test whether the intervention relative to control is associated with greater increases in self-reported physical activity in the two months after the baseline visit and whether any such beneficial effects are mediated by reductions in the putative mechanisms of FoR or future time perspective.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cognitive Bias Modification Training
Participants in this intervention group complete two tasks, each repeated 8 times over the course of 4 weeks (twice per week). The first task is Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Attention. It is designed to reinforce attention away from ACS threat-related stimuli (e.g., "death," "chest pain") and toward neutral stimuli (e.g., "curve," barn doors"). The second task is Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Interpretation. It is designed to train participants to appraise ambiguous information that is potentially related to ACS threat as benign.
Cognitive Bias Modification Training
In task 1, participants view a pair of threat-neutral words and then a single letter (E or F). Participants' task is to tap a button as quickly and accurately as possible to indicate whether they see E or F. The letter appears in the neutral location on 90.6% of trials, thereby reinforcing participants' attending away from threat. In task 2, participants view a word or phrase corresponding to a threatening (e.g., "dying") or benign (e.g., "sleep") interpretation of a sentence (e.g., "You have been waking up tired recently"). They are asked to tap a button to indicate whether the word or phrase was related to the sentence. Positive feedback ("Correct") is given for rejected threat interpretations and for benign interpretations. Otherwise, negative feedback ("Incorrect") is given.
Attention Control Training
Participants in this placebo control group complete two tasks, each repeated 8 times over the course of 4 weeks (twice per week). The first task is the placebo version of Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Attention. It is designed NOT to train attention toward or away from threatening or neutral information. The second task is the placebo version of Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Interpretation. It is designed NOT to train the interpretation of information as either threatening or benign.
Attention Control Training
In task 1, participants view a pair of threat-neutral words and then a single letter (E or F). Participants' task is to tap a button as quickly and accurately as possible to indicate whether they see E or F. The target letter is equally likely to appear in the threat location as the neutral location. Thus, participants' patterns of attention are not trained toward or away from threat. In task 2, participants view a word or short phrase corresponding to either a threatening or benign interpretation of a sentence that follows it. They are asked to tap a button to indicate whether the word or phrase was related to the sentence. Positive feedback and negative feedback are equally likely to be given regardless of whether participants endorse the threatening or benign interpretations.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Bias Modification Training
In task 1, participants view a pair of threat-neutral words and then a single letter (E or F). Participants' task is to tap a button as quickly and accurately as possible to indicate whether they see E or F. The letter appears in the neutral location on 90.6% of trials, thereby reinforcing participants' attending away from threat. In task 2, participants view a word or phrase corresponding to a threatening (e.g., "dying") or benign (e.g., "sleep") interpretation of a sentence (e.g., "You have been waking up tired recently"). They are asked to tap a button to indicate whether the word or phrase was related to the sentence. Positive feedback ("Correct") is given for rejected threat interpretations and for benign interpretations. Otherwise, negative feedback ("Incorrect") is given.
Attention Control Training
In task 1, participants view a pair of threat-neutral words and then a single letter (E or F). Participants' task is to tap a button as quickly and accurately as possible to indicate whether they see E or F. The target letter is equally likely to appear in the threat location as the neutral location. Thus, participants' patterns of attention are not trained toward or away from threat. In task 2, participants view a word or short phrase corresponding to either a threatening or benign interpretation of a sentence that follows it. They are asked to tap a button to indicate whether the word or phrase was related to the sentence. Positive feedback and negative feedback are equally likely to be given regardless of whether participants endorse the threatening or benign interpretations.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Fluent in English or Spanish;
3. A diagnosis of NSTEMI or unstable angina (UA) according to American College of Cardiology criteria;
4. Currently enrolled in the protocol titled "Testing biopsychosocial mechanisms of the posthospital syndrome \[PHS\] model of early rehospitalization in cardiac patients" (IRB-AAAR7350 at CUIMC)
5. Previously indicated "YES" to the following question in the consent form for the separate protocol (IRB-AAAR7350) in which they are enrolled and willing to be contacted about other future research projects.
6. Elevated Threat Perception score in emergency department flagged by automatic scoring (i.e., ≥ 10, the median for 1,000 ACS patients in a separate sample)
7. Currently on a daily aspirin regimen prescribed by a doctor OR currently on a daily beta-blocker or statin regimen prescribed by a doctor
8. Some comfort using technology such as electronic tablets or smartphones
Exclusion Criteria
2. Deemed to need immediate psychiatric intervention (that is, has to be hospitalized or have some other psychiatric intervention within 72 hours);
3. Unavailable for follow-up. This includes patients with a terminal noncardiovascular illness (life expectancy less than 1 year by physician report) and those who indicate they are about to leave the United States;
4. Underwent a surgical procedure within the past 24 hours and/or is scheduled for a surgical procedure within the next 24 hours.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffrey Birk
Instructor in Medical Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffrey L Birk, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lopez-Veneros D, Cumella R, Kronish IM, Lazarov A, Birk JL. Home-based cognitive bias modification training for reducing maladaptive fear in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Jan 11;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01442-2.
Birk JL, Cumella R, Lopez-Veneros D, Jurado A, Romero EK, Lazarov A, Kronish IM. Intervening on fear after acute cardiac events: Rationale and design of the INFORM randomized clinical trial. Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;39(9):736-744. doi: 10.1037/hea0000853.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAR9458
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.