Non-concealed Placebo Treatment for Menopausal Hot Flushes
NCT ID: NCT03838523
Last Updated: 2021-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-12
2020-03-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Beneficial effects of double-blind placebos were found to be high in hot flush trials.
The objective of the study is to determine whether an open-label placebo (OLP) treatment is efficacious in alleviating hot flushes and bother among peri- and postmenopausal women.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hypnosis For Hot Flashes Among Postmenopausal Women in a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT01293695
Day and Night Hot Flash During Menopause
NCT04878081
A Study to Find the Best Dose of Fezolinetant to Treat Hot Flashes in Women Going Through Menopause
NCT05034042
Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Study of an Oral Product in Subjects With Menopausal Symptoms
NCT06787443
A Study to Find Out if Fezolinetant Helps Reduce Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes in Women Going Through Menopause
NCT04003155
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of the study is to determine whether an open-label placebo (OLP) treatment is efficacious in alleviating hot flushes and bother among peri- and postmenopausal women.
In this assessor-blinded, randomized-controlled trial, women with ≥5 daily moderate to severe hot flushes of at least moderate bother are assigned 1:1 to a 4-week OLP treatment or no treatment. Both groups are informed about study objectives including a briefing about the inert nature of placebo pills, why OLP might be effective and the importance of the control group. To explore the duration and maintenance of placebo effects, participants in the OLP group are randomized a second time and divided into two subgroups who either discontinue (OLP 4wk) or continue the OLP treatment (OLP 8wk) for another 4 weeks. All participants receive three study visits: at enrolment, baseline (1 week later), and at post-treatment. A fourth study visit is conducted at 8-week follow-up with the two subgroups OLP 4wk and OLP 8wk. Qualitative interviews about subjective experiences with the OLP treatment are conducted with n = 8 women.
This trial will contribute to the evaluation of OLP treatments in clinical practice and further our understanding about the magnitude of placebo effects in hot flush treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
OLP group
At baseline, patients are given an explanation about why placebos without deception might be effective.
Women allocated to this group receive an 4-week Open Label Placebo treatment. After 4 weeks, they are randomized again to either continue or discontinue the OLP treatment for another 4 weeks.
Open Label Placebo
See group description
No-treatment group
At baseline, patients are given an explanation about why placebos without deception might be effective.
Women assigned to the no-treatment group do not receive any treatment as part of the study.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Open Label Placebo
See group description
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* all hot flushes have at least moderate ratings of bother (sum score ≥ 16 on the bother subscale of the Hot Flush Rating Scale (HFRS) \[41\]
* fluency in German language
* participants are in menopausal transition (irregularities ≥ 60 days in the past year), or postmenopausal (cessation of menstruation ≥ 1 year) \[42\].
Exclusion Criteria
* use of herbal remedies to treat hot flushes within the last 6 weeks before enrolment
* intake of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) within the last 6 weeks before enrolment
* previous oophorectomy
* severe physical or cognitive impairments which would constitute a barrier to give informed consent
* severe depression and anxiety (≥ 9 sum score or ≥ 5 depression or anxiety subscore on the Patient Health Questionnaire-4)
* medical conditions which might interact with menopausal hot flushes such as untreated hyperthyroidism, alcohol abuse (excluded when ≥4 on AUDIT-C) and cancer
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yvonne Nestoriuc
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yvonne Nestoriuc, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hunter MS, Liao KL. A psychological analysis of menopausal hot flushes. Br J Clin Psychol. 1995 Nov;34(4):589-99. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1995.tb01493.x.
Geisser ME, Clauw DJ, Strand V, Gendreau MR, Palmer R, Williams DA. Contributions of change in clinical status parameters to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores among persons with fibromyalgia treated with milnacipran. Pain. 2010 May;149(2):373-378. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.043. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
Guttuso T Jr, Kurlan R, McDermott MP, Kieburtz K. Gabapentin's effects on hot flashes in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;101(2):337-45. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02712-6.
Hunter, M. S. The women's health questionnaire: A measure of mid-aged women's perceptions of their emotional and physical health. Psychology & Health, 7(1), 45-54, 1992.
Shin H, Shin HS. Measurement of quality of life in menopausal women: a systematic review. West J Nurs Res. 2012 Jun;34(4):475-503. doi: 10.1177/0193945911402848. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
Pan Y, Meister R, Lowe B, Winkelmann A, Kaptchuk TJ, Buhling KJ, Nestoriuc Y. Non-concealed placebo treatment for menopausal hot flushes: Study protocol of a randomized-controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Aug 16;20(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3575-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1705-100
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.