Use and Misuse of Domperidone in Parkinson's Disease in France - Dump Investigation
NCT ID: NCT03837067
Last Updated: 2021-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-07-17
2018-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Domperidone, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with antiemetic properties, does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, allowing its used in PD. Domperidone may prolong the duration of the QT interval in predisposed patients, and has been associated with proarrhythmia and arrhythmic deaths. Arrhythmias, sudden death and cardiac arrest were reported with high intravenous doses which has led to withdraw of the parenteral form of the drug in 1984. Two case control studies found an increased risk of sudden death associated with domperidone use. In these reports, the increased risk was depending on age, dose, and the use of domperidone in combination with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Following the discussion created by this alert, the PRAC of the EMA has issued recommendations restricting domperidone use to patients younger than 60 years at doses below 30 mg/day and for a short period (7 days).
Because there is no alternative antiemetic drug to be used in PD, domperidone is commonly prescribed as a preventive therapy in most PD patients initiating DRT. In this population, usually older than 60 years, doses of 60 or 80 mg/day are commonly prescribed, for at least 2 months of the DRT escalating dose period or longer. A particular "niche" of domperidone misuse might be patients treated with continuous subcutaneous administration of apomorphine, a second line therapy in PD, inducing severe and prolonged nausea in almost all patients. Little is known about the use of domperidone in PD in France, but misuse of domperidone in PD patients is probably very high. Data collected from two French PD cohorts, COPARK and DIGPD, showed that 8-14% of PD patients were treated with domperidone.
The aim of this proposal is to investigate the practices and beliefs of French neurologists regarding use and misuse of domperidone in PD, by a qualitative approach.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use and Misuse of Domperidone in Parkinson's Disease in France - Observational
NCT04653584
Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of DA-9701 With Domperidone in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT03022201
Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals
NCT03693872
Buspirone Treatment of Iatrogenic Dyskinesias in Advanced Parkinson' Disease
NCT02617017
Randomized Clinical Trial of Donepezil for the Treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease
NCT05709301
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Domperidone is a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with antiemetic properties. Domperidone does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, allowing its used in PD. Domperidone may prolong the duration of the QT interval in predisposed patients, and has been associated with proarrhythmia and arrhythmic deaths. Arrhythmias, sudden death and cardiac arrest were reported with high intravenous doses which has led to withdraw of the parenteral form of the drug in 1984. More recently, two case control studies found an increased risk of sudden death associated with domperidone use. In these reports, the increased risk was depending on age, dose, and the use of domperidone in combination with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Following the discussion created by this alert, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued recommendations restricting domperidone use to patients younger than 60 years at doses below 30 mg/day and for a short period (7 days).
Because there is no alternative antiemetic drug to be used in PD, domperidone is commonly prescribed as a preventive therapy in most PD patients initiating DRT since more than 30 years. In this population, usually older than 60 years, doses of 60 or 80 mg/day are commonly prescribed, for at least 2 months of the DRT escalating dose period or longer. A particular "niche" of domperidone misuse might be patients treated with continuous subcutaneous administration of apomorphine, a second line therapy in PD, inducing severe and prolonged nausea in almost all patients. Little is known about the use of domperidone in PD in France in clinical practice, but misuse of domperidone in PD patients is probably very high. Data collected from two French PD cohorts, COPARK and DIGPD, showed that 8-14% of PD patients were treated with domperidone, extrapolating 10,000 to 20,000 potentially exposed patients at particularly high risk of sudden death.
The aim of this proposal is to investigate the practices and beliefs of French neurologists regarding use and misuse of domperidone in PD, by a qualitative approach. Practices of domperidone prescription by neurologists (from university and general hospitals and private offices) will be evaluated using a semi-structured questionnaire survey. This qualitative study will provide insights from the neurologists on their need for domperidone, therapeutic alternatives and their perceived efficacy, and on the domperidone management and safety procedures that are applied to PD patients before and after domperidone prescription.
The results of this survey on regular practices of neurologists on the use and misuse of domperidone will provide information of the current opinions about the drug, the indications for which it is prescribed, how contra-indications are evaluated, and their feedback on tolerance and efficacy. This information will help Regulatory Authorities to communicate about the safety profile of the drug.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DUMP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.