Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

NCT ID: NCT03831087

Last Updated: 2023-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

267 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-30

Study Completion Date

2023-08-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To prove the non-inferiority of TAVR-CMR compared to TAVR-CT to guide TAVR according to clinical efficacy, defined as implantation success based on the VARC-2 criteria.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Title: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR-CMR).

Coordinating Prinicpal Investigator: Prof. Bernhard Metzler, University Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Innsbruck Medical University.

Planned Study Period: 2017-2023.

Objective: To investigate, for the first time, the non-inferiority of TAVR-CMR to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (TAVR-CT) regarding efficacy and safety end-points.

Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-centre trial.

Patients (planned): 270 patients.

Diagnosis / Inclusion Criteria: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVR based on a local heart-team decision.

Methods: Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive a predefined TAVR-CMR protocol or to receive a standard TAVR-CT protocol within two weeks after inclusion.

Main Outcome Measure: Follow-up will be performed at hospital discharge after TAVR and after 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome is device implantation success at discharge. The secondary endpoints are a combined safety endpoint and a combined clinical efficacy endpoint at baseline and at 6 months, as well as a comparison of imaging procedure related variables (see section 5.11.2). Endpoint definitions are based on the updated 2012 VARC-2 consensus document.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAVR-CMR

All MR examinations will be performed with a 1.5-T clinical MR imaging unit (AVANTO\_fit; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The MR protocol consists of a Navigator-gated free breathing 3D "whole-heart" coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), axial 2D true fast imaging with steady-state free precession (true-FISP) during free breathing covering whole body trunk and a coronal 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) Gd-MRA.

Group Type OTHER

TAVR-CMR

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CMR protocol for the exact determination of the aortic valve dimensions, valve size and implantation route.

TAVR-CT

All CT examinations will be performed on a 128-slice dual-source CT and high-pitch factor. Prospective electrocardiographic synchronization will be applied, triggered into the diastolic phase for the heart. An injected bolus of 70 to 110 mL of nonionic iodine contrast agent will be applied with 370 mg/mL iodine concentration, using an automatic injector at a flow rate of 5 mL/s, followed by 40 mL saline solution. Contrast agent volume for each patient will be calculated by scan time and body weight. Patients will be placed supine with arms overhead. The scan length range from supraaortic branches to the groins.

Group Type OTHER

TAVR-CT

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CT protocol for the exact determination of the aortic valve dimensions, valve size and implantation route.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAVR-CMR

CMR protocol for the exact determination of the aortic valve dimensions, valve size and implantation route.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

TAVR-CT

CT protocol for the exact determination of the aortic valve dimensions, valve size and implantation route.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Signed informed consent
2. Severe aortic stenosis according to recent guidelines (aortic valve area ≤ 1.0cm² or aortic valve index ≤ 0.6 cm²/m²) (1)
3. Typical symptoms of severe aortic stenosis like shortness of breath, angina or syncope
4. Patient is evaluated for TAVR

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindications to perform CMR
2. Contraindications to perform CT
3. Contraindications for TAVR or reduced life expectancy \< 1 year.
4. Known hypersensitivity to CMR or CT contrast agents
5. Childbearing potential or inability to exclude pregnancy
6. Inability to understand and follow study-related instructions
7. Severe renal insufficiency requiring renal replacement therapy
8. Severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh class B or C)
9. Post organ transplantation
10. Participation in another clinical study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johannes Kepler University of Linz

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University Innsbruck

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernhard Metzler, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University Innsbruck

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Clinic of Internal Medicine III

Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lechner I, Oberhollenzer F, Tiller C, Holzknecht M, Kaser A, Binder RK, Gollmann-Tepekoylu C, Klug G, Mayr A, Bauer A, Metzler B, Reindl M, Reinstadler SJ. Age and sex-related outcomes in cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus computed tomography-guided transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Summer;27(1):101882. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101882. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40089160 (View on PubMed)

Reindl M, Lechner I, Holzknecht M, Tiller C, Fink P, Oberhollenzer F, von der Emde S, Pamminger M, Troger F, Kremser C, Lassnig E, Danninger K, Binder RK, Ulmer H, Brenner C, Klug G, Bauer A, Metzler B, Mayr A, Reinstadler SJ. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority Trial. Circulation. 2023 Oct 17;148(16):1220-1230. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066498. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37634187 (View on PubMed)

Klug G, Reinstadler S, Troger F, Holzknecht M, Reindl M, Tiller C, Lechner I, Fink P, Pamminger M, Kremser C, Ulmer H, Bauer A, Metzler B, Mayr A. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement: study protocol for a randomized trial (TAVR-CMR). Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06638-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36056444 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20171002-1653

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TAVR With Echocardiography Guidance
NCT07035847 RECRUITING NA