Trial Outcomes & Findings for Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (MK-7625A) Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem for Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (MK-7625A-015) (NCT NCT03830333)
NCT ID: NCT03830333
Last Updated: 2023-01-17
Results Overview
Clinical response was classified as "cure" or "failure". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure or clinical failure at TOC was summarized.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
268 participants
Up to approximately Day 30
2023-01-17
Participant Flow
Adult participants with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) were recruited at 21 study sites in China. Participants with severe impairment of renal function (estimated creatinine clearance \[CrCL\] \<30 mL/min) were excluded.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
134
|
134
|
|
Overall Study
Clinically Evaluable Population
|
105
|
116
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
126
|
130
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Discontinuations associated with failure to return for follow-up assessments due to COVID-19
|
3
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (MK-7625A) Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem for Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (MK-7625A-015)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Total
n=268 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 • n=5 Participants
|
51.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 • n=7 Participants
|
49.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
164 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
268 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
268 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary Site of Infection
Bowel (small or large)
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary Site of Infection
Other site of infection
|
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
255 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30Population: All participants of the CE population who met the protocol definition of cIAI, had no significant protocol deviations, received the minimum duration of randomized IV study therapy, and had an efficacy assessment of cure or failure at the TOC visit were analyzed.
Clinical response was classified as "cure" or "failure". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure or clinical failure at TOC was summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=105 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=116 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
|
95.2 Percentage of Participants
|
93.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
|
4.8 Percentage of Participants
|
6.9 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to, irrespective of what they actually received.
Clinical response was classified as "cure", "failure", or "indeterminate". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. Indeterminate (unfavorable) was defined as participants for whom study data were not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure, clinical failure, or indeterminate at TOC was summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at TOC Visit: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
|
85.1 Percentage of Participants
|
89.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at TOC Visit: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
|
14.2 Percentage of Participants
|
9.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at TOC Visit: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Indeterminate (unfavorable)
|
0.7 Percentage of Participants
|
0.7 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 15Population: All participants of the CE population who met the protocol definition of cIAI, had no significant protocol deviations, received the minimum duration of randomized IV study therapy, and had an efficacy assessment of cure or failure at the EOT visit were analyzed.
Clinical response was classified as "cure" or "failure". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure or clinical failure at EOT was summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=105 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=116 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit: CE Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
|
98.1 Percentage of Participants
|
96.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit: CE Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
|
1.9 Percentage of Participants
|
3.4 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 15Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to, irrespective of what they actually received.
Clinical response was classified as "cure", "failure", or "indeterminate". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. Indeterminate (unfavorable) was defined as participants for whom study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure, clinical failure, or indeterminate at EOT was summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at EOT Visit: ITT Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
|
92.5 Percentage of Participants
|
94.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at EOT Visit: ITT Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
|
7.5 Percentage of Participants
|
4.5 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at EOT Visit: ITT Population
Indeterminate (unfavorable)
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
|
1.5 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30Population: The EME population consisted of all randomized participants who had cIAI as evidenced by identification of at least 1 baseline intra-abdominal pathogen, regardless of susceptibility to study drug and met all CE population criteria.
An overall microbiological response was determined by the Sponsor for each participant based on individual microbiological responses for each baseline bacterial pathogen. A favorable individual microbiological response was eradication (absence of the baseline bacterial pathogen in a specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection) or presumed eradication (absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as a clinical cure). In order for the participant to have a favorable overall microbiological response, each individual baseline bacterial pathogen must have had a favorable microbiological outcome. The percentage of participants with a favorable per-participant microbiological response of eradication or presumed eradication was reported for the TOC visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=54 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication at TOC Visit: Expanded Microbiologically Evaluable (EME) Population
|
94.4 Percentage of Participants
|
93.2 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30Population: The EME population consisted of all randomized participants with data available who had cIAI as evidenced by identification of at least 1 baseline intra-abdominal pathogen, regardless of susceptibility to study drug and met all CE population criteria.
A microbiological response was determined for each bacterial pathogen isolated at baseline by the Sponsor. Favorable microbiological responses included eradication (absence of the baseline bacterial pathogen in a specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection) or presumed eradication (absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as a clinical cure). The percentage of participants with a favorable microbiological response of eradication or presumed eradication was reported per pathogen for the TOC visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=54 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-negative aerobes
|
94.0 Percentage of Participants
|
95.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
All Enterobacteriaceae
|
93.8 Percentage of Participants
|
95.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Citrobacter freundii complex
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Citrobacter koseri
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Enterobacter aerogenes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Other Enterobacter spp.
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Escherichia coli
|
93.8 Percentage of Participants
|
95.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Klebsiella oxytoca
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Klebsiella pneumoniae
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
90.9 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Morganella morganii
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Proteus mirabilis
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Aeromonas hydrophila
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
|
75.0 Percentage of Participants
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-positive aerobes
|
80.0 Percentage of Participants
|
88.2 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-negative anaerobes
|
—
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-positive anaerobes
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
100.0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30Population: The All Participants as Treated (APaT) population was used for the analysis of safety data in this study. The APaT population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants who experienced 1 or more AEs were summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 1 or More Adverse Events (AEs)
|
50.0 Percentage of Participants
|
50.7 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Day 14Population: The APaT population was used for the analysis of safety data in this study. The APaT population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants who had study drug discontinued during the study due to an AE was summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants That Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
|
2.2 Percentage of Participants
|
2.2 Percentage of Participants
|
Adverse Events
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
Meropenem + Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal infection
|
1.5%
2/134 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
1.5%
2/134 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary mycosis
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
6.0%
8/134 • Number of events 9 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
6.0%
8/134 • Number of events 8 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
8.2%
11/134 • Number of events 12 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
6.7%
9/134 • Number of events 11 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
10.4%
14/134 • Number of events 15 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
5.2%
7/134 • Number of events 7 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
1.5%
2/134 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.2%
7/134 • Number of events 7 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
6.7%
9/134 • Number of events 9 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If publication activity is not directed by the Sponsor, the investigator agrees to submit all manuscripts or abstracts to the Sponsor before submission. This allows the Sponsor to protect proprietary information and to provide comments.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER