Trial Outcomes & Findings for Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (MK-7625A) Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem for Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (MK-7625A-015) (NCT NCT03830333)

NCT ID: NCT03830333

Last Updated: 2023-01-17

Results Overview

Clinical response was classified as "cure" or "failure". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure or clinical failure at TOC was summarized.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

268 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to approximately Day 30

Results posted on

2023-01-17

Participant Flow

Adult participants with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) were recruited at 21 study sites in China. Participants with severe impairment of renal function (estimated creatinine clearance \[CrCL\] \<30 mL/min) were excluded.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Overall Study
STARTED
134
134
Overall Study
Clinically Evaluable Population
105
116
Overall Study
COMPLETED
126
130
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
8
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Overall Study
Death
0
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
5
1
Overall Study
Discontinuations associated with failure to return for follow-up assessments due to COVID-19
3
2

Baseline Characteristics

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (MK-7625A) Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem for Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (MK-7625A-015)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Total
n=268 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 • n=5 Participants
51.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 • n=7 Participants
49.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.0 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
164 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
134 Participants
n=7 Participants
268 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
134 Participants
n=7 Participants
268 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Primary Site of Infection
Bowel (small or large)
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Primary Site of Infection
Other site of infection
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
255 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30

Population: All participants of the CE population who met the protocol definition of cIAI, had no significant protocol deviations, received the minimum duration of randomized IV study therapy, and had an efficacy assessment of cure or failure at the TOC visit were analyzed.

Clinical response was classified as "cure" or "failure". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure or clinical failure at TOC was summarized.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=105 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=116 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
95.2 Percentage of Participants
93.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
4.8 Percentage of Participants
6.9 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to, irrespective of what they actually received.

Clinical response was classified as "cure", "failure", or "indeterminate". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. Indeterminate (unfavorable) was defined as participants for whom study data were not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure, clinical failure, or indeterminate at TOC was summarized.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at TOC Visit: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
85.1 Percentage of Participants
89.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at TOC Visit: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
14.2 Percentage of Participants
9.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at TOC Visit: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
Indeterminate (unfavorable)
0.7 Percentage of Participants
0.7 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 15

Population: All participants of the CE population who met the protocol definition of cIAI, had no significant protocol deviations, received the minimum duration of randomized IV study therapy, and had an efficacy assessment of cure or failure at the EOT visit were analyzed.

Clinical response was classified as "cure" or "failure". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure or clinical failure at EOT was summarized.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=105 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=116 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit: CE Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
98.1 Percentage of Participants
96.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure or Clinical Failure) at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit: CE Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
1.9 Percentage of Participants
3.4 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 15

Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT population were analyzed based on the treatment they were randomized to, irrespective of what they actually received.

Clinical response was classified as "cure", "failure", or "indeterminate". Clinical cure (favorable) was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure is required for the index infection. Clinical failure (unfavorable) was defined as death related to IAI at any time point; persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen requiring additional intervention to cure; need for treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing IAI symptoms; or post-surgical wound infection that requires additional antimicrobial therapy and/or non-routing wound care. Indeterminate (unfavorable) was defined as participants for whom study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. The percentage of participants with clinical response of clinical cure, clinical failure, or indeterminate at EOT was summarized.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at EOT Visit: ITT Population
Clinical Cure (favorable)
92.5 Percentage of Participants
94.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at EOT Visit: ITT Population
Clinical Failure (unfavorable)
7.5 Percentage of Participants
4.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response (Clinical Cure, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate) at EOT Visit: ITT Population
Indeterminate (unfavorable)
0.0 Percentage of Participants
1.5 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30

Population: The EME population consisted of all randomized participants who had cIAI as evidenced by identification of at least 1 baseline intra-abdominal pathogen, regardless of susceptibility to study drug and met all CE population criteria.

An overall microbiological response was determined by the Sponsor for each participant based on individual microbiological responses for each baseline bacterial pathogen. A favorable individual microbiological response was eradication (absence of the baseline bacterial pathogen in a specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection) or presumed eradication (absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as a clinical cure). In order for the participant to have a favorable overall microbiological response, each individual baseline bacterial pathogen must have had a favorable microbiological outcome. The percentage of participants with a favorable per-participant microbiological response of eradication or presumed eradication was reported for the TOC visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=54 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication at TOC Visit: Expanded Microbiologically Evaluable (EME) Population
94.4 Percentage of Participants
93.2 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30

Population: The EME population consisted of all randomized participants with data available who had cIAI as evidenced by identification of at least 1 baseline intra-abdominal pathogen, regardless of susceptibility to study drug and met all CE population criteria.

A microbiological response was determined for each bacterial pathogen isolated at baseline by the Sponsor. Favorable microbiological responses included eradication (absence of the baseline bacterial pathogen in a specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection) or presumed eradication (absence of material to culture in a participant who is assessed as a clinical cure). The percentage of participants with a favorable microbiological response of eradication or presumed eradication was reported per pathogen for the TOC visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=54 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=73 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-negative aerobes
94.0 Percentage of Participants
95.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
All Enterobacteriaceae
93.8 Percentage of Participants
95.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Citrobacter freundii complex
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Citrobacter koseri
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Enterobacter aerogenes
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Enterobacter cloacae complex
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Other Enterobacter spp.
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Escherichia coli
93.8 Percentage of Participants
95.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Klebsiella oxytoca
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Klebsiella pneumoniae
100.0 Percentage of Participants
90.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Morganella morganii
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Proteus mirabilis
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Aeromonas hydrophila
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
75.0 Percentage of Participants
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-positive aerobes
80.0 Percentage of Participants
88.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-negative anaerobes
100.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological Response of Eradication or Presumed Eradication, by Pathogen, at the TOC Visit: EME Population
Gram-positive anaerobes
100.0 Percentage of Participants
100.0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to approximately Day 30

Population: The All Participants as Treated (APaT) population was used for the analysis of safety data in this study. The APaT population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants who experienced 1 or more AEs were summarized.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced 1 or More Adverse Events (AEs)
50.0 Percentage of Participants
50.7 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Day 14

Population: The APaT population was used for the analysis of safety data in this study. The APaT population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants who had study drug discontinued during the study due to an AE was summarized.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 Participants
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 Participants
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Percentage of Participants That Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
2.2 Percentage of Participants
2.2 Percentage of Participants

Adverse Events

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 28 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Meropenem + Placebo

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 33 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
General disorders
Death
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Abdominal infection
1.5%
2/134 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
1.5%
2/134 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary mycosis
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/134 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam + Metronidazole
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received ceftolozane/tazobactam 1500 mg (ceftolozane 1000 mg + tazobactam 500 mg) plus metronidazole 500 mg administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam could be adjusted to 500 mg/250 mg if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Meropenem + Placebo
n=134 participants at risk
Participants received meropenem 1000 mg plus saline administered as an IV infusion every 8 hours for 4 to 14 days (per protocol, meropenem could be adjusted to every 12 hours if CrCL was 30 to ≤50 mL/min).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
6.0%
8/134 • Number of events 9 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
6.0%
8/134 • Number of events 8 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
8.2%
11/134 • Number of events 12 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
General disorders
Pyrexia
6.7%
9/134 • Number of events 11 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
10.4%
14/134 • Number of events 15 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
5.2%
7/134 • Number of events 7 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
1.5%
2/134 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
5.2%
7/134 • Number of events 7 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
6.7%
9/134 • Number of events 9 • Up to approximately Day 30
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Additional Information

Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Phone: 1-800-672-6372

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If publication activity is not directed by the Sponsor, the investigator agrees to submit all manuscripts or abstracts to the Sponsor before submission. This allows the Sponsor to protect proprietary information and to provide comments.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER