CompuFlo Thoracic Epidural Study

NCT ID: NCT03826186

Last Updated: 2022-10-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-26

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Traditionally, loss-of-resistance (LOR) to air or saline with a special ground-glass syringe is the technique used to identify epidural space, but failure rates up to 30% have been reported using this technique for thoracic epidural placement. This failure rate has sparked the search for newer techniques to improve the success rate for placement.The CompuFlo epidural system is a device that provides anesthesiologists and other healthcare providers the ability to quantitatively determine and document the pressure at the needle tip in real time. The device's proprietary dynamic pressure sensing technology (DPS) allows it to provide objective visual and audible in-tissue pressure feedback that allows anesthesiologists to identify the epidural space. The purpose this research study is to compare the success rate of the two different approaches (traditional method v/s CompuFlo assisted) to thoracic epidural placement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditional technique vs CompuFlo use: Using the traditional technique (loss-of-resistance technique), the epidural needle is advanced through the subcutaneous tissues with the needle stylet in place until the needle tip is positioned in the interspinous ligament-this is noted by the proceduralist by an increase in tissue resistance (attempted injection into ligamentous tissue is met with high resistance). The stylet or introducer is removed, and a ground-glass syringe filled with 2-3 mL of saline with an air bubble is attached to the hub of the epidural needle. If the tip of the needle is within the ligament, gentle attempts at injection are met with resistance, and injection of the saline is not possible. The needle is then slowly advanced, millimeter by millimeter, with either continuous or rapidly repeating attempts at injection. As the tip of the needle enters the posterior epidural space, a sudden loss of resistance is noted, and the saline injects easily. Once the needle tip is in the epidural space, the epidural catheter is threaded through the needle and the needle is removed, leaving the catheter sited in the epidural space.

The CompuFlo technique complements this basic technique. Similar to the traditional technique, the needle is advanced through the subcutaneous tissues with the stylet in place until the interspinous ligament is entered, as noted by an increase in tissue resistance. After removing the stylet, flexible tubing from the CompuFlo disposable tubing-syringe set is attached to the hub of the needle instead of the traditional ground-glass syringe. The fluid-filled syringe is placed in the CompuFlo device. The needle is then advanced continuously with the device electronically sensing pressure in real time, providing a numerical value (100 to 150 mm Hg) on the read-out screen. As the tip of the needle enters the posterior epidural space, a sudden loss of resistance (associated with a significant loss of pressure to less than 50 mm Hg or 50% of the starting pressure) is noted. The pressure drop needs to be sustained for at least 5 seconds. An audio signal also signals the acute change in pressure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Thoracic epidurals are administered. After randomization, one group will receive thoracic epidurals in the traditional way (control group) and the other with CompuFlo assistance (study group).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Traditional epidural group

The traditional approach to placing thoracic epidurals by loss-of-resistance technique using a ground glass syringe will be used in this group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional (loss-of-resistance technique) thoracic epidural placement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Thoracic epidurals will be administered using the traditional loss-of resistance technique.

CompuFlo epidural group

This device (CompuFlo) will aid in correct placement of the epidural by electronically sensing pressure in real time and by providing a numerical value on a read out screen to determine a loss of resistance. There is also an audio signal that signals a loss of resistance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CompuFlo thoracic epidural placement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pressure sensing technology to consistently and accurately identify the thoracic epidural space.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Traditional (loss-of-resistance technique) thoracic epidural placement

Thoracic epidurals will be administered using the traditional loss-of resistance technique.

Intervention Type DEVICE

CompuFlo thoracic epidural placement

Pressure sensing technology to consistently and accurately identify the thoracic epidural space.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 18 to 70
* BMI: 18 to 50 kg/m2
* Require pain control for major thoracic or abdominal surgeries
* Require pain control for rib fractures
* English is the subject's first language
* Must be able to signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Age: Less than 18 and older than 70
* Must be free of significant valvular heart disease
* Pregnant women
* Prisoners
* Contraindication to thoracic epidural anesthesia
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
* Unable to provide written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

YATISH SIDDAPURA RANGANATH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

YATISH SIDDAPURA RANGANATH

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yatish S Ranganath, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14612482 (View on PubMed)

Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K, Schricker T, Trudel J, Belliveau P. Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2002 Sep;97(3):540-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00005.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12218518 (View on PubMed)

Popping DM, Elia N, Marret E, Remy C, Tramer MR. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):990-9; discussion 1000. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.990.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18936379 (View on PubMed)

Leurcharusmee P, Arnuntasupakul V, Chora De La Garza D, Vijitpavan A, Ah-Kye S, Saelao A, Tiyaprasertkul W, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):694-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000313.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26469364 (View on PubMed)

Parra MC, Washburn K, Brown JR, Beach ML, Yeager MP, Barr P, Bonham K, Lamb K, Loftus RW. Fluoroscopic Guidance Increases the Incidence of Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement Within the Epidural Space: A Randomized Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):17-24. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000519.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27922948 (View on PubMed)

Gong Y, Shi H, Wu J, Labu D, Sun J, Zhong H, Li L, Xin X, Wang L, Wu L, Ma D. Pressure waveform-guided epidural catheter placement in comparison to the loss-of-resistance conventional method. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Aug;26(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25172504 (View on PubMed)

Ranganath YS, Ramanujam V, Al-Hassan Q, Sibenaller Z, Seering MS, Singh TSS, Punia S, Parra MC, Wong CA, Sondekoppam RV. Loss-of-Resistance Versus Dynamic Pressure-Sensing Technology for Successful Placement of Thoracic Epidural Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2024 Jul 1;139(1):201-210. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006792. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38190338 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201812716

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nerve Access Tool Study
NCT00942474 WITHDRAWN NA
Safe-Infusion Study
NCT06727240 RECRUITING NA