Comparing PPG-based Blood Pressure Measurement to the Gold Standard Manometer
NCT ID: NCT03810586
Last Updated: 2020-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-15
2020-06-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accuracy of a Cuffless Photoplethysmography (PPG) Chest-Patch Monitor for 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)
NCT07240831
Evaluation of a New Blood Pressure Measuring Device.
NCT00265707
The Effect of Frequent Self Measurements of Blood Pressure on the Control of Hypertension
NCT00459017
Mercury Versus Automated Blood Pressure Monitoring
NCT01753895
Somnotouch-NIBP Compared to Standard Ambulatory 24 Hours Blood Pressure Measurement
NCT03054688
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ambulatory BP monitoring for a period of 24 hours is considered to be better than measurements taken in a clinic setting. First, 24 hours monitoring performed at home can help confirm that hypertension actually does exist, thus ruling out the potential of "white coat syndrome". Second, measurements of BP during sleep also have a predictive value for hypertension in high risk patients. Furthermore, ambulatory BP measurements are a stronger predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality than BP measurements in the clinic. Finally, continuous BP monitoring is beneficial for controlling hypertension in diagnosed and treated patients.
The gold standard ambulatory non-invasive BP monitor that is in broad use today is a sphygmomanometer-based device that includes a cuff, which contracts around the patient's arm and measures BP every 15 to 20 minutes. The cuff is usually uncomfortable for the patients and could prevent them from doing their everyday activities. It can also disrupt the quality of their sleep at night. For these reasons patients are sometimes reluctant to use it. A more comfortable, user- friendly device, which allows a non-invasive, continuous BP measurement will provide a simple, more efficient way for BP monitoring, and will potentially enable to improve the outcome of medical treatment.
A new way for continuous non-invasive BP monitoring is based on the reflective photo plethysmography (PPG) method. A company called "Biobeat" invented a device that measures PPG wave in high temporal resolution that maintains more properties and markings of the original pulse wave than usual PPG-based devices, thereby enabling to provide data on several physiological parameters other than Heart Rate (HR) and blood oxygen saturation, such as: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and its variation, Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and its variation, Pulse Pressure and more. This device can also send and surveillance. The Biobeat device (BB-613) includes either a wearable watch or a patch with a sticker that the patient puts on his/her body. This device may increase the patient's willingness to use it and can also make the measurement more reliable (explanation on the PPG-based sensor and the device itself are provided in the appendixes).
The measurements are transferred via Wi-Fi to the patient's doctor and allows close monitoring.
The purpose of the study The study's main purpose is to compare continuous 24-hour BP measurement using the non-invasive PPG-based BB-613 device with one of the gold standard sphygmomanometer-based devices that is currently-used throughout the Israeli health system (HUGECARE NIBP Monitor). As accepted according to the AAMI (Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation) and the European Hypertension Society, the parameters that are investigated in this study will be systolic BP, diastolic BP and the average between them (MAP).
The use of the PPG sensor for BP measurement will be considered as successful if there will be correlation of at least 5/10/15 mmHg between the measurements of both the PPG sensor and the sphygmomanometer-based Holter. The difference between measurements of the PPG and manometer devices will be less than 5 mmHg in at least 75% of the measurements, less than 10 mmHg in at least 90% of the measurements and less than 15 mmHg in at least 96% of the measurements. The results will fulfil at least two of these criteria.
In addition to the BP measurement comparison, in this study the investigators will also compare the degree of comfort and accessibility for participants between the Bio Beat device and the gold standard Holter device that is currently in use.
Study hypothesis The study's hypothesis is that the PPG-based sensor will give reliable results of continuous BP monitoring in a comfortable and user-friendly way. In addition, the accuracy of the sensor will not be inferior to the Holter that is now in use.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Comparing blood pressure measurement
In each volunteer, non-invasive measurements of blood pressure will be taken at the same time using a holter manometry device (HUGECARE NIBP Monitor) and the Biobeat BB-613 device, and compared, to show the accuracy and the comparability of the BB-613. As mentioned in the protocol, there would be no medical interventions within the scope of this study. In case hypertension will be observed in a volunteer, the volunteer will be advised by the investigators to see his physician for further evaluation.
Non-invasive measurement of blood pressure
Comparing non-invasive measurement of blood pressure using the PPG-based BB-613 device to a blood pressure manomtry holter device (HUGECARE NIBP Monitor)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-invasive measurement of blood pressure
Comparing non-invasive measurement of blood pressure using the PPG-based BB-613 device to a blood pressure manomtry holter device (HUGECARE NIBP Monitor)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are currently in hospitalization or in medical assessment.
* Pregnant women and children under 18.
* Volunteers with powerless jurisdiction.
* Workers of the Hadassah Medical Center
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biobeat Technologies Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dean Nachman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hadassah Ein Kerem Medical Center, Jerusalem
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Hadassah Ein Kerem Medical Center
Jerusalem, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nachman D, Gilan A, Goldstein N, Constantini K, Littman R, Eisenkraft A, Grossman E, Gepner Y. Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement Using a Novel Noninvasive, Cuffless, Wireless Device. Am J Hypertens. 2021 Nov 20;34(11):1171-1180. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab095.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Biobeat002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.