Reactive vs. Proactive Pain Control in IBD

NCT ID: NCT03798405

Last Updated: 2022-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will compare two physician behaviors for managing pain in patients with IBD: proactive vs. reactive. Both the proactive and reactive behavior/strategies are standard of care at the institution in which the study will be performed. The PROACTIVE strategy is an IBD-specific analgesic orderset (built into our EMR and approved by the institution's Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee), the REACTIVE strategy is a traditional "reactive" analgesic prescribing (prescribing medications only when patients have pain). The PROACTIVE IBD-specific analgesic orderset consists of medications which have evidence for use in IBD-related pain. This orderset is an educational guide, it does not force any order. The reactive prescribing habits could contain an array of pain medications depending on what the provider wants to prescribe.

Aims:

Aim 1: To assess whether there is a difference in pain scores or functional activity among hospitalized patients with IBD between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 2: To assess whether there is a difference in inpatient opioid-prescribing between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Aim 3: To assess whether there is a difference in health care utilization, including length-of-stay and 30-day readmission, between reactive vs proactive physician behaviors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, investigator-blinded, single-institution randomized-control trial . Consecutive adult patients with IBD (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis) admitted to the hospital will be screened for eligibility, and eligible patients will be approached and consented to participate. Subjects will be randomized to receive the P.A.I.N.-Sparing bundle or usual care. Patient randomization will be stratified by provider to avoid bias, using a web-based in-house system (RANDI3). Subjects will also be provided with a fitness tracker (Fitbit(R)) to measure functional status during their hospital stay.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Pain Opioid Use Crohn Disease Ulcerative Colitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Consecutive patients with IBD admitted to the hospital will be screened, and eligible patients will be consented. Patients who have a pain score \> 0 and require pain control will randomly receive the reactive traditional prescribing or the proactive standard-of-care orderset guideline - all patients will receive a FitBit exercise tracker.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The primary investigators will be blinded, as will the computer programmers who collect the data.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Proactive

Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing:

Pain management in patients in the proactive physician-behavior group will be based on the IBD Pain orderset in our EMR. This orderset is already in use and standard-of-care at Cedars. The orderset uses pain medications, which have evidence for use in IBD. The orderset is simply a guide to clinicians and does not force any doctor or patient to be in a "protocol".

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Medications suggested to the physician with enhanced ease of ordering.

Reactive (Control Group)

Pain management in patients in the reactive group (control group) will follow traditional prescribing habits. As different providers vary in the way they treat pain, analgesic medication prescribing in the control group will be inherently variable in nature. The control group does not constitute a lack of treatment or placebo; rather, pain management in the control group will not be proactive as in the intervention group.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Proactive Analgesic Inpatient Narcotic-Sparing

Medications suggested to the physician with enhanced ease of ordering.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

P.A.I.N.-Sparing Bundle

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults with confirmed IBD diagnosis
* Admitted for primary IBD-related sign or symptom

Exclusion Criteria

* Admitted for primary non-IBD complaint
* Surgery in the last 30 days
* Alternative (non-IBD) GI diagnosis determined
* Age \<18
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gil Melmed

co-Director, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gil Y Melmed, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Sameer K Berry, MD, MBA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Berry SK, Takakura W, Patel D, Govalan R, Ghafari A, Kiefer E, Huang SC, Bresee C, Nuckols TK, Melmed GY. A randomized controlled trial of a proactive analgesic protocol demonstrates reduced opioid use among hospitalized adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 16;13(1):22396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48126-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38104145 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00050742

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pentoxifylline in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
NCT07349472 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2