Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-29
2023-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevention of Post-TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy by Administration of Rifaximin and Lactulose
NCT04073290
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis- Assessment of Impact on Prognosis and Short-term Outcome
NCT03827772
Effect of Brief Dietary Intervention on Ammonia Levels
NCT05376488
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Decompensated Cirrhosis
NCT04842539
A Retrospective, Open-label, Uncontrolled Cohort Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Lactulose Retention Enema in the Treatment of Cirrhotic Patients With Grade 3 or 4 (West Haven Criteria) Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE) [The RETRO Study]
NCT02377947
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy
Rationale and Supporting Evidence:
Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.
The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.
Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.
The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over \>1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.
Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (HE and related hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in patients with cirrhosis and HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.
Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Group 1: Dual oral and rectal FMT, Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo, Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT and Group 4: Oral and rectal placebo
OTHER
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Placebo
Placebo
Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT
Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30
Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema
FMT enema
Placebo
Placebo
Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo
Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules
Oral capsules of FMT
Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT
Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30
Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules
Oral capsules of FMT
Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema
FMT enema
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules
Oral capsules of FMT
Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema
FMT enema
Placebo
Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Liver Biopsy
* Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension
* Laboratory evidence of platelet count \<100,000 or AST/ALT ratio\>1
* Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy
* Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis
* On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
* Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam\>25 at the time of consenting)
* Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study
* Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
Exclusion Criteria
* WBC count \<1000 cells/mm3
* Platelet count\<25,000/mm3
* TIPS in place for less than a month
* Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin
* Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed)
* Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month
* Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test)
* Patients who are incarcerated
* Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent
* Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons:
* HIV infection (any CD4 count)
* Inherited/primary immune disorders
* Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent
* Current or recent (\<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications \[including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil\].
* Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll
* Patients on renal replacement therapy
* Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer
* Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease
* ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis
* eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease
* Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months
* Enema-related
* Platelet count\<25,000
* Grade IV hemorrhoids
* Safety-related:
* Dysphagia
* History of aspiration, gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction
* Ongoing antibiotic use (except for Rifaximin)
* Severe anaphylactic food allergy
* Allergy to ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe in the FMT capsules (glycerol, sodium chloride, hypromellose, gellan gum, titanium dioxide, theobroma oil)
* Adverse event attributable to prior FMT
* ASA Class IV or V
* Pregnant or nursing patients
* Acute illness or fever within 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
* Immunocompromised due to medical conditions
* Probiotics use within the last 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
* Any condition that the physician investigators deem unsafe, including other conditions or medications that the investigator determines puts the participant at greater risk from FMT
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bloom PP, Bajaj JS. The Current and Future State of Microbiome Therapeutics in Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 1;119(1S):S36-S41. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002581. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CX001076
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GAST-001-18S
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.