Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-01
2021-01-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
mFOLFOX/mFOLFIRI vs. mFOLFOX in Advanced or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancer Second-line
NCT07062536
Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
NCT01494363
Salvage mFOLFOX in BTC After Failure of Gemcitabine
NCT01127555
mFOLFOX vs. mFOLFIRI in Advanced or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancer Refractory to First Line
NCT03464968
FOLFIRI as Salvage Treatment in Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC) Patients Who Were Failed After Gemcitabine Containing Chemotherapy: A Phase II Single Arm Prospective Study
NCT03110510
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
\<Metastatic or relapsed biliary tract cancer treatment\> Chemotherapy is the main treatment in BTC, which is relapsed or metastatic status. 5- Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based treatment has been shown to improve the survival period for pancreatic and bile cancer patients compared to the optimal supportive care (5-FU/leucovorin ± etoposide 6.0 vs. 2.5 months, p \<0.01). Also, chemotherapy helped maintain the quality of life. The improvement in quality of life over a period of at least four months showed a significant difference compared to 10% in the group that received only optimal supportive care for 36% of the chemotherapy group. (p \< 0.01). Currently used as the standard primary treatment in metastatic or locally advanced BTC is gemcitabine/platinum combination chemotherapy. In a large phase III study, Gemcitabine/cisplatin significantly improved the median value of the progressive free survival (PFS) period from 5.0 months to 8.0 months, and the overall survival (OS) period from 8.1 months to 11.7 months, compared to the gemcitabine alone. If Cisplatin is not available, oxaliplatin can be considered as a merger with gemcitabine. The Gemcitabine/oxaliplatin regimen reported in the phase II and phase III studies PFS was 4.2-5.5 months, median for the OS period was 9.5-12.4 months.
\<Salvage treatment of biliary tract cancer\> To date, there is no standard secondary chemotherapy recognized after the failure of the gemcitabine/platinum primary treatment. Since BTC usually occurs at an advanced age and shows a low frequency of occurrence in the West, there are practical limitations to conducting large-scale clinical research. So far, there is no large three-phase study proving the benefits of secondary chemotherapy after the failure of gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy. Implementation of secondary chemotherapy in actual clinicians is known to vary from country to country, depending on the medical judgment of the responsible clinician. In a large-scale retrospective study by the Association des Gastro-Enterologies Oncology (AGEO) group in France, 32.5% of the patients were treated with second line therapy, and 75% of the patients were reported in Japan. A retrospective study and a two-phase study and systematic literature review suggest that there will be a benefit from the treatment if second line treatment is selected for patients whose general health is relatively well maintained. Results of single or combination therapy using drugs such as Irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-FU, S-1, and capecitabine were reported in phase II and retrospective studies, yielding an average of 3.2 months of PFS, 7.7% of mean response rate, and 7.2 months of OS.
The 5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) therapy, along with the capecitabine/irinotecan therapy, is reported as the most commonly used secondary chemotherapy in the AGEO group in France. A treatment strategy for continuous use of FOLFIRI as a secondary treatment after the failure of Gemcitabine/oxaliplatin showed the median value for OS period of 21.9 months, and the median value for the PFS period. The PFS and OS due to the FOLFIRI was found to be 3.2 months and 8.4 months, respectively. On the other hand, the FOLFOX therapy, which combines oxaliplatin with 5-FU, showed a response rate of 21.6 % when administered as a secondary treatment after the failure of gemcitabine/cisplatin, and a median PFS of 3.1 months. A phase III study is currently underway that compares the administration of FOLFOX as a secondary treatment with the optimum support. In Korea, there is a problem with the standard reimbursement for applying to drugs prescribed to cancer patients, and in particular, cancer drugs that can be used as secondary therapy in metastatic BTC patients are limited. There is a need to improve the prognosis of BTC patients by expanding the use of various drugs that have been proven through external clinical research.
\<5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX) regimen for other cancer of BTC\> In a pre-clinical experiment, oxaliplatin and irinotecan have synergistic effects and are known to have relatively no overlap of toxic effects among, 5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. The combination treatment of 5-FU/leukovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) had a high therapeutic effect on progressive pancreatic cancer and colon cancer. In a phase III study comparing FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine as a first line treatment in metastatic pancreatic cancer, the objective response rate (32 vs. 9%), PFS (6.4 vs. 3.3 months) and OS (11.1 vs. 6.8 months) were significantly higher in FOLFIRINOX. On the other hand, treatment-related toxicities, with a grade 3/4 of neutropenia (46 vs. 21%), febrile neutropenia (5.4 vs. 1.2%), thrombocytopenia (9.1 vs. 3.6%), sensory neuropathy (9 vs. 0%), vomiting (23 vs. 18%), and diarrhea (113 vs. 2%) were more common in FOLFIRINOX. In a phase III study comparing the 5-FU/leukovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin(FORFOXRI) and the 5-FU/leukovorin/irinotecan(FORFIRI) as a first line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer, the FORFOXRI group was objective response (66 vs. 41 %), the PFS (9.8 vs. 6.9 months) and the OS (2.6 vs. 16.7 months) showed significant improvements. In pancreatic cancer, FOLFIRINOX was a treatment that was limited in patients with good general condition due to its high level of toxicity, including neutropenia, but the dose-reduction proved to be applied not only as a primary treatment but also as a secondary treatment. In a phase II study of pancreatic cancer patients in China, there was a 29% of grade 3/4 neutropenia were reported due to the treatment of modified FOLFIRINOX using oxaliplatin 68 mg/m2, irinotecan 135 mg/m2, and 5-FU injection of 2,400 mg/m2 for 46 hours, and there was no increase in mortality and febrile neutropenia. Other major grade 3 or higher toxicity levels showed improved safety profiles with thrombocytopenia (4.8%), anemia (8.1%), infection (4.8%), and elevated liver enzyme (14.5%).
\<Rationale of this trial\>
As a 2nd line treatment for metastatic BTC the assessment of modified FOLFIRINOX is supported by:
* The prognosis for metastatic BTC, which fails first line therapy, is poor and has no standardized treatment. Therefore, better treatment modalities are required to improve the survival of patients who no longer respond to first line treatment and to maintain the quality of life.
* Treatments that use irinotecan or oxaliplatin as secondary therapy for metastatic BTC have been shown in retrospective and phase II studies and are actually used in clinical practice of other countries.
* Oxaliplatin and irinotecan have synergistic effects and the FOLFIRINOX therapy, which uses both drugs together in 5-FU/leucovorin, has been shown to increase efficacy in pancreatic and colon cancer.
* The modified FOLFIRINOX, which was used with reduced dosage, indicates an acceptable toxic profile while maintaining its efficacy
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
mFOLFIRINOX
D1 Oxaliplatin 65 mg/m2 + 5% dextrose water (5DW) 200 mL mix IV over 2 hours followed by, D1 Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 + 5DW 200 ml mix IV over 2 hours D1 Irinotecan 135 mg/m2 + 5DW 500 mL mix IV over 2 hours (concurrent with the leucovorin infusion) D1-2 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 + 5DW 1 liter (1L) continuous IV over 23 hours repeat every 2 weeks
5-Fluorouracil
D1-2 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 + 5DW 1L continuous IV over 23 hours q 2 weeks
Leucovorin
D1 Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 + 5DW 200 ml mix IV over 2 hours q 2 weeks
Irinotecan
D1 Irinotecan 135 mg/m2 + 5DW 500 mL mix IV over 2 hours (concurrent with the leucovorin infusion) q 2weeks
Oxaliplatin
D1 Oxaliplatin 65 mg/m2 + 5DW 200 mL mix IV over 2 hours q 2 weeks
5% dextrose water
mix fluid with 5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
5-Fluorouracil
D1-2 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 + 5DW 1L continuous IV over 23 hours q 2 weeks
Leucovorin
D1 Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 + 5DW 200 ml mix IV over 2 hours q 2 weeks
Irinotecan
D1 Irinotecan 135 mg/m2 + 5DW 500 mL mix IV over 2 hours (concurrent with the leucovorin infusion) q 2weeks
Oxaliplatin
D1 Oxaliplatin 65 mg/m2 + 5DW 200 mL mix IV over 2 hours q 2 weeks
5% dextrose water
mix fluid with 5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. In the event that the progression of the gemcitabine/cisplatin is experienced during or after discontinuation of the first line treatment for metastatic, locally advanced or relapsed (it may be considered as a first line treatment that recurrence within six months of completion of the adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine/cisplatin)
3. Patient (or legal representative) has completed an approved consent documents that he or she will participate in the test after receiving sufficient information about the clinical trial
4. East clinical oncology group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
5. One or more measurable lesions by RECIST v1.1.
6. Appropriate organ functions; A. Liver: bilirubin ≤ 3 mg/dL, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 x ULN (in cases of liver metastasis, AST or ALT ≤ 5 x ULN) B. Kidney: An estimate of creatine clearance rate according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (or local institution's standard method) \> 30 mili-liter (mL)/min C. Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL (transfusion allowed), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1500/μL, platelet count ≥ 75,000/μL.
7. Expected life time over 3 months.
8. Over 19 years old.
9. In case of proper bile excretion function
10. Have the will and ability to comply with the clinical trial plan during the study period, including treatment and scheduled visits and examination.
11. For pre-menopausal women and for women less than one year after the onset of menopause, serum or urine pregnancy tests shall be confirmed negative during screening.
12. For men and fertile women, the use of effective contraceptive methods should be agreed (effective contraception should be used for at least 30 days prior to the initial administration of a investigational drug, the trial period, and at least 90 days after the discontinuation of the test participation).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Symptomatic or untreated brain metastasis or spinal cord compression metastasis.
3. Previous treatment using Irinotecan or oxaliplatin
4. In case of major surgery within four weeks just before registration, excluding biopsy for diagnosis
5. In case of chemotherapy or radiation therapy was received within three weeks prior to the administration of a test medication
6. Grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy
7. Grade 2 or higher toxicities caused by a previous cancer treatment based on NCI-CTCAE v 4.03 other than hair loss
8. A person diagnosed with another malignant tumor within the last five years. Exceptions include basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or intraepithelial neoplasia (bladder, uterine cervical, colorectal, breast)
9. Pregnant or nursing woman
10. If there is a severe or uncontrolled systemic disease, active infection, active bleeding tendency or organ transplantation history (including allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation)
11. The following virus infection A. Known positive history for human immunodeficiency virus (Human Immunodeficiency virus, HIV) test or known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) B. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (positive Hepatitis B surface -Ag (+) or HCV RNA (+) if anti-HCV Ab screening test is positive)
12. If there is a known alcohol or drug abuse
13. In cases of clinically significant (i.e., active) cardiovascular disease: cerebral hemorrhage/brain infarction, myocardial infarction (pre-registration \< 6 months), unstable angina, congestive heart failure (NYHA classification ≥2) or arrhythmia needed drug therapy.
14. In case of a mental state in which it is impossible to understand and provide the consent.
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dong-A University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sung Yong Oh
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sung Yong Oh, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dong-A University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dong-A University Hospital
Busan, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GF BTC-2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.