A Feasibility Study of Early Mobilisation Programmes in Critical Care
NCT ID: NCT03771014
Last Updated: 2022-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-28
2022-09-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Occupational Therapy in Intensive Care: Feasibility of Implementation
NCT04186611
Feasibility and Safety of Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation in Intensive Care Unit Patients
NCT06653998
On-Track Feasibility Study of a Rehabilitation System for Stroke Patients
NCT03944486
Outpatient Based Physical Rehabilitation for Survivors of Prolonged Critical Illness
NCT02491021
Robotic Assisted Early Mobilization in Ventilated ICU Patients
NCT04423796
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Muscle wasting occurs early (within 12 hours) and progresses rapidly after ICU admission. Patients may suffer from consequent physical impairment for months or years following their discharge.
ICU based rehabilitation has the potential to improve physical function outcomes, through mitigating muscle wasting.
The investigators have successfully introduced a very early ICU mobility program in their institution, which results in increased ventilator free days and reduced length of ICU stay.
The primary aim is to investigate whether this method will work in other ICUs. EMPRESS will test the feasibility of running this intervention as an RCT. The results and a concurrent process evaluation will inform the design of a future, multi-centre randomised controlled trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early mobility
Patients will receive standard physiotherapy regimen plus 2 x 30 minute rehabilitation sessions 5 days per week.
Early mobility
This progressive mobility pathway commenced with passive cycling within 48 hours of intubation and ventilation and progressing through assisted cycling, active cycling, bed exercises, sitting, mobilising out of bed to walking
Standard care
Patients will receive standard physiotherapy regimen
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early mobility
This progressive mobility pathway commenced with passive cycling within 48 hours of intubation and ventilation and progressing through assisted cycling, active cycling, bed exercises, sitting, mobilising out of bed to walking
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \> 42 years old.
* Functionally independent prior to ICU admission (Barthel \>80).
* In hospital for \<5 days prior to intubation and ventilation.
* Intubated and ventilated for \<72 hrs.
* Expected to remain ventilated for a further 48 hours.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with acute brain or spinal cord injury.
* Known or suspected neurological / muscular impairment.
* Condition limiting use of cycle ergometer e.g. lower limb fracture / amputation.
* Not expected to survive \>48hrs.
* Persistent therapy exemptions in first 3 days of mechanical ventilation.
* Body habitus such as unable to use cycle ergometer.
* Consultant clinician view that patient not suitable or not expected to survive admission.
42 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca Cusack, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cusack R, Bates A, Mitchell K, van Willigen Z, Denehy L, Hart N, Dushianthan A, Reading I, Chorozoglou M, Sturmey G, Davey I, Grocott M. Improving physical function of patients following intensive care unit admission (EMPRESS): protocol of a randomised controlled feasibility trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e055285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055285.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UHSEmpress
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.