Correct Endotracheal Tube Position in Newborns Intubated in the Delivery Room

NCT ID: NCT03770104

Last Updated: 2021-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

280 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators wished to determine whether estimating endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion depth using the formula given by Spanish guidelines recommendations (5,5 plus weight) rather than the depth using the formula given by international guidelines recommendations (6 plus weight) resulted in more correctly positioned endotracheal tube tips in newborns intubated in the delivery room.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A number of different methods have been used to guide clinicians in estimating the correct depth of insertion of endotracheal tube (ETT) at the time of oral intubation. Minor differences in tube length may lead to intubation of the right main bronchus or extubation. However, none of them has shown to be better than others when compared in the context of randomized clinical trials.

Commonly, clinicians use a formula based on the newborn's weight (Tochen formula: ETT insertion depth (cm)=6 + wt (kg)). While this method is widely used and recommended by international guidelines, it has been found to frequently result in incorrectly positioned tubes, especially in infants \<1000 g in weight in whom it may lead to overestimation of ETT insertion depth.

On the other hand, Spanish Society of Neonatology recommended in their last published guidelines (2017) to use an alternative version formula (ETT insertion depth (cm)=5.5 + wt (kg)), which is commonly used among Spanish neonatal units.

Finally, no studies have been performed in newborns who require oral intubation in the delivery room, since these intubations are usually excluded because infants are not routinely weighed prior to resuscitation and weight can not be rapidly obtained. Given that Obstetric Unit in our hospital is a high standard one with a highly reliable estimated fetal weight in prenatal ultrasound, the investigators will use estimated fetal weight referred on ultrasounds or 50th percentile for gestational age for calculations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation Complication Newborn Morbidity Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Clinicians and neonatal nurses will not masked to group assignment. However, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit nurses who take care of the patient will be mask, as well as both pediatric radiologist who will determine the main outcome of the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group (5.5 plus weight)

ETT insertion depth using Spanish recommendations Patients included in the intervention group arm who are included in the study will be intubated using Spanish recommendations (5.5 plus weight) to estimate insertion endotracheal tube depth. In addition, every arm will be divided into 2 subgroups depending on gestational age (under 32 weeks or equal/over 32 weeks' gestation).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ETT insertion depth using Spanish recommendations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Infants included in this assignment group will be intubated using the formula 5.5 plus weight, when requiring oral intubation in the delivery room.

Control Group (6 plus weight)

ETT insertion depth using international recommendations Patients included in the intervention group arm who are included in the study will be intubated using international recommendations (6 plus weight) to estimate insertion endotracheal tube depth. In addition, every arm will be divided into 2 subgroups depending on gestational age (under 32 weeks or equal/over 32 weeks' gestation).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ETT insertion depth using international recommendations

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Infants included in this assignment group will be intubated using the formula 6 plus weight, when requiring oral intubation in the delivery room.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ETT insertion depth using Spanish recommendations

Infants included in this assignment group will be intubated using the formula 5.5 plus weight, when requiring oral intubation in the delivery room.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ETT insertion depth using international recommendations

Infants included in this assignment group will be intubated using the formula 6 plus weight, when requiring oral intubation in the delivery room.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All newborns requiring endotracheal oral intubation in the delivery room after birth.
* Parents accept deferred informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior to randomization
* Uncontrolled gestation where both estimated fetal weight and gestational age are unknown.
* Upper airway anomaly or a lung anomaly that would distort the upper airway anatomy.
* Infants who require nasotracheal intubation
* Infants who are intubated in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
* Post-randomization
* Newborns who are randomized but finally do not require intubation
* Intubated newborns who are electively extubated in the delivery room
* Parents / legal guardian refuse to give consent to participate in the study
Maximum Eligible Age

1 Day

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tania Carbayo Jiménez

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tania Carbayo Jiménez

Tania Carbayo Jimenez, MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tania Carbayo Jimenez, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Neonatology Department.

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tania Carbayo Jimenez, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

0034 91 390 8272

Carmen Rosa Pallás Alonso, M.D.; Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

0034 913908273

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

María Soriano-Ramos, M.D.

Role: primary

0034 91390 8272

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Flinn AM, Travers CP, Laffan EE, O'Donnell CP. Estimating the endotracheal tube insertion depth in newborns using weight or gestation: a randomised trial. Neonatology. 2015;107(3):167-72. doi: 10.1159/000369375.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25592171 (View on PubMed)

Gill I, Stafford A, Murphy MC, Geoghegan AR, Crealey M, Laffan E, O'Donnell CPF. Randomised trial of estimating oral endotracheal tube insertion depth in newborns using weight or vocal cord guide. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F312-F316. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312798. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28883098 (View on PubMed)

Tochen ML. Orotracheal intubation in the newborn infant: a method for determining depth of tube insertion. J Pediatr. 1979 Dec;95(6):1050-1. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80309-1. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 501484 (View on PubMed)

Amarilyo G, Mimouni FB, Oren A, Tsyrkin S, Mandel D. Orotracheal tube insertion in extremely low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2009 May;154(5):764-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.11.057.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19364561 (View on PubMed)

Peterson J, Johnson N, Deakins K, Wilson-Costello D, Jelovsek JE, Chatburn R. Accuracy of the 7-8-9 Rule for endotracheal tube placement in the neonate. J Perinatol. 2006 Jun;26(6):333-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211503.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16642028 (View on PubMed)

Kempley ST, Moreiras JW, Petrone FL. Endotracheal tube length for neonatal intubation. Resuscitation. 2008 Jun;77(3):369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18372092 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Neo TEDI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Prone Positioning During Delayed Cord Clamping
NCT05507424 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA