Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-01
2026-06-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Synergetic B-cell Immodulation in SLE
NCT02284984
Evaluation of Belimumab Impact on a BLyS Activity Signature Test in the Absence of Confounding Polypharmacy
NCT02270970
Belimumab in SLE Synovial Inflammation and Lymph Nodes
NCT06327724
A Study to Evaluate the Safety of Rituximab Retreatment in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT00137969
Anti-CD20 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT00036491
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The SynBioSe-1 study is the first study to comprehensively describe the clinical and immunological effects of combining rituximab (RTX) and belimumab (BLM) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). From the pioneering SynBioSe-1 study, we have learned that combining RTX+BLM was safe and well-tolerated with important clinical responses. Immunologically, we unexpectedly observed that long-term B-cell depletion was not achieved due to migration of mature B-cells triggered by depletion of BAFF serum levels. The latter observation was in contrast to the study's null-hypothesis that combination therapy would lead to long-term B-cell depletion. The contrary was demonstrated, namely the relative early recirculation of mature B-cells. As such, the immunological and clinical lessons from the SynBioSe-1 study in conjunction with accumulating data from several large studies on combination B-cell targeted treatment have led to the postulation that starting treatment with RTX+BLM would result in an improved B-cell targeting strategy, notably on tissue-resident autoreactive B-cells, associated with improved long-term clinical disease amelioration. Therefore, the present SynBioSe-2 study is designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab followed by rituximab.
Objectives:
The primary objective is to assess whether combination treatment BLM+RTX will lead to reduced treatment failure and the improvement of pivotal, SLE-specific autoimmune phenomena compared to SLE patients treated with standard of care.
Study design:
a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study
Study population:
SLE patients with a severe flare with major organ involvement or persistent high disease activity despite conventional treatment
Intervention:
In addition to standard therapy, SLE patients will receive self-administered, subcutaneous injections of belimumab every week for the entire study period and 2 infusions of rituximab 1000 mg on day 28 (week 4) and day 42 (week 6).
Main study parameters:
The primary clinical efficacy parameter is the treatment failure rate during the 2 years study period. Secondary endpoints are clinical and non-biased immunological effects of the treatment summarized as follows: reduction of disease relevant autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibody production at 28 weeks, total renal response rate at 28 weeks, regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation at 28 weeks; sustained, long-term B-cell depletion during 104 weeks; sustained reduction of relevant anti-nuclear autoantibodies, including seroconversion during 104 weeks; and sustained regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation during 104 weeks. Additionally, the study will perform safety and toxicity monitoring according to Common toxicity Criteria (CTC) developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with the use of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and evaluate the reduction of concomitant immunosuppression and the number of moderate and severe flares during study follow-up.
Study duration: 104 weeks.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation and potential benefits:
The study will include SLE patients with a severe flare necessitating remission induction treatment with intensive immunosuppression. The use of belimumab followed by rituximab can ameliorate disease activity even more than conventional treatment in the short-term and contribute to the successful tapering of concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. The latter will possibly lead to the reduction of infectious complication as compared to conventional treatment. The risks are predominantly related to the side effect profile of rituximab and belimumab and infectious complications of long-term B-cell depletion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BLM+RTX treatment arm
Intervention 1 Belimumab injection: subcutaneous weekly injections with 200mg belimumab (BML) for the duration of the entire study period of two years.
Intervention 2 Rituximab infusion: Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab (RTX) at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab.
Intervention 3: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg\*hour/L.
Belimumab Injection
Weekly injection of belimumab prior to two infusions of rituximab with continuation of the belimumab as maintenance therapy
Standard of Care treatment arm
Intervention 1: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg\*hour/L.
Optional intervention: (if patients flare or are non-responders on mycofenolate mofetil + prednisolone) : Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Belimumab Injection
Weekly injection of belimumab prior to two infusions of rituximab with continuation of the belimumab as maintenance therapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Severe, active SLE disease defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
1. SLEDAI-2K (SLE Disease Activity Index) with 12 or more points
2. New or worse SLE-related activity of major organs, i.e.: CNS-SLE (includes NPSLE), vasculitis, nephritis, pericarditis and/or myocarditis, myositis, thrombocytopenia \< 60, hemolytic anemia \< 4.4mmol/L (=7.0g/dL)
3. high disease activity that requires or warrants induction treatment by switching to or increasing dosage of oral mycophenolate
3. New, persisting or progressive disease activity despite the use of conventional maintenance immunosuppressive treatment (e.g. mycophenolate or azathioprine)
4. Positive for relevant SLE-specific autoantibodies defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
1. ANA seropositivity, as defined by a positive ANA-titer ≥ 1:80, before and at screening :
* Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period; OR
* One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of ANA (eg, ANA by HEp-2 titer, ANA by ELISA) must include the date of the test.
2. Anti-DNA seropositivity, as defined by a positive anti-dsDNA serum antibody ≥ 30 IU/mL, before and at screening:
* Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period.
* One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of anti-dsDNA (eg, anti-dsDNA by Farr assay or ELISA) must include the date of the test.
5. Female subjects are eligible to enter the study if she is:
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Of non-child-bearing potential (i.e. after hysterectomy, postmenopausal, bilateral ovariectomy or documented bilateral tubal ligation or other permanent female sterilization procedure)
* in agreement to not become pregnant (if female subjects of childbearing potential) and therefore must be sexually inactive by abstinence or use contraceptive methods with a failure rate of \< 1%.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Significant hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG \< 4.0 g/L) or an IgA deficiency (IgA \< 0.1 g/L)
3. Immunization with a live vaccine 1 month before screening
4. Active infection at time of screening, as follows:
* Hospitalization for treatment of infection within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study
* Use of parenteral (intravenous of intramuscular) antibiotics (including anti-bacterials, anti-virals, anti-fungals or anti-parasitic agents) within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study
* Serological evidence of viral hepatitis defined as: patients positive for HbsAg test or HBcAb or a positive hepatitis C antibody not treated with antiviral medication
5. Have a historically positive HIV test or test positive at screening for HIV
6. Have a history of a primary immunodeficiency
7. Have a neutrophil count of \< 1.5x10E9/L
8. Have a significant infection history that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study
9. Have a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins or monoclonal antibodies
10. Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value in the opinion of the investigator
11. Have current drugs or alcohol abuse or dependence within 365 days prior to Day 0 of the study
12. Have an active malignant neoplasm or one in the history of the last 5 years, except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin treated with local resection only or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated locally and with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 years
13. Have evidence of serious suicide risk including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation in the last 2 months or who, in the investigator's opinion, poses a significant suicide risk
14. Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value, any intercurrent significant medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dutch Kidney Foundation
OTHER
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Y.K.Onno Teng
Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, Nephrologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Leiden University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, , Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
HagaZiekenhuis
The Hague, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arends EJ, Zlei M, Tipton CM, Cotic J, Osmani Z, de Bie FJ, Kamerling SWA, van Maurik A, Dimelow R, Gregan YI, Fox NL, Rabelink TJ, Roth DA, Sanz I, van Dongen JJM, van Kooten C, Teng YKO. Disruption of memory B-cell trafficking by belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae286.
van Schaik M, Arends EJ, Soonawala D, van Ommen E, de Leeuw K, Limper M, van Paassen P, Huizinga TWJ, Toes REM, van Kooten C, Rotmans JI, Rabelink TJ, Teng YKO. Efficacy of belimumab combined with rituximab in severe systemic lupus erythematosus: study protocol for the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label Synbiose 2 trial. Trials. 2022 Nov 12;23(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06874-w.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL65720.058.18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.