Cardiac Rehabilitation: From Hospital to Municipal Setting.
NCT ID: NCT03734185
Last Updated: 2025-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
514 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-01
2022-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rehabilitative Care to Patients With Heart Failure
NCT01239667
Shared Care Rehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT01522001
The Heart Priority Programme for Cardiac Patients at Risk of Dropout From Cardiac Rehabilitation
NCT06575764
Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation for People Living With Heart Failure and Their Caregivers- The DK:REACH-HF Pilot Study
NCT06573242
The Effect of Rehabilitation for Patients Living With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
NCT00569478
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
CR programmes do not meet the required evidence-based standard Several countries have developed clinical practice guidelines for CR, including Denmark in 2013. The guidelines incorporate the best available evidence for the management of CR to assist health professionals and patient decisions about appropriate rehabilitation. However, it is unclear to what extent local healthcare services CR is performed in accordance with the clinical practice guidelines for CR. Doherty P et al. studied the extent to which programmes meet national minimum standards for the delivery of CR as prescribed by the National Certification Programme for CR in UK. The authors found that 31% out of 170 unique CR programmes were delivered with high performance, 46% as mid-level performance, 18% were lower-level, while 5% failed to meet any of the minimum criteria. We have not been able to find other similar studies for performance of CR programmes in Denmark or elsewhere. Therefore, it is unclear whether the performance varies in local healthcare services CR programmes in Denmark, and whether there is a need for improvement to provide all patients a high-quality evidence-based service.
Patient education using learning and coping improves adherence Patient education is recommended in the clinical practice guidelines for CR and is defined as: "The process by which health professionals and others impact information to patients who will change their health behaviors or improve their health status". In the guidelines several educational topics are listed as important for patient education. However, the rationale for the specific areas is not completely explained in the guidelines. Furthermore, the guidelines only advice on what to teach, not how it should be done e.g. educational models, material, provider and setting. A systematic review shows that the delivery of patient education programmes can vary substantially, but common topics include nutrition, exercise, risk factor modification, psychosocial well-being and medications. Also duration, frequency and ongoing maintenance or re-inforcement vary between programmes. However, the Danish Health Authority recommend using evidence-based methods in patient education including Learning and Coping, Motivational interview.
In Central Denmark Region, six out of 19 local healthcare services have decided to use Learning and Coping in CR while remaining local healthcare services use different approaches. Learning and Coping is a health pedagogical strategy that builds on inductive teaching with high involvement of the participants. Characteristics of Learning and Coping are that 'experienced patients' plan, teach and evaluate, in cooperation with health professionals. In a hospital setting, Learning and Coping has shown an increase inpatient adherence in CR including training and patient education, especially for those with low socioeconomic status. However, it is unclear whether using Learning and Coping in local healthcare services performs similar results. These results are needed because low socioeconomic status is a common barrier to attending CR programmes.
Patient education using Learning and Coping to overcome barriers to CR System-, physical- and personal-level barriers in CR are well-described in the literature. Studies show that 13% to 20% of eligible patients are not referred to CR, and 19% to 45% do not attend CR. Also, long wait time to CR after referral entail low attendance. Health-related factors such as anxiety, depression, pain, or other illnesses are reported curtail the uptake. Like exercise-limiting comorbidities predict fewer sessions. Older adults, women, people who belong to ethnic minority groups, are young, have low socioeconomic status, live alone and receive limited social support are low attenders. Other studies show that family obligations and the distance from home to the programme setting entail low attendance. Few studies found that self-payment is a barrier to attend CR. This may not be an issue in Denmark as the Danish healthcare system provides tax-funded healthcare to the country's 5.7 million residents, including free access to hospital care, general practitioners and primary healthcare services including CR. Patients should be encouraged to attend patient education as literature reviews show that educational interventions with cardiac care increase patients' knowledge and facilitate behavior change. Furthermore, education interventions increase physical activity and lead to healthier dietary habits, smoking cessation and a higher quality of life.
It is unique that Central Denmark Region has assigned phase II CR as a local healthcare services. Thus, it is crucial to know more about performance in local healthcare services CR and whether all patients receive high-quality evidence-based services regardless of where they live. To our knowledge, no studies have examined the association between performance in different health pedagogical strategies and outcomes. This association is important to investigate when dramatic organisational changes in settings of evidence based interventions is implemented, as well as in relation to helping people with heart disease return to an active and satisfying everyday life. This study is unique and may inform and affect the way CR is organised and performed on a national and an international level to improve quality of care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
References
1. Smid DE, et al. Responsiveness and MCID Estimates for CAT... J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017 Jan;18(1):53-58.
2. Oldridge N, et al. The HeartQoL: Part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire... Eur J Prev Cardiolog 2014 01/01; 2017/09;21(1):98-106.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Learning and Coping
A health pedagogical strategy that builds on inductive teaching with high involvement of the participants. Characteristics of Learning and Coping are that 'experienced patients' plan, teach and evaluate, in cooperation with health professionals.
Learning and Coping
'Experienced patients' plan, teach and evaluate, in cooperation with health professionals.
Usual Cardiac Rehabilitation
The theoretical frameworks used in some of these local healthcare services are empowerment, self-efficacy and self-management
Learning and Coping
'Experienced patients' plan, teach and evaluate, in cooperation with health professionals.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Learning and Coping
'Experienced patients' plan, teach and evaluate, in cooperation with health professionals.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Defactum, Central Denmark Region
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charlotte Gjørup Pedersen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Defactum, Central Denmark Region
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charlotte Gjørup Pedersen
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cardiac Rehab
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.