Measurement Training and Feedback System: Family Therapy and CBT
NCT ID: NCT03722654
Last Updated: 2023-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-01
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If promising, future R01 studies will examine links among intervention, targets, and ultimate outcomes (AEPs). The MTFS-I package will be an online quality assurance system completed by therapists and supervisors that can be readily sustained in usual care. Two weekly Training components will adapt gold-standard observational fidelity coding procedures to promote improved self-monitoring of the targeted EBIs, and a monthly Feedback component will adapt a measurement feedback system to promote increased utilization of these EBIs in everyday practice. To maximize provider investment, sites will delineate their own fidelity standards for family therapy and CBT and help design feedback report templates.
The proposed study will be among the first to (1) test whether training therapists in observational assessment of EBI fidelity increases the accuracy with which they self-monitor use of those EBIs and (2) adapt measurement feedback procedures to track and improve therapist utilization of EBIs. To achieve study aims the investigators will first partner with two community clinics to develop sustainable MTFS-I procedures using a three-phase Pilot process. Investigators will then initiate an experimental Trial during which therapists (n = 32, treating 192 clients) at four different clinics will be randomized to MTFS-I versus no-intervention Control. In both conditions two kinds of data will be collected: therapist-report checklists on use of core family therapy and CBT techniques with adolescent cases and treatment session audio recordings. MTFS-I uptake will be tracked electronically for online components (Aim 1: MTFS feasibility). Session recordings will be coded by observers for three facets of EBI fidelity: adherence (extent of EBI utilization), working alliance, and therapist competence. Observer ratings will measure the strength of EBI self-monitoring (Aim 2: therapist reliability and accuracy) and fidelity (Aim 3 \[EBI utilization\] \& Aim 4 \[alliance, competence\]). If effective, MTFS-I could be adapted to promote EBI fidelity for a variety of clinical populations and approaches.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Designing and Testing a Family Therapy for Adolescent Depression
NCT00867919
Family Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Preventing Depression in Children
NCT00183482
Family and Peer Involvement in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children
NCT00073645
Maine Implementation Study - Phase III
NCT02229305
Examine the Preliminary Effect of an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Consultation Model on Staff Fidelity to EBP
NCT03722745
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two behavioral treatment approaches are prime candidates for upgrading the quality of AEP treatment services. Both family therapy (FT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have excellent efficacy evidence for AEPs in both research and community settings. Each has strong support for treating serious conduct problems, delinquency, and substance use, and each has several manualized versions proven efficacious across the AEP range. Due to this extensive evidence base, there is incentive from clinical providers and payers to deliver these approaches in routine care: Both are now approved for treating AEPs by federal and private insurance plans and by regulatory agencies that govern licensed treatment providers. Notably, therapists report that both approaches are highly valued in everyday practice.
By consensus, the most efficient pathway toward improving the quality of mental health services is to increase the adoption and delivery of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in usual care. However, there is a caveat: For EBIs to be effective in frontline settings, they must be delivered with sufficient fidelity to the principles and procedures of the approaches they represent. This remains a most difficult challenge for which innovative solutions are sorely needed. With regard to AEPs, controlled studies have shown that strong fidelity to the FT and CBT approaches predicts improved client outcomes in both efficacy and effectiveness studies. Yet, at this time, neither FT nor CBT are widely implemented with fidelity in community clinics that treat AEPs. To promote EBI fidelity as a core virtue of the behavioral care system, the study team published a theoretical model in which EBI implementation is recognized as an essential driver of positive client outcomes. This model includes structural characteristics of care that directly influence both implementation and outcomes, as well as outcomes considered relevant within the "quality of care" framework. The middle section depicts elements of implementation that have proven salient for effective EBI delivery, including technical factors (adherence to core treatment techniques, therapist competence) and relational factors (e.g., alliance), given that both are related to outcomes. According to this model and similar others, EBI implementation fidelity is a multidimensional construct with three primary facets: Adherence (extent to which signature EBI techniques are utilized), Competence (skillfulness and responsiveness of EBI delivery), and Alliance (working relationship between provider and client). In AEP research, fidelity-outcome studies consistently find that stronger EBI adherence and stronger alliance predict better client outcomes. Evidence for competence-outcome effects is less consistent, in large part because competence remains difficult to operationalize reliably. According to this framework, innovations aimed at improving service quality should directly target EBI fidelity; stronger EBI fidelity will then boost client outcome.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MTFS
MTFS-I Installation
MTFS-I Installation
MTFS-I Installation will focus on introducing MTFS-I components including weekly training modules and mock video segments to be coded, as well as monthly feedback reports summarizing therapist self-reported FT and CBT implementation in active cases. Facilitation will also be included to review progress and provide regular support.
Control
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MTFS-I Installation
MTFS-I Installation will focus on introducing MTFS-I components including weekly training modules and mock video segments to be coded, as well as monthly feedback reports summarizing therapist self-reported FT and CBT implementation in active cases. Facilitation will also be included to review progress and provide regular support.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aaron Hogue, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Center on Addiction
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Roberto Clemente Center
New York, New York, United States
The LGBT Community Center
New York, New York, United States
Montefiore
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hogue A, Bobek M, MacLean A, Porter N, Jensen-Doss A, Henderson CE. Measurement training and feedback system for implementation of evidence-based treatment for adolescent externalizing problems: protocol for a randomized trial of pragmatic clinician training. Trials. 2019 Dec 10;20(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3783-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.