Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-28
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Trial of Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy Surgery in Cervix Cancer
NCT04831580
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy Using Endoscopic Stapler in Stage IB2 or IIA1 Cervical Cancer
NCT07256977
Pilot Study for the Generation of Cervical Cancer Organoids From Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Biopsy
NCT07248878
Comparison of Class II and Class III Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer Cervical Cancer
NCT02368574
Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer
NCT03739944
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved robot-assisted surgery for gynaecological indications. Observational studies have confirmed advantages in form of shorter hospital stay, less bleeding and acceptable OT. Furthermore, compared to conventional laparoscopy OT is significantly shorter with robot technique. Despite wide acceptance and implementation of the robotic system into gynecological oncology todate there are mainly retrospective observational data published on oncological outcomes, offering a low evidence level.
The sentinel node biopsy concept (SNB) is well established in the surgical management of several malignancies including breast, melanoma and vulvar cancer. Theoretically, the implementation would change the management of patients with early cervical cancer dramatically by avoiding multimodal treatment.
Traditionally, radiotracers (Technetium) with or without augmentation of blue dye have been used for SNB. Novel tracers such as fluorescent dyes (indocyanine green (ICG)) have been demonstrated to be superior.
Apart from detection rate, the rate of bilateral mapping of sentinel nodes and sensitivity (false negative rate included), constitutes the most important aspect of the technique. In recent ESGO guidelines on the management of stage IA disease SNB is recommended as the standard treatment unless in patients with positive LVSI where complete PLND should be considered.
RATIONALE In 2018, the LACC (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer) trial was completed and the results demonstrated inferiority for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). In the trial, 631 women were randomized to MIS (85% by traditional laparoscopy and the remaining by robot-assisted surgery). Disease-free and overall survival were significantly worse by MIS with no observed advantage in quality of life or perioperative morbidity.
After the trial was closed, two large population-based studies from the Nordic countries (unpublished data) show no difference in either DFS or OS. The absolute majority in these studies were operated by robot-assisted surgery.
Robot-assisted surgery has replaced traditional laparoscopy for radical hysterectomy. Whether robot-assisted surgery is associated with better oncologic outcomes than traditional laparoscopy is unknown.The purpose of the RACC trial is to assess the safety of robot-assisted laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer.
RATIONALE FOR THE QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT Two randomised controlled trials (LAP2 and LACE) have demonstrated that MIS is superior to laparotomy i in terms of perioperative morbidity and quality of life. However, the LACC trial did not show any differences between MIS and laparotomy for these outcomes. Whether robot-assisted surgery offers superior outcomes is unknown. In the RACC trial, QoL will be assessed in both arms at 5 time points using the EORTC QLQ-CX24 form and the FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index).
RATIONALE FOR THE SENTINEL NODE ALGORITHM Tumor extension to pelvic lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor in early stage cervical cancer. Traditionally, nodal assessment has been performed through systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Sentinel node concepts have been evaluated in several smaller studies but none with sufficient power to properly assess the diagnostic accuracy.
PRIMARY ENDPOINT
\- Recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 60 months
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS
* Overall survival (OS) at 60 months
* Perioperative morbidity
* Quality of life
* Diagnostic accuracy of a sentinel node algorithm in cervical cancer
* Health care costs
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy
Total radical hysterectomy with Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by completion pelvic lymphadenectomy
Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy
Radical hysterectomy (type B or C according to the Querleu\&Morrow classification) with pelvic lymphadenectomy
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Assessment of sentinel lymph nodes using either radiotracer or indocyanine green (ICG)
Abdominal radical hysterectomy
Total radical hysterectomy with Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by completion pelvic lymphadenectomy
Abdominal radical hysterectomy
Radical hysterectomy (type B or C according to the Querleu\&Morrow classification) with pelvic lymphadenectomy
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Assessment of sentinel lymph nodes using either radiotracer or indocyanine green (ICG)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Abdominal radical hysterectomy
Radical hysterectomy (type B or C according to the Querleu\&Morrow classification) with pelvic lymphadenectomy
Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy
Radical hysterectomy (type B or C according to the Querleu\&Morrow classification) with pelvic lymphadenectomy
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Assessment of sentinel lymph nodes using either radiotracer or indocyanine green (ICG)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with histologically confirmed stage IB (IB3 excluded) and IIA1, according to the latest revision of the FIGO staging manual
* Patients undergoing either a Type B or C radical hysterectomy (Querleu and Morrow classification)
* Patients with adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function
* ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1 or 2.
* Patient must be suitable candidates for surgery.
* Patients who have signed an approved Informed Consent
* Age 18 years or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Tumor size greater than 4 cm
* FIGO stage II-IV (except IIA1)
* Patients with a history of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy
* Patients who are pregnant
* Patients with contraindications to surgery
* Patients with evidence of metastatic disease by conventional imaging, enlarged pelvic or aortic lymph nodes \> 2cm; or histologically positive lymph nodes
* Serious concomitant systemic disorders incompatible with the study (at the discretion of the investigator)
* Patients unable to withstand prolonged lithotomy and steep Trendelenburg position
* Patients with secondary invasive neoplasm in the last 5 years (except non-melanoma skin cancer, breast cancer T1N0M0 grade 1 or 2 without any signs of recurrence or activity)
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Henrik Falconer
Head of GYN Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henrik Falconer, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Falconer H, Palsdottir K, Stalberg K, Dahm-Kahler P, Ottander U, Lundin ES, Wijk L, Kimmig R, Jensen PT, Zahl Eriksson AG, Maenpaa J, Persson J, Salehi S. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jul;29(6):1072-1076. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000558. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Trial website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KS_RACC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.