Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Early Stages Cervical Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02494063
Last Updated: 2024-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-06-30
2024-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The null hypothesis is that the recurrence rate after SLN biopsy is non-inferior to the reference recurrence rate of 7 % (at the 24th month of follow-up) in patients after systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, but that the less radical surgery is associated with significantly lower postoperative morbidity.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sentinel Concept in Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT01157962
Comparison of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Isolated Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure for Early Stages of Cervical Cancers : a Multicenter Study With Evaluation of Medico-economic Impacts
NCT01639820
Sentinel Lymph Nodes Biopsy in Cervical Cancer
NCT06169787
Laparoscopic Sentinel Lymph Node Localization in Operable Cervix Cancer
NCT00205010
HPV in Sentinel Lymph Nodes of Cervical Cancer Patients
NCT03749707
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Surgery should be done within 6 weeks of the imaging study (MRI or expert US). During the surgery, local or distant cancer spread outside of the cervix will be excluded, SLN will be detected, and all SLN will be sent for intra-operative pathologic evaluation. In patients with SLN detection on both sides of the pelvis no other lymph nodes will be removed and they will continue in the study. SLN biopsy will be followed by radical hysterectomy (type B, C1, or C2) or fertility-sparing procedure, according to the pre-operative plan.
Intra-operatively, three groups of patient will be excluded from the SLN study group (though they can be included in the control group):
1. Patients with intra-operative detection of more advanced disease stage (\> IB1)
2. Patients with failure to detect SLN bilaterally (either no SLN detected or only on one side of the pelvis)
3. Patients with intra-operative pathologic detection of macrometastases or micrometastases in SLN
In these patients who were excluded from the study group, further surgery and adjuvant treatment will be provided according to the institutional guidelines. These patients will remain in a database and reasons for their exclusion from the SLN study group will be entered into the SIS (Form 2).
A control group will be established to compare postoperative morbidity in patients after SLN biopsy only and after complete pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients in whom complete lymphadenectomy was performed at least on one side of the pelvis will be eligible for the control group.
In patients, who continue in the study, all SLNs will be processed by pathologists according to the protocol for SLN ultrastaging (Chapter 7.4.2; Appendix 11). If macrometastases or micrometastases or isolated tumor cells are detected in any of the SLNs by pathologic ultrastaging after the surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy will be recommended to the patient. No adjuvant treatment will be offered to those with negative final lymph node status, confirmed pre-operative disease FIGO stage (IA1 - IB1), and adequately performed radical hysterectomy with negative parametrial and vaginal margins.
Follow-up will consist of visits at regular intervals of 6 months after the surgery (additional visits in shorter intervals can be scheduled according to institutional guidelines). The following procedures will be provided at each visit during the follow-up period: pelvic examination, symptomatic lymphocele assessment, quality of life assessment (6 and 12 months after the surgery), adverse events assessment, and secondary lower extremity lymphedema assessment (maximum 6 years after surgery in SLN group, 4 years in Control group). Other imaging studies will be done only if clinically indicated. Any postoperative complication or disease recurrence will be managed according to the institutional guidelines.
Outcomes after fertility sparing procedures in selected centres with be collected (i.e. morbidity after cervical procedure or ovarian transposition, treatment of infertility, pregnancy rates and complications).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sentinel lymph node (SLN)
Only sentinel lymph node biopsy, no further pelvic lymph nodes removal, radical hysterectomy.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Bilateral sentinel lymph node biopsy, pathologic ultrastaging
Control
Control group is composed by either those who were enrolled into the trial, but who did not fulfil intra-operative criteria (especially failure to detect SLN on both pelvic side walls) or those in whom systematic lymphadenectomy is planned upfront.
At least unilateral systematic pelvic lymph node dissection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Bilateral sentinel lymph node biopsy, pathologic ultrastaging
At least unilateral systematic pelvic lymph node dissection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. FIGO stage IA1+LVSI; IA2; IB1
2. No evidence of bulky or suspicious pelvic lymph nodes or distant metastases in preoperative conventional imaging studies
3. Performance status ECOG: 0 - 1
4. Age ≥ 18 years, ≤ 75 years
5. Squamous cell carcinoma OR Adenocarcinoma usual type (HPV related)
6. Suitable candidates for primary surgical treatment such as:
* radical hysterectomy in tumors ≤ 4 cm in the largest diameter OR
* fertility-sparing treatment in tumors ≤ 2 cm in the largest diameter
7. History of second primary cancer only if \> 5 years with no evidence of disease
8. Approved and signed Informed consent
B) Intra-operative
1. Bilateral SLN detection
2. Negative intra-operative pathologic SLN evaluation (frozen section)
3. No intra-operative evidence of more advanced disease (\>IB1)
A) Preoperative:
1. FIGO stage IA1 + LVSI; IA2; IB
2. Performance status ECOG: 0-1
3. Age ≥ 18 years, ≤ 75 years
4. Patient is not pregnant
5. No history of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy
6. Patient scheduled for surgical treatment including systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
7. Approved and signed Informed Consent
B) Intra-operative:
a) Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy performed at least on one side of the pelvis
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy
3. History of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy
4. HIV positivity / AIDS
5. Adenosquamous cancer or adenocarcinoma unusual type (non HPV related - such as: mucinous, clear cell, mesonephric)
II) Control Group:
1. Pregnancy
2. History of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charles University, Czech Republic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Cibula
MD, PhD, Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Cibula, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czechia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gynecologic Oncology Center in Prague
Prague, , Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zikan M, Fischerova D, Pinkavova I, Slama J, Weinberger V, Dusek L, Cibula D. A prospective study examining the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphoceles following lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
Cibula D, Oonk MH, Abu-Rustum NR. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of gynecologic cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;27(1):66-72. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000133.
Giammarile F, Bozkurt MF, Cibula D, Pahisa J, Oyen WJ, Paredes P, Olmos RV, Sicart SV. The EANM clinical and technical guidelines for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in gynaecological cancers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jul;41(7):1463-77. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2732-8. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, Slama J, Zikan M, Zaal A, Sevcik L, Kenter G, Querleu D, Jach R, Bats AS, Dyduch G, Graf P, Klat J, Meijer CJ, Mery E, Verheijen R, Zweemer RP. Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: Lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec;127(3):462-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.035. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, Zikan M, Zaal A, Sevcik L, Kenter GG, Querleu D, Jach R, Bats AS, Dyduch G, Graf P, Klat J, Lacheta J, Meijer CJ, Mery E, Verheijen R, Zweemer RP. Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.037. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Benedetti-Panici P, Kohler C, Raspagliesi F, Querleu D, Morrow CP. New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Aug;122(2):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 May 17.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR. Pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer--surgical anatomy and proposal for a new classification system. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jan;116(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Cibula D, Marnitz S, Jarkovsky J, Kocian R, Dundr P, Klat J, Zapardiel I, Arencibia O, Landoni F, Presl J, Raspagliesi F, Zikan M, van Lonkhuijzen LR, Torne A, Slama J, Minar L, Ostojich M, Pilka R, Petiz AF, Petzel A, Burgetova A, Fischerova D, Nemejcova K, Kohler C. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in females with early-stage cervical cancer: final outcome of the SENTIX prospective, single-arm, noninferiority, international trial. Nat Cancer. 2025 Sep;6(9):1585-1594. doi: 10.1038/s43018-025-01016-y. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
Borcinova M, Kohler C, Nemejcova K, Zapardiel I, Klat J, Fruhauf F, Kalist V, Szatkowski W, Wydra D, Kocian R, Laky R, Toth R, Misiek M, Redecha M, Martin I, Kridelka F, Burgetova A, Santiago Garcia FJ, Van Gorp T, Szewczyk G, Kipp B, Poka R, Coronado PJ, Cadron I, Luyckx M, Fischerova D, Fischbach R, Cibula D. Preoperative tumour size assessment in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: Final results of the SENTIX study. Gynecol Oncol. 2025 May;196:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.04.005. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
Cibula D, Kohler C, Jarkovsky J, Kocian R, Dundr P, Klat J, Zapardiel I, Landoni F, Fruhauf F, Fischbach R, Borcinova M, Fischerova D. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound examination in preoperative pelvic staging of early-stage cervical cancer: post-hoc analysis of SENTIX study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;65(4):495-502. doi: 10.1002/uog.29205. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Kocian R, Kohler C, Bajsova S, Jarkovsky J, Zapardiel I, Di Martino G, van Lonkhuijzen L, Sehnal B, Sanchez OA, Gil-Ibanez B, Martinelli F, Presl J, Minar L, Pilka R, Kascak P, Havelka P, Michal M, van Gorp T, Nemejcova K, Dundr P, Cibula D. Sentinel lymph node pathological ultrastaging: Final outcome of the Sentix prospective international study in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;188:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
Borcinova M, Ragosch V, Jarkovsky J, Bajsova S, Pilka R, Glickman A, Garrido-Mallach S, Raspagliesi F, Szatkowski W, Pakiz M, Snyman LC, Kocian R, Tamussino K, Kalist V, Michal M, Segovia MG, Poka R, Kipp B, Szewczyk G, Wydra D, Toth R, Vinnytska A, Fischerova D, Siegler K, Cibula D. Challenges in lower limb lymphoedema assessment based on limb volume change: Lessons learnt from the SENTIX prospective multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jan;164(1):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.089. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Cibula D, Kocian R, Plaikner A, Jarkovsky J, Klat J, Zapardiel I, Pilka R, Torne A, Sehnal B, Ostojich M, Petiz A, Sanchez OA, Presl J, Buda A, Raspagliesi F, Kascak P, van Lonkhuijzen L, Barahona M, Minar L, Blecharz P, Pakiz M, Wydra D, Snyman LC, Zalewski K, Zorrero C, Havelka P, Redecha M, Vinnytska A, Vergote I, Tingulstad S, Michal M, Kipp B, Slama J, Marnitz S, Bajsova S, Hernandez A, Fischerova D, Nemejcova K, Kohler C. Sentinel lymph node mapping and intraoperative assessment in a prospective, international, multicentre, observational trial of patients with cervical cancer: The SENTIX trial. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;137:69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.034. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
Cibula D, Dusek J, Jarkovsky J, Dundr P, Querleu D, van der Zee A, Kucukmetin A, Kocian R. A prospective multicenter trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer (SENTIX). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jan;29(1):212-215. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000010.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ENGOT-Cx 2
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CEEGOG CX-01
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Protocol v2.0 (1st amendment)
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Protocol v3.0 (2nd amendment)
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Protocol v3.1 (3rd amendment)
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
16-31643A
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
19-03-00023
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CEEGOG CX-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.