The Prevention Program for Alzheimer's Related Delirium (PREPARED) Trial

NCT ID: NCT03718156

Last Updated: 2022-07-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-23

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

By the year 2038, over a million Canadians are expected to have Alzheimer's disease, a type of dementia. Dementia increases the risk of nursing home placement among the elderly more than fivefold. Given the exceptionally vulnerable nature of this patient population, there is a pressing need to ensure that the clinical care they receive is evidence-based, tailored specifically for them, and meeting the high standards of quality that would be expected in any other health-care setting. Delirium is a sudden and severe change in brain function that can cause a person to appear confused or disoriented, have memory loss, and have difficulties maintaining focus. It is an urgent care issue facing elderly patients residing in nursing homes, or long-term care (LTC) facilities. Delirium is a significant cause of illness and mortality, affecting between 10%-89% of LTC patients, but little research has focused on delirium prevention in the LTC setting. This study will assess the effectiveness of a LTC multicomponent delirium prevention program (PREPARED Trial intervention). The PREPARED Trial intervention is an intervention provided to nursing staff working in LTC facilities that consists of four components: a decision tree, an instruction manual, a training package, and a toolkit. The feasibility and acceptability of the PREPARED Trial intervention has already been successfully demonstrated; however, a thorough and well-designed large scale study is needed in order to confirm its ability to reduce delirium among LTC residents. In this study, approximately 40-50 LTC facilities will be randomized to either receive the PREPARED Trial intervention or to receive usual care. At the end of the 4-year study period, the investigators will be able to demonstrate the degree to which the PREPARED Trial intervention reduces: 1) the number of new cases of delirium; 2) delirium severity; and 3) the duration of delirium episodes. This study will provide the blueprint of a program that can be transferable to LTC facilities across Canada.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Overall Goal: To reduce the incidence, severity, duration, and frequency of delirium episodes in cognitively impaired long-term care (LTC) residents at high risk for delirium.

Background: Delirium is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among older people admitted to both acute and LTC settings. Prevention, founded on a thorough understanding of associated risk factors, is the best approach for dealing with delirium. Several successful multicomponent interventions have been developed to reduce delirium incidence in the acute care setting (30%-73% reduction) by intervening on identified modifiable risk factors. Little work, however, has focused on using this approach to reduce delirium incidence in LTC. As such, co-investigators within the study team employed an integrated knowledge translation strategy to develop a LTC multicomponent delirium prevention program (PREPARED Trial intervention). The feasibility and acceptability of this program has been demonstrated using a participatory approach in two Quebec LTC facilities (LTCFs), and the program has received recognition by the scientific community. Given its large expected impact and high knowledge translation potential, a thorough and well-designed large-scale evaluation is urgently needed in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the multicomponent delirium prevention program in preventing delirium among high-risk LTC residents.

Primary Objective: To assess efficacy of the PREPARED Trial intervention in reducing delirium incidence, and delirium episode severity, duration, and frequency among cognitively impaired, high-risk LTC residents.

Secondary Objectives: To compare the effect of the PREPARED Trial intervention to that of usual care on the incidence of falls among cognitively impaired LTC residents, to estimate the association between medication use and delirium incidence in LTCFs, to estimate if there is an effect modification by motor subtype of delirium or by dementia subtype, and to measure the prevalence of delirium in participating institutions.

Tertiary Objectives: To compare the effect of the PREPARED Trial intervention on other health outcomes, including: changes in functional autonomy or social engagement, the number of transfers to acute care, consultations with healthcare providers, and mortality rates.

Methods: This 4-year cluster randomized study will involve nursing staff and residents in 40-50 public and semi-private LTC facilities in Quebec, Canada. Institutions within all 5 of the Montreal island Integrated University Health and Social Services networks (CIUSSS) and one private provincial network are currently participating. Approximately 900 LTC residents will be enrolled in the study and followed for 18 weeks only if they are at high risk of delirium and are delirium-free at baseline. The PREPARED Trial intervention is a program consisting of four components: a decision tree, an instruction manual, a training package and a toolkit. Primary study outcomes such as delirium incidence (measured by the Confusion Assessment Method), delirium severity (measured by the Delirium Index), and level of adherence to the PREPARED Trial protocol will be assessed weekly. Functional autonomy levels will be assessed at the beginning and end of follow-up, while information pertaining to modifiable delirium risk factors, medical consultations, and institutional transfers will be collected for the duration of the follow-up period. For primary analysis, hazard ratios will be modeled using Cox regression to compare the effect of the PREPARED Trial intervention to that of usual care on the time to first delirium episode. Clustering effects will be taken into account using frailty models, an extension of Cox regression for the addition of random effects.

Expected Outcomes and Significance: This large-scale intervention study will contribute significantly to the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines for delirium prevention in this frail elderly population, as it will be the first to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent delirium prevention program translated into LTC clinical practice on a large scale. In addition to reducing delirium in this frail population, deliverables include validation of this prevention program, as well as the transferring of its components (including bilingual video training modules for LTC staff) to relevant knowledge users across Canada.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Delirium Dementia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The PREPARED Trial is a 4-year cluster randomized intervention study. A cluster design was adopted in order to prevent contamination across the intervention and control arms by nursing staff who may provide replacement hours of employment at different units/floors within their long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Participating LTCFs (clusters) will be assigned to either the PREPARED Trial intervention or the control (usual care) arm of the study using a covariate constrained randomization procedure. In addition, given the need to assess each resident weekly for a follow-up period of 18 weeks and logistical limitations (large geographical coverage, 40-50 LTCFs included, and limited work force), the investigators will employ a sequential approach whereby sets of clusters (LTCFs) will be randomized into the two study arms in consecutive 'waves' of follow-up lasting 18 weeks each. It is estimated that 4 waves of trial follow-up, comprised of 10-12 clusters each, will be completed.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) cannot be blinded, as trial arm allocation will be obvious (those in the intervention group will undergo delirium prevention protocol training before their respective follow-up periods, and those in the control group will not). Similarly, research assistants (RAs) tasked with conducting resident assessments cannot be blinded to group allocation, as they will be constantly exposed to the everyday workings of participating LTCFs. However, RAs will be blinded to resident cognitive scores. All researchers analyzing the data will be blinded to group allocation, as LTCF names will be anonymized and randomization statuses will be concealed prior to data analysis.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PREPARED Trial Intervention

Participating nursing staff will be trained to apply the PREPARED Trial interventions, and will apply this knowledge to modify the therapeutic nursing plans of residents under their care who are enrolled in the study, accordingly.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PREPARED Trial Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Nursing staff members will be trained to adjust the therapeutic nursing plans (TNP) for residents enrolled in the study, as follows: 1) by providing optimal stimulation (surveying the use of eyeglasses and hearing aids, the room lighting and space organization; orienting the resident to time and space; and stimulating the resident using familiar objects, photos, and life histories); and 2) by assessing the presence of 4 modifiable delirium risk factors (antipsychotic use, sensory impairment, restraint use, and dehydration) and taking specific actions once a given risk factor is identified. For instance, if physical restraints are used, the TNP will require that they are to be removed during care when a caregiver is present (nail care, feeding, and wound care).

Care as Usual

Participating nursing staff will only be provided with general information about delirium, but will not be trained or instructed to modify the therapeutic nursing plans that are in place for residents enrolled in the study. However, at the end of the follow-up period, nursing staff in the control arm will be provided with the PREPARED Trial intervention training program (including bedside coaching), which they can then use after the study has ended at their facility.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PREPARED Trial Intervention

Nursing staff members will be trained to adjust the therapeutic nursing plans (TNP) for residents enrolled in the study, as follows: 1) by providing optimal stimulation (surveying the use of eyeglasses and hearing aids, the room lighting and space organization; orienting the resident to time and space; and stimulating the resident using familiar objects, photos, and life histories); and 2) by assessing the presence of 4 modifiable delirium risk factors (antipsychotic use, sensory impairment, restraint use, and dehydration) and taking specific actions once a given risk factor is identified. For instance, if physical restraints are used, the TNP will require that they are to be removed during care when a caregiver is present (nail care, feeding, and wound care).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* has dementia and/or cognitive impairment (as determined by discussions with the nursing staff and chart abstraction);
* a minimum length of stay in the LTC institution of at least two weeks prior to the start of the baseline assessments;
* at high risk of delirium, as indicated by a score of 3 or higher on a validated 5-item delirium risk screening tool;
* delirium-free at baseline, as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), the Delirium Index (DI) and a brief chart review over a screening period of two consecutive weeks.

Exclusion Criteria

* unable to communicate verbally in English or French (as determined by either the nursing staff or two consecutive 0-score administrations of the composite cognitive interview at screening);
* has a history of specific psychiatric conditions (bipolar disorder, depression with signs of psychosis, and psychotic disorders) or intellectual disability;
* is receiving comfort/end-of-life care.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McGill University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Machelle Wilchesky

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Machelle Wilchesky, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McGill University

Philippe Voyer, Inf. PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Laval University

Nathalie Champoux, MD, MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Université de Montréal

Antonio Ciampi, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

McGill University

Ovidiu Lungu, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Université de Montréal

Jane McCusker, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

McGill University

Johanne Monette, MD, MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research

T.T. Minh Vu, MD, FRCPC

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Association des établissements privés conventionnés

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre for East Montreal

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre for North Montreal

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre for South-Central Montreal

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre for West Montreal

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre for West-Central Montreal

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elie M, Rousseau F, Cole M, Primeau F, McCusker J, Bellavance F. Prevalence and detection of delirium in elderly emergency department patients. CMAJ. 2000 Oct 17;163(8):977-81.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11068569 (View on PubMed)

Fick DM, Agostini JV, Inouye SK. Delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Oct;50(10):1723-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50468.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12366629 (View on PubMed)

Lemiengre J, Nelis T, Joosten E, Braes T, Foreman M, Gastmans C, Milisen K. Detection of delirium by bedside nurses using the confusion assessment method. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Apr;54(4):685-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00667.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16686883 (View on PubMed)

Voyer P, Richard S, Doucet L, Carmichael PH. Detecting delirium and subsyndromal delirium using different diagnostic criteria among demented long-term care residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Mar;10(3):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.09.006. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19233058 (View on PubMed)

McCusker J, Cole MG, Voyer P, Monette J, Champoux N, Ciampi A, Vu M, Belzile E. Prevalence and incidence of delirium in long-term care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;26(11):1152-61. doi: 10.1002/gps.2654. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21274904 (View on PubMed)

Cole MG. Persistent delirium in older hospital patients. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010 May;23(3):250-4. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833861f6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20224406 (View on PubMed)

Cole MG, McCusker J. Treatment of delirium in older medical inpatients: a challenge for geriatric specialists. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Dec;50(12):2101-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50634.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12473034 (View on PubMed)

Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford TR, Cooney LM Jr. A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):669-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903043400901.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10053175 (View on PubMed)

Reston JT, Schoelles KM. In-facility delirium prevention programs as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):375-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23460093 (View on PubMed)

Vidan MT, Sanchez E, Alonso M, Montero B, Ortiz J, Serra JA. An intervention integrated into daily clinical practice reduces the incidence of delirium during hospitalization in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Nov;57(11):2029-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02485.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19754498 (View on PubMed)

Hshieh TT, Yue J, Oh E, Puelle M, Dowal S, Travison T, Inouye SK. Effectiveness of multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium interventions: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):512-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7779.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25643002 (View on PubMed)

Martinez F, Tobar C, Hill N. Preventing delirium: should non-pharmacological, multicomponent interventions be used? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):196-204. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu173. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25424450 (View on PubMed)

Gentric A, Le Deun P, Estivin S. [Prevention of delirium in an acute geriatric care unit]. Rev Med Interne. 2007 Sep;28(9):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 15. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17512095 (View on PubMed)

Pisani MA, Murphy TE, Van Ness PH, Araujo KL, Inouye SK. Characteristics associated with delirium in older patients in a medical intensive care unit. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Aug 13-27;167(15):1629-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.15.1629.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17698685 (View on PubMed)

Voyer P, McCusker J, Cole MG, Monette J, Champoux N, Vu M, Ciampi A, Sanche S, Richard S, de Raad M. Feasibility and acceptability of a delirium prevention program for cognitively impaired long term care residents: a participatory approach. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jan;15(1):77.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24094898 (View on PubMed)

Rockwood K. Making delirium prevention acceptable in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jan;15(1):6-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 8. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24113630 (View on PubMed)

Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2240918 (View on PubMed)

Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK. The Confusion Assessment Method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 May;56(5):823-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01674.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18384586 (View on PubMed)

McCusker J, Cole MG, Dendukuri N, Belzile E. The delirium index, a measure of the severity of delirium: new findings on reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Oct;52(10):1744-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52471.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15450055 (View on PubMed)

Allison PD (1995) Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Inc.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Klein J. ea (2003) Survival Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Therneau TM, Grambsch PM (2000) Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model: Springer Science & Business Media.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wilchesky M, Ballard SA, Voyer P, McCusker J, Lungu O, Champoux N, Vu TTM, Cole MG, Monette J, Ciampi A, Belzile E, Carmichael PH, McConnell T. The PREvention Program for Alzheimer's RElated Delirium (PREPARED) cluster randomized trial: a study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 16;21(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02558-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34784897 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PT 71435

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.