Ethnographic Study of the Everyday Life of Men With Prostate Cancer, Focusing on Diet, Activities and Digital Behavior

NCT ID: NCT03692585

Last Updated: 2018-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is an ethnographic study to investigate the competences and preferences in everyday living of men with prostate cancer, using participant observation and semi-structured interviews.

The study will work as the need assessment part of the emil project, which aims to design, develop, implement and evaluate a digital service to support a healthy lifestyle among men with prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Data was collected between June 2015 and April 2016. The data set included 4 parts; introducing interviews, participant observation, concluding interviews and questionnaires.

The introducing interview is conducted as a semi-structured interview with an interview guide. An informal approach is chosen to help along the report needed for the participant observation. The interview is recorded.

During participant observations, the participant is accompanied by the researcher, as he goes about his daily life. The researcher is participating in his activities to the extend it is possible, carrying out spontaneous informal interviews along the way taking cues from the situation, as is inherent to the participation of the researcher during participant observations. Field jottings are done discretely, during breaks in the observation or afterwards, on dictaphone or computer, in order to keep the relation informal, and not redirect the attention to the fact that they were being observed.

The concluding interview is performed as a natural ending of the collaboration between researcher and participant. It is performed as a semi-structured interview with an interview guide, and the central point is to confirm and elaborate on findings of the observation. The interview is recorded.

Pictures are taken of relevant artefacts or sceneries through all visits between participant and researcher, with the consent of the participants. Pictures are a part of the dataset on equal terms with observational notes and interview transcriptions.

In the questionnaire, baseline information such as educational level and self-rated health is gathered along with measurement of eHealth literacy (eHLQ) and health literacy (HLQ), both multidimensional validated psychometric instruments with seven and nine dimensions respectively, in order to relate the demography of this first study to the later studies of the emil project. The questionnaire is not used in the analysis of this study.

All data is collected before beginning familiarization and analysis of data.

Data analysis and interpretation The data set is analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke (2006). All interviews and observations are conducted by the first author. Interviews, both introducing and concluding, are transcribed verbatim except for parts not included in the dataset, such as parts where the formal information about the study is given and written consent obtained or parts where practical arrangements are made.

All observational data are written together in one document from each visit. All pictures are included in the dataset. Familiarization with the data will be by listening and relistenning, reading and rereading through the dataset.

The thematic analysis will be performed by coding, processing and interpretation of data using the qualitative research software Nvivo11. Codes are re-read, discussed in the research group, re-coded and themed as outlined by the phases of Braun and Clarke, ending up with a thematic map.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Computer Literacy Health Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men with a history of prostate cancer, self-reported

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants will be excused from participation if they do not have sufficient written and spoken Danish language skills for participation in the activities involved in the studies. The researcher will assess whether the participants have sufficient cognitive functions to participate in the study. The researcher can also judge from an ethical perspective that the participant, for reasons not stated in the protocol, should be excused from participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

TrygFonden, Denmark

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Danish Cancer Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dorthe Furstrand

Ph.d. fellow, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anne Tjønneland, MD PhD DMSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Danish Cancer Society Research Center

Lars Kayser, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Copenhagen, Dept. of Public Health

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Tryg-7-12-0736

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DCS-53232017-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Quality of Life in Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT04357925 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Prostate Cancer E-Health-Tutorial
NCT02503748 COMPLETED NA
PC 360 Survivorship
NCT03017456 COMPLETED NA