Ethnographic Study of the Everyday Life of Men With Prostate Cancer, Focusing on Diet, Activities and Digital Behavior
NCT ID: NCT03692585
Last Updated: 2018-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-06-30
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will work as the need assessment part of the emil project, which aims to design, develop, implement and evaluate a digital service to support a healthy lifestyle among men with prostate cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Designing a Digital Tool to Support Healthy Lifestyle in Men With Prostate Cancer
NCT03692000
Digitally Captured Activity Data and PROs to Monitor Physical Function in Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT04575402
The Remote Study: Investigating the Effects or Online Exercise on Quality of Life in Men With Prostate Cancer
NCT05989854
Feasibility Study Testing a Sleep Intervention in Prostate Cancer Patients With Insomnia
NCT03444532
Adaptation of an eHealth (Web-application) Platform for Delivery of a Sedentary Behavior Intervention Among Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT03740035
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The introducing interview is conducted as a semi-structured interview with an interview guide. An informal approach is chosen to help along the report needed for the participant observation. The interview is recorded.
During participant observations, the participant is accompanied by the researcher, as he goes about his daily life. The researcher is participating in his activities to the extend it is possible, carrying out spontaneous informal interviews along the way taking cues from the situation, as is inherent to the participation of the researcher during participant observations. Field jottings are done discretely, during breaks in the observation or afterwards, on dictaphone or computer, in order to keep the relation informal, and not redirect the attention to the fact that they were being observed.
The concluding interview is performed as a natural ending of the collaboration between researcher and participant. It is performed as a semi-structured interview with an interview guide, and the central point is to confirm and elaborate on findings of the observation. The interview is recorded.
Pictures are taken of relevant artefacts or sceneries through all visits between participant and researcher, with the consent of the participants. Pictures are a part of the dataset on equal terms with observational notes and interview transcriptions.
In the questionnaire, baseline information such as educational level and self-rated health is gathered along with measurement of eHealth literacy (eHLQ) and health literacy (HLQ), both multidimensional validated psychometric instruments with seven and nine dimensions respectively, in order to relate the demography of this first study to the later studies of the emil project. The questionnaire is not used in the analysis of this study.
All data is collected before beginning familiarization and analysis of data.
Data analysis and interpretation The data set is analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke (2006). All interviews and observations are conducted by the first author. Interviews, both introducing and concluding, are transcribed verbatim except for parts not included in the dataset, such as parts where the formal information about the study is given and written consent obtained or parts where practical arrangements are made.
All observational data are written together in one document from each visit. All pictures are included in the dataset. Familiarization with the data will be by listening and relistenning, reading and rereading through the dataset.
The thematic analysis will be performed by coding, processing and interpretation of data using the qualitative research software Nvivo11. Codes are re-read, discussed in the research group, re-coded and themed as outlined by the phases of Braun and Clarke, ending up with a thematic map.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
40 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
TrygFonden, Denmark
INDUSTRY
Danish Cancer Society
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dorthe Furstrand
Ph.d. fellow, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anne Tjønneland, MD PhD DMSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Danish Cancer Society Research Center
Lars Kayser, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Copenhagen, Dept. of Public Health
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Tryg-7-12-0736
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DCS-53232017-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.