Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-01
2022-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient and Provider Outcomes of E-Learning Training in Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality
NCT00905827
Pilot Study of a Brief Intervention for Medically Hospitalized Suicide Attempt Survivors
NCT02414763
Teachable Moment Brief Intervention for Veterans Following a Suicide Attempt
NCT03533075
High Risk Suicidal Behavior in Veterans
NCT02462694
Suicide Prevention After Community Care Discharge
NCT06596044
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire will be administered at three- and six-month follow-up for each study participant. This will allow reflection on the acceptability and perceived utility of CAMS-G. Notes will be kept on patients who decided to drop out of the intervention and/or the study. The outcome of this aim is evidence that the final CAMS-G manual and study procedures that would be used in an efficacy trial are acceptable to participants. The investigators will examine the mean and standard deviation for the total score and individual items to determine if study participants report acceptable ratings of satisfaction. The investigators will review the responses to open ended questions regarding what Veterans perceived as being helpful about their group experience and what they could do in the future if they become suicidal.
The investigators will tabulate average scores and standard deviations for the overall rating and each individual item on the CAMS-G Rating Scale to determine whether the facilitators maintained fidelity to the treatment manual over the course of the study.
The investigators will tally the different services received by study participants in order to accurately describe what care as usual consisted of for all study participants, regardless of their assigned treatment condition. This will also the investigators to control for any major differences in care as usual between treatment conditions, for example more individual psychotherapy for one condition, when examining between group differences on outcomes of interest.
At the termination of data collection, the investigators will complete a data cleansing process. Descriptive statistics for demographic and clinical variables will be tabulated. All scales will be scored and subscales described. This process will include examining the data for missing values, appropriate ranges, and outliers, with transformations to skewed data applied as needed. Although the randomization design should ensure balance between the two groups, it is essential to control for any known confounders in the design and analysis to prevent a biased assessment of the suicide assessment effect. Any baseline demographic or clinical variables found to be statistically significant in the analysis and significantly associated with the outcomes of interest will be included as covariates in all analytic models.
Dropouts and missing data. The investigators will use an intent-to-treat sample to complete our analyses. That is, all participants who provide consent, are randomized to a treatment condition, and attend at least one group therapy session will be included in the analyses regardless of whether they drop out or complete a full course of group therapy. To understand whether treatment drops were completely random, random, or informative, the investigators will analyze our missing data and adjust our interpretation of the results accordingly. The investigators will use generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to measure differences at 1-, 3-, and 6-months follow-up between veterans in the CAMS-G treatment condition and those in the control treatment condition on constructs of Hopelessness, Thwarted Belongingness, Perceived Burdensomeness, Overall Symptom Distress, and Reasons for Living. The investigators will use Poisson or similar variant of generlized linear mixed modeling (GLMM) for skewed and count data to measure differences at 1-, 3-, and 6-months follow-up between Veterans in the CAMS-G treatment condition and those in the control treatment condition on severity of suicidal ideation and incidence of self-directed violence.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAMS-G
CAMS-G is an group-based adaptation of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) that has been developed to address perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness, two drivers of suicide risk. Ongoing assessment and treatment planning are completed using the CAMS Suicide Status Form in the group modality, with involvement from group members and group facilitators. Driver-focused intervention strategies and group process also occur in the group based upon the unique needs of the group members. Groups are 90-minutes in length and occur on a weekly basis.
CAMS-G
Group-based suicide-specific intervention based upon the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality.
Care as Usual
Care as usual includes access to all existing forms of treatment that currently exist at the Robley Rex VAMC and affiliated CBOCs, such as individual and group psychotherapy, suicide prevention programming and case management, psychiatric care, social work services, and substance use disorder counseling. We will essentially track the control condition over time as they engage in the typical services provided to suicidal Veterans through the Robley Rex VAMC. The CAMS-G study participants will have access to the same services delivered as part of care as usual, with the only difference being their participation in the CAMS-G treatment for suicidality.
CAMS-G
Group-based suicide-specific intervention based upon the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CAMS-G
Group-based suicide-specific intervention based upon the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Endorses suicidality (acknowledges recent/current suicidal thoughts, plans, and/or behavior and wish to work on it clinically).
3. Veteran is willing to engage in treatment around the suicidality.
4. Eligible to receive care at the Robley Rex VA Medical Center
5. English speaking based on the need to participate in group treatment
Exclusion Criteria
2. A Veteran could be excluded if he or she has a circumstance that could be harmful to other members who are already in the group (e.g., we will not enroll a sex offender who is working on that issue into a group with a victim of sexual abuse).
3. A Veteran who is unwilling to meaningfully engage in treatment (e.g., unwilling to reduce access to lethal means, directly address suicidal drivers, engage in collaborative treatment planning, develop a safety plan, participate in group discussion, etc.) is inappropriate for participation in the group on an outpatient basis.
4. Veterans will be excluded if they have previously been in a CAMS-G treatment
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rocky Mountain MIRECC for Suicide Prevention
UNKNOWN
Louisville VA Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lora Johnson
Research Facilitator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eleanor Lederer, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Louisville VAMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Robley Rex VAMC
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gutierrez PM, Johnson L, Podlogar MC, Hagman S, Muehler TA, Hanson J, Pierson JT, Brown AA, O'Connor S. Pilot study of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality-Group. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Apr;52(2):244-255. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12817. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00467
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.