Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Comparing Risankizumab to Placebo in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Who Have a History of Inadequate Response to or Intolerance to at Least One Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Therapy (NCT NCT03675308)
NCT ID: NCT03675308
Last Updated: 2025-08-05
Results Overview
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
964 participants
Baseline and Week 24
2025-08-05
Participant Flow
Participants were enrolled at 186 sites in 38 countries globally. The study includes a 24-week double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period (Period 1) and an ongoing 184-week open-label treatment period (Period 2). Results are reported for Period 1 which was from 25 March 2019 to 8 October 2020.
Participants were randomized equally (1:1 ratio) to receive double-blind treatment with risankizumab 150 mg or matched placebo for 24 weeks. Randomization was stratified by extent of psoriasis (≥ 3% body surface area \[BSA\] or \< 3% BSA), current conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) use (0 vs ≥ 1), presence of dactylitis (yes vs no), and presence of enthesitis (yes vs no) at Baseline.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
Participants randomized to receive 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
481
|
483
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
467
|
473
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
Participants randomized to receive 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) Logistical Restrictions
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Participants with available data
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=481 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=483 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Total
n=964 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.10 • n=481 Participants
|
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.21 • n=483 Participants
|
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.15 • n=964 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
< 65 years
|
408 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
414 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
822 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
|
73 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
142 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
247 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
231 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
478 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
234 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
252 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
486 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
92 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
185 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
389 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
390 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
779 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
451 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
454 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
905 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
22 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
5 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Current Use of csDMARD
Yes
|
364 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
366 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
730 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Current Use of csDMARD
No
|
117 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
234 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Extent of Psoriasis
< 3% BSA
|
209 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
210 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
419 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Extent of Psoriasis
≥ 3% BSA
|
272 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
273 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
545 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Presence of Dactylitis
Yes
|
147 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
148 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
295 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Presence of Dactylitis
No
|
334 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
335 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
669 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Presence of Enthesitis
Yes
|
290 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
297 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
587 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Presence of Enthesitis
No
|
191 Participants
n=481 Participants
|
186 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
377 Participants
n=964 Participants
|
|
Tender Joint Count
|
20.5 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.79 • n=481 Participants
|
20.8 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.05 • n=483 Participants
|
20.6 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.43 • n=964 Participants
|
|
Swollen Joint Count
|
12.2 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02 • n=481 Participants
|
12.1 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.80 • n=483 Participants
|
12.2 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91 • n=964 Participants
|
|
Patient's Assessment of Pain
|
57.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.61 • n=479 Participants • Participants with available data
|
57.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.57 • n=482 Participants • Participants with available data
|
57.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.58 • n=961 Participants • Participants with available data
|
|
Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
|
57.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.06 • n=479 Participants • Participants with availabe data
|
57.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.75 • n=482 Participants • Participants with availabe data
|
57.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.89 • n=961 Participants • Participants with availabe data
|
|
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
|
62.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.99 • n=461 Participants • Participants with available data
|
61.3 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.64 • n=466 Participants • Participants with available data
|
61.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.32 • n=927 Participants • Participants with available data
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
|
1.17 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.651 • n=479 Participants • Participants with available data
|
1.15 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.664 • n=482 Participants • Participants with available data
|
1.16 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.658 • n=961 Participants • Participants with available data
|
|
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Level
|
11.33 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.122 • n=481 Participants
|
11.88 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.933 • n=483 Participants
|
11.60 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.051 • n=964 Participants
|
|
Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score
|
10.04 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.436 • n=271 Participants • Participants with psoriasis BSA involvement ≥ 3% at Baseline
|
10.89 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.052 • n=273 Participants • Participants with psoriasis BSA involvement ≥ 3% at Baseline
|
10.47 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.244 • n=544 Participants • Participants with psoriasis BSA involvement ≥ 3% at Baseline
|
|
Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score
|
16.56 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.045 • n=338 Participants • Participants with psoriatic nail disease at Baseline
|
18.13 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.443 • n=309 Participants • Participants with psoriatic nail disease at Baseline
|
17.31 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.243 • n=647 Participants • Participants with psoriatic nail disease at Baseline
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Fingernail Psoriasis Score (PGA-F)
|
2.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.00 • n=338 Participants • Participants with psoriatic nail disease at Baseline
|
2.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04 • n=309 Participants • Participants with psoriatic nail disease at Baseline
|
2.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02 • n=647 Participants • Participants with psoriatic nail disease at Baseline
|
|
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
|
35.15 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.692 • n=477 Participants • Participants with available data
|
35.24 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.094 • n=482 Participants • Participants with available data
|
35.20 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.893 • n=959 Participants • Participants with available data
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score
|
29.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.23 • n=477 Participants • Participants with available data
|
29.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.28 • n=482 Participants • Participants with available data
|
29.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.25 • n=959 Participants • Participants with available data
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (MI) to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=481 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=483 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 24
|
33.5 percentage of participants
Interval 29.3 to 37.8
|
57.3 percentage of participants
Interval 52.9 to 61.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set; a mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 24, excluding data after initiation of rescue medication or initiation of concomitant medications for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) use that could meaningfully impact efficacy assessment, was used.
The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire that measures the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and errands and chores) over the past week. Participants assessed their ability to do each task on a scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Scores were averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 represents very severe, high-dependency disability. A negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=479 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=482 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline In Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24
|
-0.11 score on a scale
Interval -0.16 to -0.06
|
-0.31 score on a scale
Interval -0.36 to -0.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set participants with Baseline psoriasis BSA involvement ≥ 3%; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
PASI is a composite score based on the percentage of the body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis and the intensity of erythema (reddening), induration (thickening or hardening of the skin), and desquamation (peeling of the skin) of lesions assessed at 4 anatomic sites (head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities). At each location, the percentage of BSA involvement is assigned a score from 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and erythema, induration, and desquamation are scored on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very marked). The PASI score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). A PASI 90 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in PASI score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=272 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=273 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 24
|
9.9 percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 13.5
|
52.3 percentage of participants
Interval 46.4 to 58.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16Population: Full analysis set; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=481 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=483 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 16
|
33.4 percentage of participants
Interval 28.9 to 37.9
|
56.3 percentage of participants
Interval 51.7 to 60.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Full analysis set; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
A participant was classified as achieving MDA if 5 of the following 7 criteria were met: * Tender joint count (out of 68 joints) ≤ 1 * Swollen joint count (out of 66 joints) ≤ 1 * PASI score ≤ 1 (score ranges from 0 - 72) or percent BSA involved with psoriasis ≤ 3% * Patient's assessment of pain ≤ 15 (VAS from 0 to 100) * Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity ≤ 20 (VAS from 0 to 100) * HAQ-DI score ≤ 0.5 (index score ranges from 0 to 3) * Leeds Enthesitis Index ≤ 1 (assesses the presence or absence of enthesitis at 3 bilateral sites, for an overall score range from 0 to 6)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=481 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=483 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 24
|
10.2 percentage of participants
Interval 7.5 to 12.9
|
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 28.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set with nail psoriasis at Baseline; a mixed effect model repeat measurement analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 24, excluding data after initiation of rescue medication or initiation of concomitant medications for psoriatic arthritis use that could meaningfully impact efficacy assessment, was used.
The investigator assessed each fingernail for onycholysis (separation of the nail plate from the nail bed) and oil-drop (salmon patch) dyschromia (reddish-brown discoloration under the nail plate) on a scale of 0 (none present) to 3 (\>30% of the nail), pitting (small, sharply defined depressions in the nail surface) on a scale of 0 (0 pits present) to 3 (\> 50 pits present), and nail plate crumbling on a scale of 0 (no crumbling) to 3 (\>50% of nail has crumbling) and presence (1) or absence (0) of leukonychia (white spots), splinter hemorrhages, nail bed hyperkeratosis, and red spots in the lunula. The mNAPSI score is calculated as the sum of all the components for all of the participant's fingernails giving a range of possible scores from 0 (absence of nail psoriasis) to 130 (the most severe nail psoriasis). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=338 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=309 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score at Week 24
|
-5.57 score on a scale
Interval -6.7 to -4.44
|
-9.76 score on a scale
Interval -10.95 to -8.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set with nail psoriasis at Baseline; a mixed effect model repeat measurement analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 24, excluding data after initiation of rescue medication or initiation of concomitant medications for psoriatic arthritis use that could meaningfully impact efficacy assessment, was used.
The PGA-F is a clinician-rated outcomes assessment used to measure the severity of signs and symptoms associated with fingernail psoriasis. Participant's fingernails were assessed separately for nail bed signs and nail matrix signs of disease on a scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). A participant's overall global score is the worse of the nail bed score and nail matrix score. For example, if a participant had a nail bed score '2' and a nail matrix score of '4,' this participant's overall score was '4.' A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=338 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=309 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fingernail-Physician Global Assessment (PGA-F)
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Interval -0.5 to -0.3
|
-0.8 score on a scale
Interval -1.0 to -0.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Full analysis set participants with a Baseline LEI \> 0; Includes pooled data from KEEPsAKE 1 (this study) and the companion study M15-998 (NCT03671148; KEEPsAKE2). Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
Resolution of enthesitis is defined as a Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) score = 0. LEI is an enthesitis measure developed specifically for PsA and assesses the presence or absence of tenderness at the following 3 bilateral enthesial sites: medial femoral condyles, lateral epicondyles of the humerus, and Achilles tendon insertions. Tenderness on examination is recorded as either present (coded as 1), absent (coded as 0), or not assessed for each of the 6 sites. The LEI is calculated by taking the sum of the scores from the 6 sites. The LEI ranges from 0 to 6 (worst). To increase the sample size due to the smaller number of participants with enthesitis at Baseline, the pre-specified analysis of the resolution of enthesitis included pooled data from KEEPsAKE 1 (this study) and the companion study KEEPsAKE 2 (M15-998; NCT03671148).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=448 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=444 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 24
|
34.8 percentage of participants
Interval 30.4 to 39.2
|
48.4 percentage of participants
Interval 43.8 to 53.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Full analysis set participants with a Baseline LDI \> 0; Includes pooled data from KEEPsAKE 1 (this study) and the companion study M15-998 (NCT03671148; KEEPsAKE2). Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
Resolution of dactylitis is defined as a Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) score = 0. LDI basic is a score based on finger circumference and tenderness, assessed across all digits. The LDI basic measures the ratio of the circumference of the affected digit to the circumference of the digit on the opposite hand or foot, using a minimum difference of 10% to define a dactylitic digit. The ratio of circumference is multiplied by a tenderness score (1 for tender, 0 for non-tender). If both sides of a digit are considered involved, or the circumference of the contralateral digit cannot be obtained, a standard reference table is used. Scores from each digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis. To increase sample size due to the smaller number of participants with dactylitis at Baseline, the pre-specified analysis of the resolution of dactylitis included pooled data from KEEPsAKE 1 (this study) and the companion study KEEPsAKE 2 (M15-998; NCT03671148).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=204 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=188 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 24
|
51.0 percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 57.8
|
68.1 percentage of participants
Interval 61.4 to 74.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set participants with available data at Baseline; linear extrapolation was used for participants who discontinued prior to Week 24 or who were rescued prior to Week 24.
The Sharp-van der Heijde modified scoring method for PsA measures the level of joint damage from radiographs of the hands and feet, and was assessed by 2 independent, blinded readers. Joint erosion severity was assessed in 20 joints in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in each foot. Each joint was scored from 0 (no erosion) to 5 for hands/wrists or to 10 for feet (complete collapse). The total erosion score ranges from 0 to 320 (worst). Joint space narrowing (JSN) was assessed in 20 joints of each hand and wrist, and 6 joints of each foot, from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation). The total JSN score ranges from 0 to 208 (worst). Joints with gross osteolysis or pencil in cup were assigned the maximum score for both erosions and JSN. The total mTSS score is the sum of the joint erosion and JSN scores and ranges from 0 (normal) to 528 (worst).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=457 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=458 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in PsA Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 24
|
0.32 score on a scale
Interval 0.11 to 0.53
|
0.23 score on a scale
Interval 0.02 to 0.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set; a mixed effect model repeat measurement analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 24, excluding data after initiation of rescue medication or initiation of concomitant medications for psoriatic arthritis use that could meaningfully impact efficacy assessment, was used.
The Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life during the past 4 weeks. The SF-36 consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The physical component summary is a weighted combination of the 8 subscales with positive weighting for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The SF-36 PCS ranges from 0 to 100. A linear algorithm was applied to the calculation of the PCS which has a normative mean value of 50. Higher scores are associated with less disability; a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability and a score of 0 is equivalent to maximum disability. A positive change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=477 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=482 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline In 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24
|
3.20 score on a scale
Interval 2.5 to 3.89
|
6.52 score on a scale
Interval 5.83 to 7.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set; a mixed effect model repeat measurement analysis with longitudinal data from observed cases up to Week 24, excluding data after initiation of rescue medication or initiation of concomitant medications for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) use that could meaningfully impact efficacy assessment, was used.
The FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire is a self-administered patient questionnaire that consists of 13 questions designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by participants in the previous 7 days, including physical fatigue (e.g., I feel tired), functional fatigue (e.g., trouble finishing things), emotional fatigue (e.g., frustration), and social consequences of fatigue (e.g., limits social activity). Participants respond to the questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The FACIT-Fatigue score is computed by summing the item scores, after reversing those items that are worded in the negative direction. The FACIT-Fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=477 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=482 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline In Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
|
3.9 score on a scale
Interval 3.1 to 4.7
|
6.5 score on a scale
Interval 5.6 to 7.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1. ≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=481 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=483 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 24
|
11.3 percentage of participants
Interval 8.4 to 14.1
|
33.4 percentage of participants
Interval 29.2 to 37.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Full analysis set; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used in the analysis.
Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Physician global assessment of disease activity * Patient global assessment of disease activity * Patient assessment of pain * Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) * High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=481 Participants
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=483 Participants
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 24
|
4.7 percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 6.7
|
15.3 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 18.5
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Risankizumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=481 participants at risk
Participants received placebo administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
Risankizumab
n=483 participants at risk
Participants received 150 mg risankizumab administered by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, Week 4, and Week 16 in Period 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
ANAEMIA
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
BLOOD LOSS ANAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
IRON DEFICIENCY ANAEMIA
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Cardiac disorders
ANGINA UNSTABLE
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
VERTIGO
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
COLITIS
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DUODENAL ULCER
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
SMALL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLECYSTITIS
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLELITHIASIS
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
APPENDICITIS PERFORATED
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
CELLULITIS
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
COMPLICATED APPENDICITIS
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
DYSENTERY
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
ORAL BACTERIAL INFECTION
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
|
0.42%
2/481 • Number of events 2 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA VIRAL
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
UROSEPSIS
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Infections and infestations
VIRAL UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRITIS
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PSORIATIC ARTHROPATHY
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ROTATOR CUFF SYNDROME
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
BREAST CANCER
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
URETEROCELE
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMONIA ASPIRATION
|
0.00%
0/481 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.21%
1/483 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PSORIASIS
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PUSTULAR PSORIASIS
|
0.21%
1/481 • Number of events 1 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
0.00%
0/483 • From first dose of study drug to Week 24
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER