To Evaluate the Use of Bioresorbable Tephaflex™ Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT ID: NCT03673488
Last Updated: 2018-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-06-22
2020-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Midurethral slings are commonly made of polypropylene (PP). Although the polypropylene products are effective and have relatively low rates of adverse events, the adverse events that do occur, like exposure and pain, have been related to the fact that a permanent synthetic mesh is implanted. Mesh-related complications are difficult to manage and may even involve partial or complete removal of the implant.
Clinically, there is a need to investigate whether mid-urethral sling surgery can be performed with a non-permanent mesh made from a resorbable biomaterial, as an alternative for PP. Non-permanent meshes may be associated with fewer complications and better quality of life. However, before non-permanent and permanent mesh procedures can be compared, there is a need to first establish the feasibility of using a mesh in a mid-urethral sling procedure.
The investigators hypothesize that a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence, can be successfully performed using an implant made of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rehabilitation With Mobile Applications in Women With SUI
NCT04518683
Transobturator Sling Compared With Single-incision Mini-sling for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT02540525
Post Market Clinical Study to Evaluate a Mid-Urethral Vaginal Tape Procedure With a Pre-Pubic Delivery Approach, for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT00688298
Post Market Study Of Single Incision Sling Versus Transobturator Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT01784588
Transobturator Urethral Sling Placement With an Autologous Rectus Facia
NCT03949348
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prospective, observational single-center study with a follow-up of 24 months post-surgery. Up to 25 patients will be recruited at Groote Schuur Hospital Urogynecology Out-Patient Department. Eligible patients will receive a retropubic surgical producedure where a TephaFLEX sling, composed of the resorbable material P4HB, is placed. After the surgical procedure, follow-up visits are scheduled at 4-6 weeks, 3 months (+/- 2 weeks), 6 months (+/- 2 weeks), 12 months (+/- 1 month), and 24 months (+/- 1 month) post-procedure. TephaFLEX sling, manufactured by Tepha, Inc., will be implanted via a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure for treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence. The product is supplied as a sterile, single-use device. One device will be utilized per patient. TephaFLEX sling, developed specifically for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, is a single layer, bioresorbable, mesh made from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament fiber. The mesh is constructed as a 11mm x 60cm tape with an open pore structure, and is enclosed in a polyethylene sleeve to ease insertion. The mesh was designed specifically to provide strength over the three-month critical wound healing period in soft tissue repair and reinforcement, and to encourage the proliferation of healthy tissue at the repair site. The product undergoes a gradual loss of strength after implantation and is essentially resorbed by 18 - 24 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling for SUI
P4HB material ( TephaFlex ™) will be implanted in 25 women with confirmed Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI).
TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling
The sling is made from P4HB material. It is placed in a similar technique to standard retropubic sling procedures, but will resorb over 18-24 months post surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling
The sling is made from P4HB material. It is placed in a similar technique to standard retropubic sling procedures, but will resorb over 18-24 months post surgery.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Female symptomatic (moderate or severe) SUI resulting from urethral hypermobility and/or intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).
3. Patients who have planned to undergo surgical correction of symptomatic SUI after consultation with their physician about the risks and benefits of such a procedure, and a determination by the physician that surgical treatment is the most appropriate treatment option for the patient.
4. Understand and be willing to follow all aspects of the study protocol and have signed and dated the EC-approved Informed Consent prior to any study-related procedures being performed
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects who have stage 2 or more genital prolapse, according to the ICS classification
3. Subjects with previous surgery for SUI
4. Subjects who undergo concomitant surgical procedures
5. Subjects who are pregnant or want to become pregnant in the next 24 months
6. Subjects who are not capable of giving informed consent
7. Subjects with a BMI = 35 kg/m2
8. Subjects diagnosed with a current urinary tract infection or chronic urinary tract infections (defined as 4 or more UTI in the last year)
9. Subjects with known sensitivity to tetracycline or kanamycin
18 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cape Town
OTHER
Pelvic Floor Research Foundation of South Africa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jan-Paul Roovers, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Pelvic Floor Research Foundation of South Africa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groote Schuur Academic Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
URO001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.