To Evaluate the Use of Bioresorbable Tephaflex™ Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT03673488

Last Updated: 2018-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-22

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a major public health issue affecting up to 25-50% of all women and has a detrimental impact on patient quality of life. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common form of urinary incontinence and is defined as the leakage of urine, which occurs during physical activity of exertion or on sneezing or coughing. It has been reported that the prevalence of SUI is 25 to 45% of the female population. If pelvic floor exercises are not effective, mid-urethral slings (MUS) are widely used as a first-line surgical treatment. Subjective and objective cure rates of 91% and 85% respectively have been reported for retropubic midurethral slings.

Midurethral slings are commonly made of polypropylene (PP). Although the polypropylene products are effective and have relatively low rates of adverse events, the adverse events that do occur, like exposure and pain, have been related to the fact that a permanent synthetic mesh is implanted. Mesh-related complications are difficult to manage and may even involve partial or complete removal of the implant.

Clinically, there is a need to investigate whether mid-urethral sling surgery can be performed with a non-permanent mesh made from a resorbable biomaterial, as an alternative for PP. Non-permanent meshes may be associated with fewer complications and better quality of life. However, before non-permanent and permanent mesh procedures can be compared, there is a need to first establish the feasibility of using a mesh in a mid-urethral sling procedure.

The investigators hypothesize that a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence, can be successfully performed using an implant made of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overall objective of this study is to determine the preliminary safety and efficacy of resorbable TephaFLEX sling implanted via a retropubic procedure to treat SUI.

Prospective, observational single-center study with a follow-up of 24 months post-surgery. Up to 25 patients will be recruited at Groote Schuur Hospital Urogynecology Out-Patient Department. Eligible patients will receive a retropubic surgical producedure where a TephaFLEX sling, composed of the resorbable material P4HB, is placed. After the surgical procedure, follow-up visits are scheduled at 4-6 weeks, 3 months (+/- 2 weeks), 6 months (+/- 2 weeks), 12 months (+/- 1 month), and 24 months (+/- 1 month) post-procedure. TephaFLEX sling, manufactured by Tepha, Inc., will be implanted via a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure for treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence. The product is supplied as a sterile, single-use device. One device will be utilized per patient. TephaFLEX sling, developed specifically for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, is a single layer, bioresorbable, mesh made from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament fiber. The mesh is constructed as a 11mm x 60cm tape with an open pore structure, and is enclosed in a polyethylene sleeve to ease insertion. The mesh was designed specifically to provide strength over the three-month critical wound healing period in soft tissue repair and reinforcement, and to encourage the proliferation of healthy tissue at the repair site. The product undergoes a gradual loss of strength after implantation and is essentially resorbed by 18 - 24 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling for SUI

P4HB material ( TephaFlex ™) will be implanted in 25 women with confirmed Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI).

TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling

Intervention Type DEVICE

The sling is made from P4HB material. It is placed in a similar technique to standard retropubic sling procedures, but will resorb over 18-24 months post surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TephaFlex™ mid-urethral sling

The sling is made from P4HB material. It is placed in a similar technique to standard retropubic sling procedures, but will resorb over 18-24 months post surgery.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

P4HB mid-urethral bioresorbable sling

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Be female, = 18 years of age
2. Female symptomatic (moderate or severe) SUI resulting from urethral hypermobility and/or intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).
3. Patients who have planned to undergo surgical correction of symptomatic SUI after consultation with their physician about the risks and benefits of such a procedure, and a determination by the physician that surgical treatment is the most appropriate treatment option for the patient.
4. Understand and be willing to follow all aspects of the study protocol and have signed and dated the EC-approved Informed Consent prior to any study-related procedures being performed

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects who have mixed or urge incontinence
2. Subjects who have stage 2 or more genital prolapse, according to the ICS classification
3. Subjects with previous surgery for SUI
4. Subjects who undergo concomitant surgical procedures
5. Subjects who are pregnant or want to become pregnant in the next 24 months
6. Subjects who are not capable of giving informed consent
7. Subjects with a BMI = 35 kg/m2
8. Subjects diagnosed with a current urinary tract infection or chronic urinary tract infections (defined as 4 or more UTI in the last year)
9. Subjects with known sensitivity to tetracycline or kanamycin
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cape Town

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pelvic Floor Research Foundation of South Africa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan-Paul Roovers, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Pelvic Floor Research Foundation of South Africa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groote Schuur Academic Hospital

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Africa

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Erika M Drewes, MbChB

Role: CONTACT

+27825518440

Stephen T Jeffery, MbChB

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Erika Drewes, MbCHB

Role: primary

+275518440

Stephen Jeffery, MbChB

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

URO001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy/Safety of Midurethral Sling
NCT05255289 RECRUITING NA