Evaluation of Pain and Postoperative Nausea Vomiting Incidence in Outpatient Surgery at IUCT-Oncopole Hospital
NCT ID: NCT03669328
Last Updated: 2018-09-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-06-01
2018-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A first evaluation took place in June 2016 and allowed to identify a category of patients (partial breast surgery with or without axillary gesture) not benefiting from an ideal algological management because justifying in 30% of the cases of a level 3 analgesic remedy in the postoperative recovery room. This use of morphine results in a significant incidence of postoperative nausea and prolonged recovery time before return home harmful to the patient.
With their experience in locoregional anesthesia technique in complete breast surgery (total mastectomy) and aware of the effectiveness of this type of anesthesia on the management of immediate and chronic pain, the investigators have extended their indications of ALR to partial breast surgery in ambulatory.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predictive Factors for Postoperative Pain, Nausea and Vomiting in Oncological Patients
NCT04889534
Implementation Study of the PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting Prediction Rule
NCT00293618
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: to Estimate the Incidence and Risk Factors in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital
NCT02689128
Incidence and Factors Associated With PONV in Regional Anaesthesia
NCT03835234
Reduction of Postoperative Pain, Nausea and Vomiting
NCT01718132
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
On the day of the outpatient surgery, patients receive in the operating room the prevention of PONV according to their level of risk (according to the recommendations of the Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation - SFAR 2008 and Guidelines 2014) and analgesics including a level II and NSAIDs (in the absence of contraindication).
All patients underwent general anaesthesia with sufentanil and propofol. Mechanical ventilation was performed with laryngeal mask. A echoguided regional anesthesia was performed by injection of 20 ml of ropivacaine 3.75 mg/ml above and under the serratus muscle as described by Blanco and al (ref 3)" In the postoperative recovery room, PONV is treated if necessary by an anti-emetic class different from those used in the block. In postoperative pain with EVA\> 3, morphine titration is performed as recommended.
Patients are then monitored in an outpatient surgery unit until they have a home-based return capability assessed by the CHUNG score, including the level of pain (moderate and well relieved), the absence of persistent nausea, and the ability to ambulation.
All outpatient surgery patients are called the day after their return home to ensure the absence of complications according to the regulatory procedure related to outpatient anesthesia.
As part of this evaluation, information on the level of pain at rest and mobility, as well as the frequency of PONV are also recorded and this follow-up is repeated in D2 and D3 after the intervention.
This information is then correlated with the type of anesthesia performed, the surgical procedure as well as the analgesic strategy (ALR) and the antinausea strategy performed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
patients of 2016, June with locoregional anesthesia
locoregional anesthesia
Both groups received locoregional anesthesias
Group 2
patients of 2018, June with locoregional anesthesia
locoregional anesthesia
Both groups received locoregional anesthesias
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
locoregional anesthesia
Both groups received locoregional anesthesias
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients admitted during the period from 01 to 30 June 2016 or during the period from 18 to 5 July 2018
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient refusing to participate in this study
* Minor patients were excluded to ensure the homogeneity of the surveyed population (satisfaction of minors not meeting the same characteristics as that of adults)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Claudius Regaud
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amel Daboussi, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Claudius Regaud
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, Occitanie, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568.
Fuzier R, Puel F, Izard P, Sommet A, Pierre S. Prospective cohort study assessing chronic pain in patients following minor surgery for breast cancer. J Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):246-254. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2288-9. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
Kumar SP. Utilization of brief pain inventory as an assessment tool for pain in patients with cancer: a focused review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 May;17(2):108-15. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.84531.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16HLGENF01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.