Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease
NCT ID: NCT03667703
Last Updated: 2022-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-10
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pediatric Intensive Care Ulcer Prophylaxis Pilot Trial
NCT02929563
Inhaled NO as an Anti-inflammatory and Anti-reperfusion Agent in Infants and Children Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT00585013
A Pharmacokinetic Study of Dexmedetomine in Infants
NCT00459082
Single Dose of Furosemide to Improve Respiratory Distress in Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis
NCT02469597
Community Based Management of Fast Breathing in Infants Aged < 60 Days in Low-income Settlements of Karachi
NCT01533818
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aims \& Hypothesis. The overarching hypothesis of the proposal is withholding SUP from critically ill infants with CHD is safe and results in favorable microbial diversity, thus decreasing hospital-acquired infections. Primary Aim 1 of the study is to assess the feasibility of this pilot randomized, controlled clinical trial of SUP versus placebo in infants admitted to the CICU. The study investigators hypothesize that a priori feasibility measures will be achieved during the study period. Primary Aim 2 of the study is to examine the differences of UGI bleeding in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus those receiving placebo. The study investigators hypothesize that the rate of UGI bleeding will be no different between infants exposed to SUP and to placebo. Secondary Aim 1 of the study is to compare the differences in the abundance of microbial taxa and functional profiles of the aerodigestive tract microbiome between infants receiving SUP and those receiving placebo and before/after the start of SUP. The study investigators hypothesize that there will be significant differences in the abundance of microbial taxa and the functional profiles between the 2 groups - with a more favorable microbial profile present in infants in the placebo group. Secondary Aim 2 is to examine the difference in the incidence of hospital-acquired infections in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus placebo. The study investigators hypothesize the rate of hospital-acquired infections will be higher in patients exposed to SUP when compared to placebo.
Study Design \& Methods. A single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial will be conducted as a feasibility study for a larger multicenter trial. Consecutive infants \< 12 months of age with CHD admitted to the CICU and anticipated to require respiratory support for \> 24 hours will be enrolled and randomized to receive a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) medication or study placebo. Patients will remain in the study until discontinuation of respiratory support, discharge from the CICU or study day 14. Oral, gastric and stool samples will be obtained prior to receiving the first dose of study drug and subsequently at the end of the study. The samples will be analyzed for 16S RNA and metagenomic shotgun sequencing for microbiome composition. Gastric pH will be recorded on all gastric samples. Demographics, nutrition variables, medications, and respiratory data will be collected for all patients while enrolled in the study. An independent Drug Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor patient safety every 6 months and after any significant adverse event.
Outcomes. The primary outcomes will be study feasibility and incidence of clinically significant UGI bleeding. Feasibility will be defined as: 1) \> 80% screening of eligible patients, 2) \> 20% consent rate, 3) \> 80% receive timely first dose of study drug, and 4) \> 80% protocol adherence. Clinically significant UGI bleeding will be defined as new-onset bleeding with subsequent pre-defined physiologic or hemodynamic changes. The secondary outcomes of the study will be observed differences in the aerodigestive microbial diversity between study groups, mortality, length of stay, duration of respiratory support, bleeding events, incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and incidence of hospital-acquired infections (ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, superficial sternal infection or mediastinitis).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Subjects randomized to placebo will receive an equivalent volume (mL) of normal saline intravenously or Ora-plus orally based on weight and age.
Placebo
Patients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug).
Study Drug
Subjects randomized to study drug will receive famotidine, a histamine-2 receptor antagonist. Dosing will be weight based and age-dependent. Infants \< 90 days old will receive either 0.5mg/kg intravenously daily or 0.5mg/kg orally twice a day of famotidine. Infants ≥ 90 days or older will receive 0.25mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours or 0.5mg/kg orally twice a day.
Famotidine
Patients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Famotidine
Patients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug).
Placebo
Patients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. diagnosed with congenital heart disease (including anatomic, myopathic and arrhythmic conditions),
3. received ≤ 1 dose of SUP (including histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and sucralfate) during current admission, AND
4. anticipated to require respiratory support for \> 24 hours during their CICU stay. Respiratory support includes mechanical ventilation, non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy.
Exclusion Criteria
2. active gastrointestinal bleeding,
3. active Helicobacter pylori infection,
4. administration of high-dose steroids (equivalent dosing to 15 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone),
5. will receive ketorolac (intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) during admission,
6. exposed to specific anticoagulants (high-dose aspirin, direct thrombin inhibitors and GPIIbIIIa inhibitors),
7. planned to undergo or recently has undergone gastrointestinal surgery (i.e. repair of duodenal atresia)
8. supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) or ventricular assist device (VAD),
9. currently enrolled in another intervention trial,
10. known to be allergic to H2RAs,
11. admitted for palliative care,
12. prior enrollment in the study, OR
13. primary provider declines enrollment.
1 Minute
12 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Gerber Foundation
OTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kimberly I. Mills, MD
Assistant in Cardiology, Instructor in Pediatrics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kimberly I Mills, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Ben D Albert, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Nilesh M Mehta, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mills KI, Albert BD, Bechard LJ, Chu S, Duggan CP, Kaza A, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Sleeper LA, Newburger JW, Priebe GP, Mehta NM. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo-A Blinded Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Two Strategies in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;25(2):118-127. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003384. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
Mills KI, Albert BD, Bechard LJ, Duggan CP, Kaza A, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Vlamakis H, Sleeper LA, Newburger JW, Priebe GP, Mehta NM. Stress ulcer prophylaxis versus placebo-a blinded randomized control trial to evaluate the safety of two strategies in critically ill infants with congenital heart disease (SUPPRESS-CHD). Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04513-w.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-P00028715
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.