Postoperative Residual Curarization in 2018

NCT ID: NCT03665805

Last Updated: 2018-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

587 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-30

Study Completion Date

2018-11-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of postoperative residual curarization, as defined by a train-of-four \<90%, upon postanaesthesia care unit arrival. Anesthetists tend to use train-of-four monitoring in the operating theatre to interpret muscle tone. Train-of-four monitoring is a widely used term for the peripheral nerve stimulation used in neuromuscular blockade monitoring. Hypothesizing a change in our practice since 2006-2012 (Cammu G, Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 426-9 and Cammu G, Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 999-1006), residual neuromuscular block as well as the use of intraoperative neuromuscular transmission monitoring and reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents will again be prospectively evaluated in 2018. The present study aims to compare these three periods (2006-2012-2018) in terms of management of neuromuscular block in the operating room and to look for a relationship with the incidence of postoperative residual curarization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Residual Curarization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

neuromuscular transmission monitoring

The acceleromyographic responses of the adductor pollicis muscle as percent of the train-of-four (TOF%) on stimulation of the ulnar nerve by means of the TOFscan neuromuscular transmission monitor (iDMed, Marseille, France).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older;
* Informed consent signed;
* Admission for elective surgery;
* Administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents during surgery;
* Tracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of renal, hepatic, metabolic, and/or neuromuscular disorders
* Ejection fraction \<20%
* Admission for emergency surgery; or cardiothoracic surgery
* Reoperation during the same hospital admission
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Guy CAMMU

Staff Anesthesiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

OLV Hospital

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cammu G, De Witte J, De Veylder J, Byttebier G, Vandeput D, Foubert L, Vandenbroucke G, Deloof T. Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):426-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195543.61123.1f.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16428537 (View on PubMed)

Cammu GV, Smet V, De Jongh K, Vandeput D. A prospective, observational study comparing postoperative residual curarisation and early adverse respiratory events in patients reversed with neostigmine or sugammadex or after apparent spontaneous recovery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Nov;40(6):999-1006. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000611.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23194209 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LKGC2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.