Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
112 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-11-05
2021-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-Crossover Study of the LMA Protector Versus Ambu AuraGain
NCT02820792
Comparison of Lma-Protector With Endotracheal Tube: Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanical Parameters During Controlled Ventilation & Possibility of Pulmonary Aspiration
NCT06474559
A Study Comparing the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme With the Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector In the Ambulatory Surgery Unit
NCT03462550
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
NCT03118596
Protector™ Versus Supreme® Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT03214497
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is, however, a professional duty to know that a device conforms to established norms for use. These norms are not official standards but rather, reference data against which a device can be clinically judged. Therefore, a device that is easy to insert but has a low 'leak pressure' (see above) is different from one that is more difficult to insert but as a high leak pressure. It is not that one is 'better' than the other, but rather that the data help create a 'usability profile' of the device which can be useful when making a clinical selection for the device.
Preoperative assessment:
During the preoperative visit, patient information leaflet will be given to the patients meeting the eligibility criteria.
Wherever possible, suitable patients will be identified in the preoperative assessment clinic and the information leaflet given. The patients will be given adequate time to read this information and any queries will be answered before being asked to sign a consent form. A detailed airway assessment will be performed by one of the investigators and documented on the study proforma.
Induction of anaesthesia:
On arrival in the anaesthetic room patients will be monitored with pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and invasive or non-invasive blood pressure measurements. After intravenous access is secured and the pre-surgical checklist completed, all patients will be pre-oxygenated using a facemask to achieve end tidal oxygen concentration of at least 80%. A 'sniffing' position of the head and neck and a 20 degree head-up bed tilt will be used for pre-oxygenation. General anaesthesia will be induced intravenously. After induction of anaesthesia, facemask ventilation will be commenced and anaesthesia maintained with an inhalational anaesthetic agent in oxygen or with total intravenous anaesthesia. The volatile agent's (anesthetic gases) concentration of 1 MAC adjusted for the patient's age will be achieved and maintained. This is normal process of anaesthesia applicable for all patients irrespective of participation in the study.
Supraglottic airway device (SAD) insertion:
Once deep plane of anaesthesia is confirmed, with the absence of movement to jaw thrust stimulation the SAD (LMA protector) will be inserted. The size of the device will be based on the manufacturer's recommendations for the body weight. The breathing system will be connected to the device. Ventilation of the lungs will be then confirmed by observing adequate bilateral chest inflation and square end-tidal capnogram wave with positive pressure ventilation. Adequate ventilation will be recorded if three tests are passed: 1) adequate chest movement, 2) an expired tidal volume of at least 7 ml/kg and 3) stable oxygenation. Time would continue until LMA® ProtectorTM inserted successfully. If it is not possible to insert the device or ventilate through it, two more attempts at placement of the device will be allowed. If placement has failed after two further attempts, the study will be abandoned and the other device will be used. If this fails on first attempt a different LMA or tracheal tube will be used as appropriate.
Maintenance of anaesthesia and recovery
The main interventions refer to the insertion of the airway device into the patient to obtain a airway and allow the conduct of the anaesthetic and therefore the surgery. However, if there are problems with the device and the airway obtained is suboptimal then the below interventions are allowed (which will be noted in the data collection form):
1. Neck extension - move patient's neck upward
2. Neck flexion - move patient's neck downward
3. Chin lift - manoeuvre to open the airway
4. Jaw thrust - manoeuvre to open the airway
5. Reposition of the device At the end of operation, anaesthetic agents will be discontinued while the device is left in place. The device will be removed after the patient has regained consciousness, and has responded to verbal command to open the mouth. Any complications that occur during the use of the device will be recorded.
Postoperative assessment Postoperatively in recovery or on the ward, the investigators will visit each patient and determine whether the following airway complications are present after surgery: sore throat (constant pain, independent of swallowing), dysphagia (difficulty in, or pain provoked by, swallowing), sore jaw, dysphonia (difficulty in, or pain on, speaking), numbness of the tongue or the oropharynx, ear pain, neck or mouth ache, hearing changes. Each complication will be graded as none, mild, moderate or severe. The same questions will be asked 24-48 hours later.
First visit During the first visit by the anaesthetist to the participant, at the anaesthetist's earliest opportunity, either in the recovery area or on the ward, the participants will be asked about the following complications, which will be graded as none, mild, moderate or severe.
1. Vomiting
2. Lip or tongue swelling
3. Hearing changes
4. Ear pain
5. Sore throat
6. Pain on swallowing
7. Jaw pain
8. Neck or mouth ache
9. Pain on speaking
10. Numbness of the tongue
Second visit (or telephone consultation) During the second visit 24-48 hours post-operatively on the ward or via telephone the participants will be asked about the following complications, which will be graded as none, mild, moderate or severe.
1. Vomiting
2. Lip or tongue swelling
3. Hearing changes
4. Ear pain
5. Sore throat
6. Pain on swallowing
7. Jaw pain
8. Neck or mouth ache
9. Pain on speaking
10. Numbness of the tongue
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LMA Protector
The LMA Protector will be used
LMA Protector
The LMA Protector will be inserted when a supraglottic device is needed
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LMA Protector
The LMA Protector will be inserted when a supraglottic device is needed
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
* Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
* ASA 1 - 3 category patients
* Elective operations
* Urgent operations
* Patients suitable for an SAD based on patient and operation factors.
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal of consent
* Age less than 18 years
* Require intubation for the operation
* Risk of regurgitation
* ASA 4 and above
* Mouth opening less than 2.5cm Require awake intubation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust
OTHER
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
OTHER
University Hospital of Wales
OTHER
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vassilis Athanassoglou
Primary Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vassilis Athanassoglou
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal United Hospital
Bath, , United Kingdom
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Nothampton General Hospital
Northampton, , United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Royal Berkshire Hospital
Reading, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1338
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.