Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy vs. Microwave Ablation for Colorectal Cancer Patients With Metastatic Disease in the Liver

NCT ID: NCT03654131

Last Updated: 2026-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-25

Study Completion Date

2029-12-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized phase II trial between microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) - two standard treatment modalities for colorectal patients with metastatic disease in the liver. Primary endpoint is freedom form local lesion progression.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer patients with 1-3 liver metastases (diameter ≤4.0 cm) found unsuitable for resection are randomized 1:1 to either MWA or SBRT. Chemotherapy is allowed. Curative treatment of extrahepatic disease must be initiated in patients with lung metastases and/or primary tumors. Patients will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

SBRT for oligometastases in the liver from colorectal cancer patients. Standard considered MWA.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MWA

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided MWA or open surgery MWA. The patient is fully anesthetized during the treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MWA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization

SBRT

3 fractions of 15 Gy (in total 45 Gy), 3 fractions per week. The dose is prescribed to the PTV encompassing 67% isodose. The SBRT plan is normalized such that the mean dose to the GTV is 100% = 67.5 Gy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SBRT

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MWA

Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization

Intervention Type DEVICE

SBRT

Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Colorectal cancer patients with oligo metastatic disease in the liver (1 to 3 tumors), and where metastases are found unsuitable for resection because of

1. non-resectability
2. small metastasis localized deep in the liver, where a parenchyma sparing intervention is preferred over an extensive resection
3. previous extensive liver surgery
4. comorbidity
2. The multidisciplinary team should all agree that both percutaneous or open surgical MW-ablation and SBRT are safe as first treatment choice for the individual patient.
3. Tumor sizes ≤4.0 cm
4. Age \> 18 years
5. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous radiotherapy to the liver
2. Liver volume \< 700 ml
3. Another active cancer disease within the past 36 months
4. Not able to understand written or oral protocol information
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Signe Lenora Risumlund

Senior consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Righospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-18000085

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.