Alpha 2 Agonists for Sedation to Produce Better Outcomes From Critical Illness (A2B Trial)

NCT ID: NCT03653832

Last Updated: 2024-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1437 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-10

Study Completion Date

2024-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many patients in intensive care (ICU) need help to breathe on a breathing machine and need pain killers and sedatives to keep them comfortable and pain free. However, keeping patients too deeply sedated can make their ICU stay longer, can cause ICU confusion (delirium) and afterwards may cause distressing memories. Ideally patients should be kept less sedated, but it is difficult to get the balance of sedation and comfort right.

The investigators want to know whether starting an alpha2-agonist drug early in ICU can help keep patients more lightly sedated but still comfortable, and whether patients spend less time on the ventilator. The investigators also want to know how safe they are and if they can improve important outcomes during ICU stay and during recovery. The investigators also want to know if they are value for money.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Many patients in intensive care (ICU) need help to breathe on a breathing machine and need pain killers and sedatives to keep them comfortable and pain free. However, keeping patients too deeply sedated can make their ICU stay longer, can cause ICU confusion (delirium), and afterwards may cause distressing memories. Ideally, the investigators want to keep patients less sedated, but it is difficult to get the balance of sedation and comfort right.

For sedation, most ICUs use a drug called 'propofol' that is good at reducing anxiety and making people sleepy, but is not a pain killer, so additional pain killers are needed. There are two other drugs used less often called 'alpha-2 agonists' that have both sedative and pain-killing actions, which may make it easier for patients to be more awake and comfortable on the ventilator. The two drugs are called clonidine and dexmedetomidine.

The investigators want to know whether starting an alpha2-agonist drug early in ICU, and using this instead of propofol as much as possible, can help keep patients more lightly sedated but still comfortable, and whether patients spend less time on the ventilator with these drugs. The investigators also want to know how safe these drugs are and if improve important outcomes during ICU stay can be improved (like delirium, comfort, and safety) and during recovery (like bad memories, anxiety, and depression). The investigators also want to know if they are value for money.

The trial will include 1437 participants needing to be on a ventilator for at least 2 days. Participants will be allocated to one of three groups by chance. One group will continue to receive propofol; one group will receive dexmedetomidine; and one group will receive clonidine. All participants will receive extra pain relief if needed, and participants in the dexmedetomidine and clonidine groups will continue to receive propofol if they need this in addition. Nurses and doctors will alter the doses of sedation drugs to try and reduce or stop them, but always aiming to have participants lightly sedated and comfortable. The trial will compare if participants on dexmedetomidine or clonidine come off the ventilator quicker than those just on propofol. The trial will examine whether there was a difference between the groups in the number of participants who experienced delirium in ICU, compare how comfortable participants were, and measure if participants memories of being in the ICU differed.

Patients who were in the trial will be followed up for up to 180 days afterwards because the investigators want to compare if there were differences in the after-effects of being ill in ICU between the groups. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires that will assess their memories of the ICU experience at 90 days after entering the trial. At 180 days, participants will be asked to complete questionnaires so that the investigators can detect how patients feel about their quality of life or if they suffer from anxiety, depression or stress. Note that for patients recruited during the final months of recruitment, the 90 and 180 days follow will be truncated and not collected. This was agreed with the TSC and funder to reduce trial costs and enable trial completion.

Alongside this trial, investigators will be looking at value for money, which is important because clonidine, dexmedetomidine, and propofol costs are quite different. Clonidine, in particular, is relatively inexpensive. ICU nurses' and doctors' views on how easy or difficult it was to adjust and use the drugs will be obtained. This will give valuable practical information that can be shared with other ICUs, particularly if alpha2-agonists are found to be better and other ICUs want to start using them.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomised, parallel-group, allocation concealed, controlled, open, phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost- effectiveness trial with internal pilot
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexmedetomidine Group

For dexmedetomidine, the regimen will follow the manufacturer's guidance and regimens used in previous trials. Dexmedetomidine will be up and down titrated against sedation targets set by clinical staff and reviewed at regular intervals, and documented at least daily. No loading dose will be administered. The starting dose will be 0.7 µg.kg-1.hour-1 titrated to a maximum dose 1.4 µg.kg-1 hour-1. Lower starting doses will be used at clinical discretion for patients with cardiovascular instability.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will commence intravenous infusion of open-label study drug according to a weight-based dose regimen as early as possible post-randomisation, and within a maximum of two hours.

Bedside clinical staff will transition patients to achieve sedation with the allocated α2-agonist agent as quickly as clinically feasible and safe, to replicate the way these drugs would be used in routine practice. Additional opiate will be used for analgesia using clinical judgement. Once established, additional propofol will only be used when the maximum α2-agonist dose is reached or because cardiovascular or other side-effects limit dose escalation.

Clonidine Group

For clonidine, the regimen is designed to be equipotent with dexmedetomidine based on known pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The chosen regimen is similar to that currently used in many UK ICUs as part of routine 'off label' practice. Clonidine will be up and down titrated against sedation targets set by clinical staff and reviewed at regular intervals, and at least daily. No loading dose will be administered. The starting dose will be 1.0µg.kg-1.hour-1 titrated to a maximum dose of 2 µg.kg-1.hour-1. Lower starting doses will be used at clinical discretion for patients with cardiovascular instability.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clonidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will commence intravenous infusion of open-label study drug according to a weight-based dose regimen as early as possible post-randomisation, and within a maximum of two hours.

Bedside clinical staff will transition patients to achieve sedation with the allocated α2-agonist agent as quickly as clinically feasible and safe, to replicate the way these drugs would be used in routine practice. Additional opiate will be used for analgesia using clinical judgement. Once established, additional propofol will only be used when the maximum α2-agonist dose is reached or because cardiovascular or other side-effects limit dose escalation.

Usual Care (Propofol) Group

Usual Care Group : Patients will continue to receive intravenous propofol according to usual current care . The sedation targets, weaning, and sedation discontinuation procedures will follow the same clinical targets as for the clonidine and dexmedetomidine groups.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will continue to receive intravenous propofol according to current usual care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

Patients will commence intravenous infusion of open-label study drug according to a weight-based dose regimen as early as possible post-randomisation, and within a maximum of two hours.

Bedside clinical staff will transition patients to achieve sedation with the allocated α2-agonist agent as quickly as clinically feasible and safe, to replicate the way these drugs would be used in routine practice. Additional opiate will be used for analgesia using clinical judgement. Once established, additional propofol will only be used when the maximum α2-agonist dose is reached or because cardiovascular or other side-effects limit dose escalation.

Intervention Type DRUG

Clonidine

Patients will commence intravenous infusion of open-label study drug according to a weight-based dose regimen as early as possible post-randomisation, and within a maximum of two hours.

Bedside clinical staff will transition patients to achieve sedation with the allocated α2-agonist agent as quickly as clinically feasible and safe, to replicate the way these drugs would be used in routine practice. Additional opiate will be used for analgesia using clinical judgement. Once established, additional propofol will only be used when the maximum α2-agonist dose is reached or because cardiovascular or other side-effects limit dose escalation.

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Patients will continue to receive intravenous propofol according to current usual care.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dexdor Catapres Diprivan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) in an ICU
2. Aged 18 or over
3. Within 48 hours of first episode of mechanical ventilation in ICU
4. Requiring sedation with propofol
5. Expected to require a total of 48 hours of MV or more in ICU
6. Expected to require a further 24 hours of MV or more at the time of randomisation in the opinion of the responsible clinician

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute brain injury (traumatic brain injury; intracranial haemorrhage; ischaemic brain injury from stroke or hypoperfusion)
2. Post-cardiac arrest (where there is clinical concern about hypoxic brain injury)
3. Status epilepticus
4. Continuous therapeutic neuromuscular paralysis at the time of screening or randomisation
5. Guillain-Barre Syndrome
6. Myasthenia gravis
7. Home ventilation
8. Fulminant hepatic failure
9. Patient not expected to survive 24 hours by responsible clinician
10. Decision to provide only palliative or end-of-life care
11. Pregnancy
12. Known allergy to one of the study drugs
13. Untreated second or third degree heart block
14. Transferred from another Intensive Care Unit in which MV occurred for \>6 hours
15. Prisoners
16. Enrolled on another CTIMP
17. Previously enrolled on the A2B Trial
18. Patient known to have experienced a period with heart rate \<50 beats per minute for 60 minutes or longer since commencing mechanical ventilation in the ICU
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queen's University, Belfast

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Queensland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital of Wales

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Edinburgh Napier University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Warwick

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

NHS Lothian

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Cambridge

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Edinburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Timothy Walsh, MBChB MD MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Edinburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Belfast Health & Social Care Trust

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

South Eastern Health and Social Trust

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Blackpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Bristol NHS Trust

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Chester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust

Dudley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

NHS Dumfries and Galloway

Dumfries, , United Kingdom

Site Status

NHS Lothian

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Medway NHS Foundation Trust

Gillingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Harrogate and District NHS Trust

Harrogate, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wye Valley NHS Trust

Hereford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Kings Lynn NHS Foundation Trust

Kings Lynn, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals of Leicester

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

Lewisham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Aintree University Hospital Foundation Trust

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester University Foundation Trust

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Newcastle, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Aneurin Bevan University Health Board

Newport, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Poole Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Poole, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital Southampton NHSFT

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust

Stockton-on-Tees, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust

Taunton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Watford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Walsh TS, Parker RA, Aitken LM, McKenzie CA, Emerson L, Boyd J, Macdonald A, Beveridge G, Giddings A, Hope D, Irvine S, Tuck S, Lone NI, Kydonaki K, Norrie J, Brealey D, Antcliffe D, Reay M, Williams A, Bewley J, Creagh-Brown B, McAuley DF, Dark P, Wise MP, Gordon AC, Perkins GD, Reade MC, Blackwood B, MacLullich A, Glen R, Page VJ, Weir CJ; A2B Trial Investigators. Dexmedetomidine- or Clonidine-Based Sedation Compared With Propofol in Critically Ill Patients: The A2B Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Jul 1;334(1):32-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.7200.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40388916 (View on PubMed)

Aitken LM, Emerson LM, Kydonaki K, Blackwood B, Creagh-Brown B, Lone NI, McKenzie CA, Reade MC, Weir CJ, Wise MP, Walsh TS. Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B trial): protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e081637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081637.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38580355 (View on PubMed)

Walsh TS, Aitken LM, McKenzie CA, Boyd J, Macdonald A, Giddings A, Hope D, Norrie J, Weir C, Parker RA, Lone NI, Emerson L, Kydonaki K, Creagh-Brown B, Morris S, McAuley DF, Dark P, Wise MP, Gordon AC, Perkins G, Reade M, Blackwood B, MacLullich A, Glen R, Page VJ. Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the UK. BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e078645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078645.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38072483 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HTA 16/93/01

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2018-001650-98

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

243640

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

18/SS/0085

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AC18022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexmedetomidine for Continuous Sedation
NCT00226785 TERMINATED PHASE3