Effects of Pneumatic Vitreolysis on Vitreomacular Traction
NCT ID: NCT03647267
Last Updated: 2022-09-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-16
2020-08-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Pneumatic Vitreolysis on Macular Hole
NCT03677869
Pneumovitreolysis for Vitreomacular Traction
NCT03945695
Effects of Macular Buckle Versus Vitrectomy on Macular Hole and Macular Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes
NCT03433547
Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy With Gas for Retinal Detachment Due to Myopic Macular Hole
NCT00485199
Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment in Patients With Extended Criteria
NCT02871531
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives
Primary
1. To compare the proportion of eyes with central VMT release on OCT after pneumatic vitreolysis with gas injection versus observation (sham injection) in eyes with VMT without an associated macular hole.
Secondary
2. To evaluate visual function outcomes at 24 weeks after gas injection is performed compared with sham injection.
Study Design: Multi-center, randomized clinical trial
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pneumatic Vitreolysis
Participants randomized to the Pneumatic Vitreolysis arm will receive 0.3-mL intraocular injection of C3F8 gas.
Pneumatic Vitreolysis (C3F8 injection)
Pneumatic Vitreolysis will be performed via an intraocular injection of C3F8 gas. Perfluoropropane (C3F8) is an inert gas under pressure and is administered by injection into the vitreous cavity. It was approved by the FDA in February 1993 (P900066) for the use of placing pressure on detached retina.
Observation
Participants randomized to the observation group will receive a sham injection.
Observation
No intervention; sham injection only
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pneumatic Vitreolysis (C3F8 injection)
Pneumatic Vitreolysis will be performed via an intraocular injection of C3F8 gas. Perfluoropropane (C3F8) is an inert gas under pressure and is administered by injection into the vitreous cavity. It was approved by the FDA in February 1993 (P900066) for the use of placing pressure on detached retina.
Observation
No intervention; sham injection only
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
3. Able and willing to avoid high altitude travel, including airline travel, until gas resolution (approximately 6 to 8 weeks).
4. For phakic patients, able and willing to avoid supine position until gas resolution (approximately 6 to 8 weeks).
5. Able and willing to wear wristband that informs any medical personnel that the patient has a gas bubble in the eye
Exclusion
A participant can have only one study eye. If both eyes are eligible at the time of randomization, the study eye will be selected by the investigator and participant before randomization.
The eligibility criteria for a study eye are as follows:
Inclusion
1. Vitreomacular adhesion on OCT that is no larger than 3000 microns with visible separation of the vitreous on either side as seen on horizontal and vertical scans, confirmed by central reading center Note: presence of epiretinal membrane is neither a requirement nor exclusion.
2. Decreased visual function (e.g. metamorphopsia or other visual symptom) that is attributed to VMT.
Examples of visual symptoms include:
a) Distortion and/or reduction in visual acuity b) Recognized difficulty with reading, driving, or using a computer c) Patient recognized interference with quality of life because of a and/or b.
c. Visual acuity letter score of at least 19 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/400 or better) and at most 78 (20/32 or worse) d. Investigator and participant willing to wait 6 months before surgical intervention, provided visual acuity remains stable
• An eye that requires prompt treatment for VMT should not be enrolled
Exclusion e. Other ocular condition that might affect visual acuity during the course of the study or require intraocular treatment (e.g., retinal vein occlusion, substantial age-related macular degeneration, or macular edema induced by a condition other than VMT) • If diabetic retinopathy is present, severity level must be microaneurysms only or better (≤ diabetic retinopathy severity level 20)
• Presence of drusen is acceptable; however, eyes with geographic atrophy or neovascular age-related macular degeneration involving the macula are excluded f. High level of myopia (spherical equivalent of -8.00 diopters or more myopic if phakic or retinal abnormalities consistent with pathologic myopia if phakic or pseudophakic) g. History of prior gas injection, ocriplasmin injection, or intraocular injection for any reason h. History of prior vitrectomy i. History of uncontrolled glaucoma
• IOP must be \<30 mmHg, with no more than one topical glaucoma medication, and no documented glaucomatous field loss for the eye to be eligible j. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or major ocular surgery anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization k. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 4 months prior to randomization l. Aphakia or anterior chamber intraocular lens m. Exam evidence of severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis n. Uveitis o. Presence of any macular hole or lamellar hole (according to reading center grading) p. Retinal history or pathology that might predispose an eye to an increased risk of retinal detachment from the procedure
• Untreated retinal tears, not retinal holes, are an exclusion. It is up to the investigator to determine whether extent of lattice degeneration or other pathology might increase the risk of retinal detachment.
q. Any contraindication to paracentesis (e.g., history of narrow angle glaucoma) r. Lenticular or zonular instability
Exclusion Criteria
7. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involves treatment with any drug or device that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied at the time of study entry
• Note: study participants should not receive another investigational drug/device while participating in the study
8. Known contraindication to any component of the treatment
9. Known allergy to any drug used in the procedure prep (including povidone iodine)
10. Potential participant is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the next 6 months following randomization
11. Anticipated surgery requiring anesthesia within the next 6 months following randomization
• Participants cannot receive nitrous oxide until gas resolution
12. For women of child-bearing potential, pregnant at the time of enrollment
• Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgement may be used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
Study Eye Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clement Chan, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Retinal Diagnostic Center
Campbell, California, United States
Atlantis Eye Care
Huntington Beach, California, United States
Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates
Mountain View, California, United States
East Bay Retina Consultants, Inc
Oakland, California, United States
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
Palm Desert, California, United States
National Ophthalmic Research Institute
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
University of Florida College of Med., Dept of Ophthalmology, Jacksonville Hlth Sci Ctr
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Florida Retina Consultants
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Florida Retina Institute
Orlando, Florida, United States
Southeast Eye Institute, PA dba Eye Associates of Pinellas
Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
Sarasota Retina Institute
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Southeast Retina Center, PC
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Thomas Eye Group
Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States
Gailey Eye Clinic
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Illinois Retina Associates, S.C.
Oak Park, Illinois, United States
Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Wolfe Eye Clinic
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Mid-America Retina Consultants, P.A.
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Paducah Retinal Center
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Eye Associates of Northeast Louisiana dba Haik Humble Eye Center
West Monroe, Louisiana, United States
Elman Retina Group, PA
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Valley Eye Physicians and Surgeons
Ayer, Massachusetts, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Vitreo-Retinal Associates, PC
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Retina Specialists of Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic Department of Opthalmology
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
The Retina Institute
St Louis, Missouri, United States
MaculaCare
New York, New York, United States
Western Carolina Clinical Research, LLC
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Assoc., PA
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc
Beachwood, Ohio, United States
Retina Vitreous Center
Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Retina, LLP
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Retina Northwest, PC
Portland, Oregon, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Austin Retina Associates
Austin, Texas, United States
Retina Research Center
Austin, Texas, United States
Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Spokane Eye Clinic
Spokane, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.