Decision Aids Upper and Lower Extremity

NCT ID: NCT03643978

Last Updated: 2019-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

168 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-01

Study Completion Date

2019-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess differences in choice of treatment (and the rationale behind it), physical function, pain intensity, satisfaction, and decision regret between orthopedic patients who review a decision aid during their visit and those that do not. Decision aids for 23 different conditions are included.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients visiting an orthopeadic surgeon in one of our 4 affiliated offices in a large urban area in the United States are invited to participate over a 4 month period. All English-speaking patients, between 18 and 89 years old, visiting an orthopeadic surgeon with a new problem, for which either invasive or non-invasive treatment is possible and a DA is available are asked to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria are non-English speakers or a clear preference for a treatment option by surgeon or patient. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group in a 1:1 ratio using an Excel random number generator. Patients in the intervention group go over the DA during the visit, once the surgeon has identified the diagnosis. After the diagnosis is set, the surgeon steps out of the visit and steps back in when the patients has reviewed the DA. The surgeon and the patient go over the treatment options and a decision will be made. After the visit, all patients, both in the intervention and control group, are asked to fill out a survey. Two weeks after enrollment a research assistant calls all patients for a follow up questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Extremity Dysfunction Lower Extremity Problem

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized in an intervention group that reviews a decision aid and a control group that does not.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Decision Aid Group

These patients review a decision aid.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decision aid

Intervention Type OTHER

The decision aids aim to inform the patients about the diagnosis and the treatment options. They aim to help the patient prioritize and make an informed decision.

Control Group

These patients do not review a decision aid.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decision aid

The decision aids aim to inform the patients about the diagnosis and the treatment options. They aim to help the patient prioritize and make an informed decision.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

English-speaking, adult patients seeing an upper or lower extremity surgeon for a new visit regarding diagnoses that can be treated invasively and non-invasively:

Shoulder

* Clavicle fracture in the middle
* Clavicle fracture close to the shoulder
* Proximal humerus fracture
* Humerus shaft fracture
* Distal humerus fracture

Elbow

* Lateral epicondylitis
* Ruptured biceps at the elbow
* Olecranon fracture
* Radial head fracture
* Olecranon bursitis

Hand/wrist

* Distal radius fracture
* Carpal tunnel syndrome
* Scaphoid fracture
* Thumb arthrosis
* Trigger finger
* Mallet fracture
* de Quervain tendinopathy
* Wrist ganglion
* Dupuytren

Knee • Knee arthritis: cortisone injection

Hip

• Hip arthritis: total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

* Obvious indication for one treatment approach, either from the surgeon or the patient perspective.
* Patients who do not want to be contacted for follow-up.
* Non-English speaking patients, because the decision aids used in this study are not currently validated to non-English language.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Ring

Associate Dean for Comprehensive Care and Professor, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Austin Regional Clinic

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Orthopedics

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

HTB Musculoskeletal Institute

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seton Institute for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Specialists of Austin

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

ATX Ortho

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-07-0027

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BFR After Bicep Tenodesis
NCT03437239 UNKNOWN NA
Early Weight Bearing in Distal Femur Fractures
NCT06806839 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA