aICP Measurement in Patients With Cerebral Artery Infarction / aICP MCA Infarction
NCT ID: NCT03641963
Last Updated: 2020-02-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, there are still important questions about the individual indication for decompressive surgery. In consideration of a variable clinical course (some patients develop fatal brain edema early, whereas other patients do not show severe brain swelling for several days), achieving a way to measure, control and predict malignant brain edema formation would be of extremely important value.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-invasive Absolute Intracranial Pressure Measurement in Patients With Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction for Determination of Timing to Descompressive Craniectomy.
NCT03221959
Investigation of a New Window Into Intracranial Pressure: Venous Occlusion Pressure of the Isolated Periorbital Vein
NCT07053631
Security and Effectiveness Assessment of Locking Systems in Ventriculostomy for Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT06772155
TCD Detection of Ophthalmic Artery Blood Flow Velocity Prediction Feasibility Study of Intracranial Pressure
NCT02240394
Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring to Improve Emergency Care in Brazil's Public Health System
NCT07210333
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Actually, M-MCA infarctions constitute between 1% to 10% of all supratentorial ischemic strokes, with a yearly incidence about 10-20/100.000 people. The etiology of malignant MCA infarctions is mostly due to thrombosis or embolic occlusion of either the internal carotid artery or the proximal MCA. The term M-MCA is referred to a severe MCA syndrome with typical clinical symptoms (hemiparesis to hemiplegia, severe sensory deficits, head and eye deviation, hemi-inattention, and, if the dominant hemisphere is involved, global aphasia), following a uniform clinical course (progressive deterioration of conscious within the first 24-48 h), and ending in herniation. An early diagnosis is essential and depends on CT (Computed Tomography) and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) to aid the prediction of a malignant course, but, until today there is no clear consensus to define and predict radiologically a malignant evolution in early phases.
Several pharmacological strategies have been proposed but the efficacy of these approaches has not been supported by adequate evidence from clinical trials and, until recently, treatment of malignant MCA infarctions has been a major unmet need.
Over the past 10 years, results from randomised controlled trials (RCT) (HAMLET, DECIMAL and DESTINY) and their pooled analyses have provided evidence that an early hemicraniectomy leads to a substantial decrease in mortality at 6 and 12 months and is likely to improve functional outcome. However, there are still important questions about the individual indication for decompressive surgery. In consideration of a variable clinical course (some patients develop fatal brain edema early, whereas other patients do not show severe brain swelling for several days), achieving a way to measure, control and predict malignant brain edema formation would be of extremely important value.
In this way, the ICP measuring could represent an objective value to determine in every patient the time point to indicate decompressive craniectomy surgery, and also could allow us to find a correlation between the size of the infarction and periinfarction edema. Therefore the optimal timing of surgical intervention can be defined and all the medical treatment adjusted.
Currently, ICP can be measured and registered only using invasive techniques. The two ICP measurement methods available - intraventricular and intraparenchymal - require both a neurosurgical procedure, in order to implant the catheter and probes within the brain. Thus, these measures include themselves a risk for the subject, and both infections and intracranial bleedings are regular albeit not frequent complications. In addition, invasive recording of ICP requires neurosurgical expertise and intensive care unit (ICU) facilities. Therefore ICP measurement so far, is not a standard of care in stroke units.
A reliable, accurate and precise non-invasive method to measure ICP would be of considerable clinical value, enabling ICP measurement without neurosurgical expertise and ICU facilities. Moreover, it would save the patients from the complication risks associated with invasive measures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stroke patients with ICP measurement
All patients with the possibility to evolve a malignant MCA infarct according to the initial assessment, will be included in our study, to measure ICP non-invasive. The ICP will be measured non-invasive with the Vittamed 205 Non-invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) meter.
Vittamed 205 Non-invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) meter
Non-Invasive intracranial pressure measurement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vittamed 205 Non-invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) meter
Non-Invasive intracranial pressure measurement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age: ≥ 18 years at admission
* Informed consent of the patient or consent of patient's next of kin (plus consent of an independent physician)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with any known ocular condition that may be worsened by sustained eye pressure.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kantonsspital Aarau
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Javier Fandino, MD
Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Javier Fandino
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kantonsspital Aarau
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kantonsspital Aarau AG
Aarau, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
aICP Stroke
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.