Impact of a Classroom-based Sensitization Intervention on Demand for Mental Health Care Among Adolescents in India

NCT ID: NCT03633916

Last Updated: 2019-07-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

835 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-20

Study Completion Date

2018-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this embedded stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the impact of a classroom sensitization (intervention condition), over and above the school-level sensitization activities (control condition), on referrals to a host trial (examining the effectiveness of a problem-solving intervention delivered by lay counsellors). The primary hypothesis is that the classroom-level sensitization intervention will be associated with a higher overall referral rate into the host trial (i.e. the proportion of adolescents referred as a function of the total sampling frame in each condition). The secondary hypotheses are that, compared with the control condition, the intervention condition will be associated with a greater proportion of referred students who meet eligibility criteria for inclusion in the host trial and a greater proportion of students who self-refer. We will also explore whether there are any differences between conditions in terms of the severity of total symptoms and symptom subtypes presented by referred adolescents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and rationale:

Schools are recommended as strategically important platform for improving young people's access to mental health care, including in low and middle- income countries (Patton et al., 2016). Along with a limited supply of effective treatments, low awareness about mental health problems and their treatment often act as barriers to help seeking in schools. Interventions to increase mental health literacy have been shown to increase the demand for mental health care among young people in a number of studies conducted worldwide, including in low-resource settings. However, the evidence is not conclusive as many of the existing studies are associated with a high risk of bias (Wei et al., 2013; Wei et al., 2015; Kutcher et al., 2016).

Formative research in Government-run secondary schools in New Delhi, India indicated that mental health services were non-existent and adolescents had limited knowledge about mental health care. The investigators have therefore developed sensitization activities to promote referral to, and uptake of, a newly developed school counselling service. These sensitization activities have been designed for implementation at both whole school and classroom-levels, and are intended to be delivered by non-specialist counsellors. The additional resource investment in classroom-level sensitization activities may be justified if this component leads to significantly greater levels of demand. This trial therefore seeks to evaluate the additional impact of the classroom sensitization session on demand for school counselling in New Delhi.

This study is part of a larger research program called PRIDE (PRemIum for aDolEscents). The overall goal is to develop and evaluate a trans-diagnostic, stepped-care intervention targeting common mental disorders in school-going adolescents in India. The PRIDE intervention architecture involves two sequential psychological treatments of incremental intensity. The first step is a brief problem-solving intervention delivered by lay counsellors. Adolescents with enduring mental health problems are referred to a higher intensity trans-diagnostic treatment delivered by psychologists.

The trial described here is embedded within a host trial that is testing the effectiveness of the low-intensity problem-solving intervention. The embedded trial will evaluate the impact of the classroom sensitization activities over and above the school-level activities on referral rates generated for the host trial.

Study design and setting:

An embedded recruitment trial will apply a stepped-wedge, cluster (class)-randomized controlled design in 70 classes across six Government-run secondary schools in New Delhi.

Eligibility criteria: Please see section on eligibility.

Interventions: Please see section on Intervention arms.

Outcomes: Please see section on outcome measures.

Trial scheme:

The trial will be conducted over 12 weeks and recruit 70 classes. The referral outcomes for the students will be reported every four weeks across these classes. As each class has an average enrollment of 50, the study will follow around 3400 students for the entire trial duration of 12 weeks.

Each class will switch over from the control condition to the intervention condition at 4-week intervals (excluding holidays and exam breaks), over 2 steps. During the first 4-week period, only school-level sensitization activities will be implemented. In the next 4-week period (first step), 35 randomly selected classes (sequence 1) will receive the classroom sensitization intervention. In the final 4-week period (second step), the remaining 35 classes (sequence 2) will receive the classroom sensitization intervention. Schedules for sensitization in the allocated classes will be shared with the schools in advance to ensure access.

Power calculation:

We based our power calculation on a within-period comparison for a stepped wedge design (Thompson et al., 2018) using Stata package "clustersampsi". Based on pilot data, we anticipated referral rates of 5% and 15% on the control and intervention conditions respectively, with an intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.124. Using these parameters, a sample size of 70 classes (average class size of 50 students) will have 92% power to detect a difference of 10 percentage points (treating the outcome as a binomial variable), at a significance level of 0.05.

Data collection:

The primary outcome (referral rate) will be collated from referral logs maintained by researchers in each school. Referral data will be aggregated over each 4-week period. Secondary outcomes pertaining to the eligibility and clinical characteristics of students referred to the host trial will be derived from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman et al., 2000).

Statistical analysis:

The baseline characteristics of the participating 70 classes, including class size and gender composition, will be described and assessed for any systematic differences across the two sequences. The primary outcome will be analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with robust standard errors. GEE is a recommended method for analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trials, providing population-averaged effects of exposure across trial conditions (Barker et al., 2016). GEE allows for longitudinal data analysis without resorting to fully specified random effect models and can be applied to both continuous and categorical outcomes (Liang and Zeger, 1986). It provides both parameter estimates and standard errors that are corrected for clustering of data and are consistent despite misspecifications in the correlation structure. For this trial, the clustering of data will be specified at the class level. Analysis of the secondary and exploratory outcomes will also be undertaken using the GEE method. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted using a 'within-period comparison' of data from the second period only (Thompson et al., 2018). No interim analysis will be undertaken.

Process evaluation:

We will undertake descriptive analysis of quantitative process data in order to explore potential sources of variation in the implementation of intervention procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Help-Seeking Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Classroom sensitization session (plus school-level sensitization activities)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Classroom sensitization session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A one-off classroom information and engagement session will be delivered in addition to school-level sensitization activities. Individual classroom sessions will be conducted by a 'lay' counsellor with support from a researcher.

The classroom session will start with a short animated video which provides age-appropriate information about types, causes, impacts and ways of coping with common mental health problems. The video will be followed by a guided group discussion, structured around a standardized script that builds on the topics covered in the video. In case of technical difficulties that may prevent the video from being shown, a flipchart based on still illustrations from the video will be used.

At the end of the session, students will be handed a self-referral form which includes normalizing information and question-based prompts to assist with self-identification of mental health problems.

School-level sensitization activities

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The control condition intervention will comprise sensitization activities conducted at the whole school level. These activities will include:

1. Posters containing information about the school counselling program and referral pathways will be displayed in prominent locations at each school.
2. A drop-box for student self-referral slips will be set up in a prominent location at each school.
3. Information meetings with teachers and the principal will be conducted at each school from the beginning of the trial.

Control

School-level sensitization activities only

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

School-level sensitization activities

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The control condition intervention will comprise sensitization activities conducted at the whole school level. These activities will include:

1. Posters containing information about the school counselling program and referral pathways will be displayed in prominent locations at each school.
2. A drop-box for student self-referral slips will be set up in a prominent location at each school.
3. Information meetings with teachers and the principal will be conducted at each school from the beginning of the trial.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Classroom sensitization session

A one-off classroom information and engagement session will be delivered in addition to school-level sensitization activities. Individual classroom sessions will be conducted by a 'lay' counsellor with support from a researcher.

The classroom session will start with a short animated video which provides age-appropriate information about types, causes, impacts and ways of coping with common mental health problems. The video will be followed by a guided group discussion, structured around a standardized script that builds on the topics covered in the video. In case of technical difficulties that may prevent the video from being shown, a flipchart based on still illustrations from the video will be used.

At the end of the session, students will be handed a self-referral form which includes normalizing information and question-based prompts to assist with self-identification of mental health problems.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

School-level sensitization activities

The control condition intervention will comprise sensitization activities conducted at the whole school level. These activities will include:

1. Posters containing information about the school counselling program and referral pathways will be displayed in prominent locations at each school.
2. A drop-box for student self-referral slips will be set up in a prominent location at each school.
3. Information meetings with teachers and the principal will be conducted at each school from the beginning of the trial.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Classes from grades 9-12 in the six collaborating schools.


* Enrolled as a student in grades 9-12 (aged 13-20 years) at one of the collaborating schools
* Adolescent willing and able to consent for participation in the research

Exclusion Criteria

* Classes that have received classroom sensitization sessions during earlier pilot work.

ADOLESCENT PARTICIPANTS


* Adolescent not proficient in written and spoken Hindi, as needed to participate fully in study procedures
* Adolescent needing urgent medical or mental health care
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sangath

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vikram Patel, MRCPsych PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sangath

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, Arora M, Azzopardi P, Baldwin W, Bonell C, Kakuma R, Kennedy E, Mahon J, McGovern T, Mokdad AH, Patel V, Petroni S, Reavley N, Taiwo K, Waldfogel J, Wickremarathne D, Barroso C, Bhutta Z, Fatusi AO, Mattoo A, Diers J, Fang J, Ferguson J, Ssewamala F, Viner RM. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1. Epub 2016 May 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27174304 (View on PubMed)

Wei Y, McGrath PJ, Hayden J, Kutcher S. Mental health literacy measures evaluating knowledge, attitudes and help-seeking: a scoping review. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 17;15:291. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0681-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26576680 (View on PubMed)

Kutcher S, Wei Y, Costa S, Gusmao R, Skokauskas N, Sourander A. Enhancing mental health literacy in young people. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;25(6):567-9. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0867-9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27236662 (View on PubMed)

Wei Y, Hayden JA, Kutcher S, Zygmunt A, McGrath P. The effectiveness of school mental health literacy programs to address knowledge, attitudes and help seeking among youth. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 May;7(2):109-21. doi: 10.1111/eip.12010. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23343220 (View on PubMed)

Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H. Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;177:534-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.6.534.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11102329 (View on PubMed)

Thompson JA, Davey C, Fielding K, Hargreaves JR, Hayes RJ. Robust analysis of stepped wedge trials using cluster-level summaries within periods. Stat Med. 2018 Jul 20;37(16):2487-2500. doi: 10.1002/sim.7668. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29635789 (View on PubMed)

Barker D, McElduff P, D'Este C, Campbell MJ. Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jun 6;16:69. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0176-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27267471 (View on PubMed)

Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13-22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Parikh R, Hoogendoorn A, Michelson D, Ruwaard J, Sharma R, Bhat B, Malik K, Sahu R, Cuijpers P, Patel V. Increasing demand for school counselling through a lay counsellor-delivered classroom sensitisation intervention: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial in New Delhi, India. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e003902. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003902.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34172486 (View on PubMed)

Parikh R, Michelson D, Malik K, Shinde S, Weiss HA, Hoogendoorn A, Ruwaard J, Krishna M, Sharma R, Bhat B, Sahu R, Mathur S, Sudhir P, King M, Cuijpers P, Chorpita BF, Fairburn CG, Patel V. The effectiveness of a low-intensity problem-solving intervention for common adolescent mental health problems in New Delhi, India: protocol for a school-based, individually randomized controlled trial with an embedded stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled recruitment trial. Trials. 2019 Sep 18;20(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3573-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31533783 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SANPRIDE_003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Health Questionnaire Study
NCT06956378 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA