Comparative Study of Strategies for Management of Duchenne Myopathy (DM)

NCT ID: NCT03633565

Last Updated: 2018-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-30

Study Completion Date

2021-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Comparing different lines of treatment of Duchenne Myopathy (DM) and assessment of new lines of treatment (mesenchymal stem cell, phosphodiesterase inhibitors) in reducing the impact of disability in the patients with Duchenne Myopathy and slowing the progression of cardiomyopathy
2. Upsetting and implementation of the best treatment plan for those children with Duchenne myopathy which is suitable for the available resources in Assiut University Children Hospital

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy(DMD) is the most commonly inherited pediatric muscular disorder. It is an X-linked genetic progressive and degenerative myopathy characterized by progressive weakness, which can lead to loss of motor functions in puberty as well as cardiac,respiratory involvement and premature death. The disease is one of a group of myopathies that differ depending on the degree of severity and the affected muscle types. It occurs at a rate of approximately 1:3500 male births and arises due to spontaneous mutations in the Dystrophin gene (locus Xp21.2); 65% of causative mutations are intragenic deletions, 6-10% are intragenic duplications and 30-35% are point mutations (along with other sequence variations). The disease is caused by a deficiency of Dystrophin or the synthesis of functionally impotent Dystrophin, a critical protein component of the Dystrophin glycoprotein complex acting as a link between the cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix in skeletal and cardiac muscles. A consequence of Dystrophin glycoprotein complex inefficiency is muscle fragility, contraction-induced damage, necrosis and inflammation.

Glucocorticoid can prolong ambulation by 2 to 3 years, reduce scoliosis, and temper pulmonary and cardiac decline in the second decade of life. However, glucocorticoids causes well-known side effects, which are intolerable in more than 25% of patients. Thus, a disease-specific treatment is a major unmet need. Investigators have proposed various possibilities for the beneficial effects of corticosteroid based mainly on observations in mouse models of muscular dystrophy and on a limited number of studies in patients.

These possibilities include

1. Reducing cytotoxic T lymphocytes
2. Increasing Laminin expression and myogenic repair
3. Retarding muscle apoptosis and cellular infiltration
4. Enhancing Dystrophin expression
5. Affecting neuromuscular transmission

Some patients with Duchenne Myopathy treated early with steroids appear to have an improved long-term prognosis in muscle, myocardial outcome, and can help keep patients ambulatory for more years than expected without treatment. One protocol gives prednisone (0.75 mg/kg/day) for the 1st 10 days of each month to avoid chronic complications. Deflazacort, administered as 0.9 mg/kg/day, may be more effective than prednisone. The American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society recommend administering corticosteroids during the ambulatory stage of the disease.Published recommendations suggest starting therapy between 2 and 5 years of age in boys whose strength has plateaued or is declining, but earlier treatment may be more beneficial.

Skeletal muscle has a great capacity to regenerate following muscle wasting caused by trauma or disease.This regenerative potential is attributed primarily to skeletal-muscle resident stem cells called satellite cells. In Duchenne Myopathy, satellite cells are exhausted following many rounds of muscle degeneration and regeneration. Hence, satellite cells and their progeny (myoblasts) have been considered as a promising candidate for cell replacement therapy for DMD and other types of muscle disease. Small quantities of adult stem cells exist in most tissues throughout the body where they remain quiescent for long periods of time prior to being activated in response to disease or tissue injury. Adult stem cells can be isolated from cells of the hematopoietic, neural, dermal, muscle and hepatic systems. Adult stem cells give rise to cell types of the tissue from which they originated, but according to scientific reports, they can differentiate into lineages other than their tissue of origin, e.g. transplanted bone marrow or enriched hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) were reported to give rise to cells of the mesoderm, endoderm and ectoderm.

Two main types of stem cells usually derived from adult bone marrow are HSCs and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). They can sometimes be obtained from fat, skin, periosteum, synovial membrane and muscle as well. MSCs are multipotent and capable of differentiating into several connective tissue types including osteocytes, chondrocytes, adipocytes, tenocytes and myoblasts. They can also impose an additional anti-inflammatory and paracrine effect on differentiation and tissue regeneration via cytokine pathways and have anti-apoptotic features. These genetically determined pluripotent cells may be easily isolated from bone marrow because they have membrane proteins (marker called cluster of differentiation (CD34 +) and specific marker STRO-I). Compared with pluripotent embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stem cell have a greater biosafety profile and lower risk of tumorigenicity, and perhaps that is why numerous -mesenchymal stem cell based therapies have made it to the clinical trial stage. Stem cell based therapies for the treatment of Duchenne Myopathy can proceed via two strategies.

The first is autologous stem cell transfer involving cells from a patient with Duchenne Myopathy that are genetically altered in vitro to restore dystrophin expression and are subsequently re-implanted. The second is allogenic stem cell transfer, containing cells from an individual with functional dystrophin, which are transplanted into a dystrophic patient.

Intramuscular route of administration can be considered most appropriate as muscular dystrophy is primarily a muscle disease. The cells can be injected in several points in the muscle alternatively they can be injected in the motor point of the muscle. A motor point is the point at which the motor branch of the innervating nerve enters the muscle. It is the point with the highest concentration of motor endplates and myoneural synapses. Due to high numbers of neuromuscular junctions at this point, a muscle contraction can be easily elicited using minimal electric stimulus. Motor points can therefore be identified as superficial points directly over the points on the muscles with help of external electrical stimulation. Limitation of this method is that only superficial muscles can be stimulated using this method.

In an open study, Sharma and colleagues demonstrated the efficacy of autologous bone marrow mononuclear transplantation by intramuscularly to patients with Duchenne Myopathy, Becker muscular dystrophy and limb girdle muscular dystrophy. However, they did not provide the molecular diagnosis of these dystrophies. No significant adverse events were noted. An increase in trunk muscle strength was seen in 53% of the cases, 48% showed an increase in upper limb strength, 59% showed an increase in lower limb strength and approximately 10% showed improved gait. Eighty seven percent of 150 patients had functional improvement upon physical examination and electromyogram studies after 12 month.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Steroid

prednisolone 20 mg tablet by mouth taken once daily for 10 days each month for 2 years

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prednisolone (Steroids)

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet 20 mg

Phosphodiestrase inhibitors

sildenafil 25 mg tablet by mouth once daily for 2 years

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sildenafil (Phosphodiesterase inhibitors)

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet 25mg

Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation

The cells can be injected intramuscular in several points in the muscle alternatively they can be injected in the motor point of the muscle. A motor point is the point at which the motor branch of the innervating nerve enters the muscle). This injection is repeated every 6 month up to 2 years.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

stem cell transplantation intramuscular

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sildenafil (Phosphodiesterase inhibitors)

tablet 25mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisolone (Steroids)

tablet 20 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation

stem cell transplantation intramuscular

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

sildenafil viagra Prednisolone 20 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of DMD confirmed by electromyogram (EMG) , Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level and/ or DNA analysis or muscle biopsy.
* Male patients
* Age 5-15y.
* Ambulatory (loss of ambulation was only seen in those with baseline 6 Minute Walk Distance {6MWD} \<325 meters.)
* No clinical evidence of heart failure.

Exclusion Criteria

* Female patients
* Any injury which may impact functional testing, e.g. upper or lower limb fracture.
* hypertension, diabetes,
* Wheelchair bound.
* Cardiac rhythm disorder, specifically: rhythm other than sinus, supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia.or heart failure (left ventricle ejection fraction {LVEF \< 50%}.
* Continuous ventilatory support.
* Liver disease (acute, chronic liver disease)
* Renal impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nancy Alaa

principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emad EL Daly, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Duaa Mahmoud, Assistant professor

Role: CONTACT

01223112124

Mervat Youssef, Lecturer

Role: CONTACT

01142606221

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mercuri E, Muntoni F. Muscular dystrophies. Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):845-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61897-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23465426 (View on PubMed)

Nallamilli BR, Ankala A, Hegde M. Molecular diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2014 Oct 1;83:9.25.1-29. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0925s83.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25271841 (View on PubMed)

Lapidos KA, Kakkar R, McNally EM. The dystrophin glycoprotein complex: signaling strength and integrity for the sarcolemma. Circ Res. 2004 Apr 30;94(8):1023-31. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000126574.61061.25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15117830 (View on PubMed)

Emery AE. The muscular dystrophies. Lancet. 2002 Feb 23;359(9307):687-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07815-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11879882 (View on PubMed)

Wong BL, Christopher C. Corticosteroids in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a reappraisal. J Child Neurol. 2002 Mar;17(3):183-90. doi: 10.1177/088307380201700306.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12026233 (View on PubMed)

Khan MA. Corticosteroid therapy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurol Sci. 1993 Dec 1;120(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90017-s.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8289083 (View on PubMed)

Kojima S, Takagi A, Watanabe T. [Effect of prednisolone on apoptosis and cellular infiltration in mdx mouse muscle]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1999 Nov;39(11):1109-13. Japanese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10689931 (View on PubMed)

Fukudome T, Shibuya N, Yoshimura T, Eguchi K. Short-term effects of prednisolone on neuromuscular transmission in the isolated mdx mouse diaphragm. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2000 Nov;192(3):211-7. doi: 10.1620/tjem.192.211.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11249150 (View on PubMed)

Wang YX, Rudnicki MA. Satellite cells, the engines of muscle repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011 Dec 21;13(2):127-33. doi: 10.1038/nrm3265.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22186952 (View on PubMed)

Heslop L, Morgan JE, Partridge TA. Evidence for a myogenic stem cell that is exhausted in dystrophic muscle. J Cell Sci. 2000 Jun;113 ( Pt 12):2299-308. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.12.2299.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10825301 (View on PubMed)

Galli R, Borello U, Gritti A, Minasi MG, Bjornson C, Coletta M, Mora M, De Angelis MG, Fiocco R, Cossu G, Vescovi AL. Skeletal myogenic potential of human and mouse neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Oct;3(10):986-91. doi: 10.1038/79924.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11017170 (View on PubMed)

Toma JG, Akhavan M, Fernandes KJ, Barnabe-Heider F, Sadikot A, Kaplan DR, Miller FD. Isolation of multipotent adult stem cells from the dermis of mammalian skin. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Sep;3(9):778-84. doi: 10.1038/ncb0901-778.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11533656 (View on PubMed)

Qu-Petersen Z, Deasy B, Jankowski R, Ikezawa M, Cummins J, Pruchnic R, Mytinger J, Cao B, Gates C, Wernig A, Huard J. Identification of a novel population of muscle stem cells in mice: potential for muscle regeneration. J Cell Biol. 2002 May 27;157(5):851-64. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200108150. Epub 2002 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12021255 (View on PubMed)

Shafritz DA, Oertel M, Menthena A, Nierhoff D, Dabeva MD. Liver stem cells and prospects for liver reconstitution by transplanted cells. Hepatology. 2006 Feb;43(2 Suppl 1):S89-98. doi: 10.1002/hep.21047.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16447292 (View on PubMed)

Price FD, Kuroda K, Rudnicki MA. Stem cell based therapies to treat muscular dystrophy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Feb;1772(2):272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Sep 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17034994 (View on PubMed)

Keating A. Mesenchymal stromal cells: new directions. Cell Stem Cell. 2012 Jun 14;10(6):709-716. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22704511 (View on PubMed)

Mendell JR, Clark KR. Challenges for gene therapy for muscular dystrophy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2006 Jan;6(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s11910-996-0009-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16469271 (View on PubMed)

Partridge TA. Stem cell therapies for neuromuscular diseases. Acta Neurol Belg. 2004 Dec;104(4):141-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15742603 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

smdmauch

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tadalafil as Adjuvant Therapy for DMD
NCT05195775 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Twice Weekly Steroids and Exercise as Therapy for DMD
NCT04322357 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Extension Study of NS-089/NCNP-02 in DMD
NCT05135663 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2