Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Nivolumab in HCC Patients Treated by Electroporation
NCT ID: NCT03630640
Last Updated: 2024-07-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
43 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-11
2023-08-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In addition to mRFA the arsenal of ablations has grown considerably with the emergence of new techniques. They allow the expansion of indications for PA, especially in patients with poor prognostic tumors or relatively advanced beyond the Milan criteria . In this setting, multibipolar mode using no touch technique (mbpRFAnt) increases the tumour volume that can be ablated, allowing the removal of large tumors\> 5 cm . Furthermore, electroporation (EP) is a new PA technique that does not promote thermoablation but induce tumoral cells apoptosis and is particularly interesting for difficult-to-treat lesions located near vascular or biliary trunks . Inadequate tumour control is then de facto greater in these situations, around 20% at one year.
The idea of optimizing HCC curative treatments using neoadjuvant or adjuvant biotherapy, particularly in patients with advanced tumors in curative intent, is particularly attractive. One trial in adjuvant setting was conducted, the STORM trial, that tested the benefit of sorafenib in curative intent of in Milan HCC. This negative trial included patients with in Milan HCC, with an expected low rate of recurrence with only few patients treated by PA.
In parallel, the development of new molecules for HCC treatment, especially immunotherapy, seems to give promising results in palliative setting . Furthermore, PA procedures and most likely electroporation induce T-cell recruitement that may foster immunomodulation .
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant trials using these new molecules must now be cautiously designed based on the rigorous selection of special populations and therapeutic indications.
This project proposes a Phase 2 trial testing the safety and efficacy of treatment with Nivolumab in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting in patients with advanced HCC treated by electroporation in curative intent.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hepatic Intra-Arterial Administration of Ipilimumab in Combination With Intra-venous Nivolumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT04823403
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT04039607
Feasibility and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab (CaboNivo) Followed by Definitive Resection for Patients With Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
NCT03299946
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
NCT03222076
A Study of Nivolumab in Participants With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Are at High Risk of Recurrence After Curative Hepatic Resection or Ablation
NCT03383458
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
-Inclusion visit The inclusion visit takes place between 15 days and no later than 3 days before the patient's hospitalization for Neoadjuvant therapy
Eligible patients will receive :
* 2 nivolumab infusions in a neoadjuvant setting (every 15 days) The treatment will be carried out every 2 weeks s, for 2 cycles before EP procedure The patient is hospitalized one day for treatment
* EP procedure performed in a curative attempt EP procedure will be performed according to previously described procedure in the setting of routine management of HCC as decided in multidisciplinary boards in each centre.
* 12 nivolumab infusions in an adjuvant setting (every 30 days) during one year. The patient is hospitalized one day for infusion
* Classical follow-up during an additional year (every 3 months) Follow up after adjuvant therapy (M12-M24) The usual evaluation will be performed every 3 months
Constitution of a biobank with :
* paraffin and frozen tumoral and non tumoral biopsy sampled at before and after one month of neoadjuvant Nivolumab (second biopsies at the time of the electroporation procedure)
* Serum samples and Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) before and after one month of neoadjuvant Nivolumab then after EP at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nivolumab Injection [Opdivo]
Intravenous Nivolumab 240 Q2W neoadjuvant Intravenous Nivolumab 480 mg Q4W- adjuvant for 12 months
Nivolumab Injection [Opdivo]
Intravenous Nivolumab 240 Q2W neoadjuvant Intravenous Nivolumab 480 mg Q4W- adjuvant up to 12 months after EP
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nivolumab Injection [Opdivo]
Intravenous Nivolumab 240 Q2W neoadjuvant Intravenous Nivolumab 480 mg Q4W- adjuvant up to 12 months after EP
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histological diagnosis of HCC, whether new or recurrent following a prior curative therapeutic management \> 6 months.
* Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage Category A
* Patients with HCC eligible for EP as assessed by multidisciplinary board corresponding to the following extension:
* Uninodular HCC≥ 2 cm and ≤ 5 cm, no macroscopic vascular invasion
* Multinodular HCC maximum 3 nodules ≤ 3 cm, no macroscopic vascular invasion
* At least one uni-dimensional measurable lesion by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to modified RECIST for HCC
* Liver function status Child-Pugh Class A
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 2
* Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function
* Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
* Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception
* Patients affiliated to a Social Security System
* Written informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with contraindication to contrast medium intravenous injection either gadolinium or iodinate
* Prior liver transplantation or candidates for liver transplantation
* Prior systemic treatment for HCC, in particular agents targeting T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways (including those targeting PD-1, PD-L1 or PD-L2, CD137, or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen \[CTLA-4\]).
* Patients with uncontrolled HBV infection and viral load above 100 IU/mL.
* Patients with large esophageal varices at risk of bleeding that are not being treated with conventional medical intervention
* Past or concurrent history of neoplasm other than HCC, except for in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri and/or non-melanoma skin cancer and superficial bladder tumors. Any cancer curatively treated \> 3 years prior to study entry is permitted
* Known history or symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors
* Major surgical procedure or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before enrolment
* Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ class 2
* Unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months before enrolment
* Grade 3 (severe) hypertension ≥180 and/or ≥110 mmHG (systolic and diastolic, according to National Heart Foundation 2016)
* Patients with phaeochromocytoma
* Refractory ascites according to EASL guidelines definition (ascites that cannot be mobilized or the early recurrence of which cannot be prevented because of a lack of response to sodium restriction and diuretic treatment)
* Persistent proteinuria of NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 ≥ Grade 3
* Ongoing infection \> Grade 2 according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Hepatitis B is allowed if no active replication is present (HBV replication below 100 IU/mL). Hepatitis C is allowed if no antiviral treatment is required
* Clinically significant bleeding NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 ≥ Grade 3 within 30 days before enrolment
* Arterial or venous thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 6 months before enrolment
* Any psychological, familial, sociological, geographical or illness or medical condition that could jeopardize the safety of the patient and/or his compliance with the study protocol and follow-up procedure
* Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* Seizure disorder requiring medication
* Non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture
* Known hypersensitivity to the study drug or excipients in the formulation
* Any malabsorption condition
* Breast feeding
* Pregnancy
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
INDUSTRY
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pierre NAHON, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
APHP-Hôpital Jean Verdier
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Jean Verdier
Bondy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sutter O, Calvo J, N'Kontchou G, Nault JC, Ourabia R, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Bourcier V, Zentar N, Bouhafs F, Sellier N, Diallo A, Seror O. Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Amenable to Thermal Ablation Techniques: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series. Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):877-886. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161413. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V, Chau GY, Yang J, Kudo M, Cai J, Poon RT, Han KH, Tak WY, Lee HC, Song T, Roayaie S, Bolondi L, Lee KS, Makuuchi M, Souza F, Berre MA, Meinhardt G, Llovet JM; STORM investigators. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00198-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, Crocenzi TS, Kudo M, Hsu C, Kim TY, Choo SP, Trojan J, Welling TH Rd, Meyer T, Kang YK, Yeo W, Chopra A, Anderson J, Dela Cruz C, Lang L, Neely J, Tang H, Dastani HB, Melero I. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2492-2502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31046-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P171001J
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.