Phase III Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Combination With Docetaxel in Adult Subjects With Non-small Cell Lung Cancers as a Second or Third Line Therapy

NCT ID: NCT03626545

Last Updated: 2023-08-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

245 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-23

Study Completion Date

2021-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was designed to evaluate the role of canakinumab in combination with docetaxel in subjects with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a multicenter, Phase III study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in combination with docetaxel versus placebo in combination with docetaxel, as second- or third-line treatment. The study included adult subjects with advanced NSCLC whose disease had progressed after prior treatment with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor. Subjects had also been pre-treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, either given together with PD-(L)1 inhibitor or sequentially.

The study consisted of 2 parts:

* Part 1: Safety run-in. This part was conducted to confirm the Recommended Phase 3 Regimen (RP3R) of the canakinumab and docetaxel combination. Participants were treated for at least 2 complete cycles of treatment (21 days per cycle) for safety evaluation (DLT-Dose Limiting Toxicities) to define RP3R. Participants from the safety run-in part were treated until any discontinuation criteria were met. After treatment discontinuation, all participants were followed for safety evaluations during the safety follow up period (up to 130 days). Additionally, subjects who discontinued study treatment without prior documented disease progression continued efficacy assessments in the efficacy follow-up phase irrespective of the start of new antineoplastic therapy and until documented progressive disease as per protocol. After the RP3R was determined, enrollment in this part was closed and additional participants were enrolled in the randomized part (part 2) of the study. Ongoing patients from the safety run-in part continued their treatment at the assigned dose level according to the dose and schedule for the safety run-in part.
* Part 2: Randomized part. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled part of the study opened after confirmation of the RP3R for the combination of canakinumab and docetaxel. Participants from the randomized part were treated until any discontinuation criteria were met as per protocol. After treatment discontinuation, all participants were followed for safety evaluations during the safety follow up period (up to 130 days). Additionally, subjects who discontinued study treatment without prior documented disease progression continued efficacy assessments in the efficacy follow-up phase irrespective of the start of new antineoplastic therapy and until documented progressive disease as per protocol.

Based on the lack of efficacy observed in the primary analysis, Novartis decided to halt canakinumab/placebo treatment. Subjects continued to receive docetaxel if they were deriving clinical benefit as per investigator assessment until discontinuation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Small-Cell Lung

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Safety run-in part: Canakinumab+docetaxel

Participants were treated with full doses of docetaxel 75mg/m\^2 intravenous and canakinumab 200 mg subcutaneous on Day 1 of each 21-Day cycle (dose level 1). Subjects were assessed for at least 2 complete cycles of treatment (21 days per cycle; a total of 42 days) for safety evaluation (DLT) to define RP3R. De-escalation to canakinumab 200 mg subcutaneous every 6 weeks + docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2, every 3 weeks could also be considered.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canakinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Canakinumab, 200 mg, subcutaneous. The initial dose regimen was once every 3 weeks (on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle)

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel 75mg/m\^2, intravenous, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

Randomized part: Canakinumab + docetaxel

Participants were treated with canakinumab subcutaneous at RP3R and docetaxel at 75 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canakinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Canakinumab, 200 mg, subcutaneous. The initial dose regimen was once every 3 weeks (on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle)

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel 75mg/m\^2, intravenous, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

Randomized part: Placebo + docetaxel

Participants were treated with placebo subcutaneous at RP3R and docetaxel at 75 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel 75mg/m\^2, intravenous, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo, sub-cutaneous, admnistered at the RP3R defined in Part 1-safety run-in.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Canakinumab

Canakinumab, 200 mg, subcutaneous. The initial dose regimen was once every 3 weeks (on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle)

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel

Docetaxel 75mg/m\^2, intravenous, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo, sub-cutaneous, admnistered at the RP3R defined in Part 1-safety run-in.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACZ885

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed advanced (stage IIIB) or metastatic NSCLC.
* Subject had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy and one prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease.
* Subject with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1.
* Subject with at least 1 evaluable (measurable or non-measurable) lesion by RECIST 1.1 in solid tumors criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject who previously received docetaxel, canakinumab (or another IL-1β inhibitor), or any systemic therapy for their locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC other than one platinum-based chemotherapy and one prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor.
* Subject with EGFRor ALK positive tumor.
* History of severe hypersensitivity reaction to monoclonal antibodies, taxanes or excipients of docetaxel or canakinumab.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory Winship Cancer Institute

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Saint Luke's Hospital/Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute Dept of Regulatory

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center Albert Einstein College of Med

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Huntsman Cancer Institute Univ of Utah .

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berazategui, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

La Rioja, , Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Santiago del Estero, , Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shepparton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sint-Niklaas, Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Itajaí, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brno - Bohunice, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ostrava Vitkovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Odense C, , Denmark

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Le Mans, Cedex 09, France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bron, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Gerlingen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Großhansdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Heraklion Crete, Greece, Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Törökbálint, Pest County, Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lucca, LU, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rozzano, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aviano, PN, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Himeji, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chuo Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amman, , Jordan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

El Achrafiyé, , Lebanon

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pushkin Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, Seocho Gu, South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Málaga, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Badalona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

A Coruña, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Canada Chile China Czechia Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary Israel Italy Japan Jordan Lebanon Netherlands Poland Russia Singapore South Korea Spain Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Paz-Ares L, Goto Y, Wan-Teck Lim D, Halmos B, Chul Cho B, Cobo M, Luis Gonzalez Larriba J, Zhou C, Demedts I, Atmaca A, Baka S, Mookerjee B, Portella S, Zhu Z, Wu J, Demanse D, Dharan B, Reck M. Canakinumab in combination with docetaxel compared with docetaxel alone for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer following platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy (CANOPY-2): A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lung Cancer. 2024 Mar;189:107451. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107451. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38354535 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.novctrd.com/ctrdweb/patientsummary/patientsummaries?patientSummaryId=1221

A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novctrd.com

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-002480-26

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CACZ885V2301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.