Dose-Escalated Proton Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03624660
Last Updated: 2025-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-24
2028-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hypofractionated Proton Radiation Therapy for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT01368055
Proton Therapy for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT00693238
Phase I/II Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT00214097
Hypofractionated WPPT With HDR Boost
NCT06591819
MRI Guided Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of High Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT05676463
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Proton therapy (PT) is a type of ionizing radiation therapy that reduces the dose of excess radiation delivered to normal tissues. By escalating the radiation dose just to the area of the known tumor within the prostate, one could potentially reduce the amount of excess radiation delivered to surrounding organs.This reduction in dose would improve the therapeutic ratio by improving disease control while minimizing the risk for additional toxicity.
In an effort to take advantage of dose escalation's potential for improving disease control but also to limit toxicity, the use of advanced imaging to identify prostate cancer and provide a focal radiation boost to the area have proven to be useful. Recent advances in MRI have made it the most promising technique in identifying and targeting IPTs, improving both cancer control rates and decreasing toxicity.
The study features hypofractionation and a simultaneous integrated boost to the MRI identified intraprostatic tumor (IPT) as a method of dose-escalating radiation therapy. The study will include patients with high-risk prostate cancer who are at the highest risk for recurrence. Radiation therapy will be delivered over the course of 8-9 weeks. Additionally, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) will be started 8-10 weeks prior to starting radiation and continued for a total of 18 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
2 treatment groups:
* HR-A: Patients with \<15% risk of positive pelvic nodes, without posterior extracapsular extension and negative for seminal vesicle invasion on exam pretreatment diagnostic MRI.
* HR-B: Patient with ≥ 15% risk of positive pelvic nodes or with seminal vesicle invasion, without posterior extracapsular extension.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HR-A (High-risk A)
* Prostate and proximal seminal vesicles: 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total dose of 78 cobalt gray equivalent.
* Simultaneous integrated boost to the IPT: 2.2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total dose of 85.8 cobalt gray equivalent.
HR-A
The prostate and proximal seminal vesicles will be treated to 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 78 cobalt gray equivalent.
Simultaneous integrated boost to the IPT will be delivered to 2.2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 85.8 cobalt gray equivalent.
Treatment will be given once a day, approximately 5 treatments per week (Monday- Friday), over 8-9 weeks.
HR-B (High-risk B)
* Prostate, proximal seminal vesicles, and pelvic nodes: 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total does of 46 cobalt gray equivalent.
* Prostate and proximal seminal vesicles: 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total dose of 32 cobalt gray equivalent.
* Entire uninvolved seminal vesicle when part of the seminal vesicle is involved with tumor: 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total dose of 78 cobalt gray equivalent.
* Simultaneous integrated boost to the IPT: 2.2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction to a total dose of 85.8 cobalt gray equivalent.
HR-B
The prostate, proximal seminal vesicles, and pelvic nodes will be treated to 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 23 fractions for a total of 46 cobalt gray equivalent.
The prostate and proximal seminal vesicles will be treated to an additional 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 16 fractions for a total of 32 cobalt gray equivalent.
Electively treat the entire uninvolved seminal vesicle to 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 78 cobalt gray equivalent when part of the seminal vesicle is involved with tumor.
Simultaneous integrated boost to the IPT will be delivered to 2.2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 85.8 cobalt gray equivalent.
Treatment will be given once a day, approximately 5 treatments per week (Monday- Friday), over 8-9 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HR-A
The prostate and proximal seminal vesicles will be treated to 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 78 cobalt gray equivalent.
Simultaneous integrated boost to the IPT will be delivered to 2.2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 85.8 cobalt gray equivalent.
Treatment will be given once a day, approximately 5 treatments per week (Monday- Friday), over 8-9 weeks.
HR-B
The prostate, proximal seminal vesicles, and pelvic nodes will be treated to 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 23 fractions for a total of 46 cobalt gray equivalent.
The prostate and proximal seminal vesicles will be treated to an additional 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 16 fractions for a total of 32 cobalt gray equivalent.
Electively treat the entire uninvolved seminal vesicle to 2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 78 cobalt gray equivalent when part of the seminal vesicle is involved with tumor.
Simultaneous integrated boost to the IPT will be delivered to 2.2 cobalt gray equivalent per fraction for 39 fractions for a total of 85.8 cobalt gray equivalent.
Treatment will be given once a day, approximately 5 treatments per week (Monday- Friday), over 8-9 weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient must be at least 18 years at the time of consent.
* Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with AJCC Clinical Stage T1to T3b disease with histological evaluation via biopsy or repeat biopsy within 12 months prior to registration.
* Patients must undergo a pretreatment diagnostic MRI of the prostate on a 1.5T to 3T Tesla machine within 6 months prior to study registration.
* A focal IPT must be visible on MRI within the prostate and/or seminal vesicles and this MRI must be obtained within 6 months of planning CT scan.
* A biopsy of the dominant lesion is recommended but not required. If an ultrasound guided sextant biopsy was positive for prostatic adenocarcinoma in the area of the MRI identified intraprostatic lesion, this will be acceptable and another guided biopsy targeting the MRI identified disease will not be necessary.
* Patients with at least one of the following high-risk factors: cT3a-T3b OR Gleason 9-10 OR PSA \> 30 OR more than 1 high-risk factors must be present: clinical stage of T3, Gleason score 8-10, or PSA 20 ng/ml or greater.
* Hemoglobin must be ≥ 10 g/ml within 4 months prior to registration.
* Zubrod performance status must be 0-1 within 4 months prior to registration.
* If patient has child-producing potential, they must be willing to use medically acceptable contraception during treatment and must be advised to use it for at least 1 year thereafter. This is not applicable if the patient is not sexually active or has had a vasectomy.
* Patients must be able to start treatment within 16 weeks of registration.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to undergo MRI of the prostate.
* Patients with a greater than 25% change in prostate volume from the pretreatment MRI of the prostate demonstrating the IPT and the treatment planning MRI. Patients in this case must undergo a repeat diagnostic MRI on a 1.5T to 3.0T Tesla machine and an IPT must still be visible.
* IPT that is more than 75% of the prostate volume when measured on the CT simulation scan.
* Evidence of distant metastasis (M1).
* Patients with positive nodes on cross-sectional imaging.
* Previous prostate cancer local treatment including prostatectomy, hyperthermia, high intensity focused ultrasound, brachytherapy, external-beam radiation therapy, and/or cryotherapy.
* Prior pelvic radiation therapy.
* No prior myocardial infarction within the last 6 months, severe congestive heart failure, or end stage renal disease.
* Active inflammatory bowel disease (diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) affecting the rectum.
* Bilateral hip replacement
* Prior intrapelvic surgery. This includes the following:
• Bladder surgery
* Prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or laser ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
* Patients receiving continuous and current anticoagulation with warfarin sodium (Coumadin), heparin sodium, clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix), dabigatran etexilate mesylate (Pradaxa), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), apixaban (Eliquis), edoxaban (Savaysa), enoxaparin sodium (Lovenox), prasugrel (Effient), ticagrelor (Brilinta), aspirin/er dipyridamole (Aggrenox), or fondaparinux sodium (Arixtra).
18 Years
100 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Curtis M Bryant, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8thedition ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2017.
Bryant C, Smith TL, Henderson RH, Hoppe BS, Mendenhall WM, Nichols RC, Morris CG, Williams CR, Su Z, Li Z, Lee D, Mendenhall NP. Five-Year Biochemical Results, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Delivery of Dose-Escalated Image Guided Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):422-434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.038. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, Starkschall G, Huang EH, Cheung MR, Lee AK, Pollack A. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.054. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, Aird EG, Bottomley D, Cowan RA, Huddart RA, Jose CC, Matthews JH, Millar J, Moore AR, Morgan RC, Russell JM, Scrase CD, Stephens RJ, Syndikus I, Parmar MK; RT01 collaborators. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70143-2.
Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, Bush DA, Lunt M, Spiegel DY, Skowronski R, Jabola BR, Rossi CJ. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8475. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Beckendorf V, Guerif S, Le Prise E, Cosset JM, Lefloch O, Chauvet B, Salem N, Chapet O, Bourdin S, Bachaud JM, Maingon P, Lagrange JL, Malissard L, Simon JM, Pommier P, Hay MH, Dubray B, Luporsi E, Bey P. The GETUG 70 Gy vs. 80 Gy randomized trial for localized prostate cancer: feasibility and acute toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1056-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.033.
Rodda S, Tyldesley S, Morris WJ, Keyes M, Halperin R, Pai H, McKenzie M, Duncan G, Morton G, Hamm J, Murray N. ASCENDE-RT: An Analysis of Treatment-Related Morbidity for a Randomized Trial Comparing a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost with a Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
Ippolito E, Mantini G, Morganti AG, Mazzeo E, Padula GD, Digesu C, Cilla S, Frascino V, Luzi S, Massaccesi M, Macchia G, Deodato F, Mattiucci GC, Piermattei A, Cellini N. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost to dominant intraprostatic lesion: preliminary report on toxicity. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr;35(2):158-62. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318209cd8f.
Fonteyne V, Villeirs G, Speleers B, De Neve W, De Wagter C, Lumen N, De Meerleer G. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as primary therapy for prostate cancer: report on acute toxicity after dose escalation with simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 1;72(3):799-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.040. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
Cellini N, Morganti AG, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V, Leone M, Luzi S, Manfredi R, Dinapoli N, Digesu' C, Smaniotto D. Analysis of intraprostatic failures in patients treated with hormonal therapy and radiotherapy: implications for conformal therapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jul 1;53(3):595-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02795-5.
Pucar D, Hricak H, Shukla-Dave A, Kuroiwa K, Drobnjak M, Eastham J, Scardino PT, Zelefsky MJ. Clinically significant prostate cancer local recurrence after radiation therapy occurs at the site of primary tumor: magnetic resonance imaging and step-section pathology evidence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Sep 1;69(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.065.
Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, Schroder FH, Parkinson R, Barentsz JO, Thompson LC. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
Van Vulpen M, Van Loon J, Pos F, et al. OC-0282: FLAME randomised trial: 95Gy MRI-boost vs 77Gy prostate radiotherapy: toxicity and quality of life. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119(1 Suppl):S132.
Pollack A, Walker G, Horwitz EM, Price R, Feigenberg S, Konski AA, Stoyanova R, Movsas B, Greenberg RE, Uzzo RG, Ma C, Buyyounouski MK. Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3860-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1972. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. 2016; https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2016.html. Accessed 10/03/2017.
Chism DB, Hanlon AL, Horwitz EM, Feigenberg SJ, Pollack A. A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):380-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.059.
Roach M, Lu J, Pilepich MV, Asbell SO, Mohiuddin M, Terry R, Grignon D. Four prognostic groups predict long-term survival from prostate cancer following radiotherapy alone on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jun 1;47(3):609-15. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00578-2.
D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Cote K, Loffredo M, Schultz D, Chen MH, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Wein A, Richie JP. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 2002 Jul 15;95(2):281-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10657.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer. 2017; https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/prostate.pdf. Accessed 10/03/2017.
Nguyen QN, Levy LB, Lee AK, Choi SS, Frank SJ, Pugh TJ, McGuire S, Hoffman K, Kuban DA. Long-term outcomes for men with high-risk prostate cancer treated definitively with external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation. Cancer. 2013 Sep 15;119(18):3265-71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28213. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
Spratt DE, Pei X, Yamada J, Kollmeier MA, Cox B, Zelefsky MJ. Long-term survival and toxicity in patients treated with high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
Aizer AA, Yu JB, Colberg JW, McKeon AM, Decker RH, Peschel RE. Radical prostatectomy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the management of localized prostate adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2009 Nov;93(2):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
Vora SA, Wong WW, Schild SE, Ezzell GA, Andrews PE, Ferrigni RG, Swanson SK. Outcome and toxicity for patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, Halperin R, Pai H, McKenzie M, Duncan G, Morton G, Hamm J, Murray N. Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): An Analysis of Survival Endpoints for a Randomized Trial Comparing a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost to a Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
Haustermans KM, Hofland I, Van Poppel H, Oyen R, Van de Voorde W, Begg AC, Fowler JF. Cell kinetic measurements in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Mar 15;37(5):1067-70. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00579-2.
Duchesne GM, Peters LJ. What is the alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer? Rationale for hypofractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jul 1;44(4):747-8. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00024-3. No abstract available.
Dasu A, Toma-Dasu I. Prostate alpha/beta revisited -- an analysis of clinical results from 14 168 patients. Acta Oncol. 2012 Nov;51(8):963-74. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.719635. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
Miralbell R, Roberts SA, Zubizarreta E, Hendry JH. Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5,969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: alpha/beta = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.075. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Mar 15;43(5):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00438-6.
Brenner DJ. Fractionation and late rectal toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1013-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.014. No abstract available.
Tucker SL, Thames HD, Michalski JM, Bosch WR, Mohan R, Winter K, Cox JD, Purdy JA, Dong L. Estimation of alpha/beta for late rectal toxicity based on RTOG 94-06. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.080. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
Michalski JM, Moughan J, Purdy JA, et al. Initial Results of a Phase 3 Randomized Study of High Dose 3DCRT/IMRT versus Standard Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT in Patients Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer (RTOG 0126). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(5):1263.
Beckendorf V, Guerif S, Le Prise E, Cosset JM, Bougnoux A, Chauvet B, Salem N, Chapet O, Bourdain S, Bachaud JM, Maingon P, Hannoun-Levi JM, Malissard L, Simon JM, Pommier P, Hay M, Dubray B, Lagrange JL, Luporsi E, Bey P. 70 Gy versus 80 Gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of GETUG 06 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 15;80(4):1056-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.049. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM, Thoeny HC, Verma S. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
Vargas C, Fryer A, Mahajan C, Indelicato D, Horne D, Chellini A, McKenzie C, Lawlor P, Henderson R, Li Z, Lin L, Olivier K, Keole S. Dose-volume comparison of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):744-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2335. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
Chera BS, Vargas C, Morris CG, Louis D, Flampouri S, Yeung D, Duvvuri S, Li Z, Mendenhall NP. Dosimetric study of pelvic proton radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 15;75(4):994-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.044. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
Hoppe BS, Michalski JM, Mendenhall NP, Morris CG, Henderson RH, Nichols RC, Mendenhall WM, Williams CR, Regan MM, Chipman JJ, Crociani CM, Sandler HM, Sanda MG, Hamstra DA. Comparative effectiveness study of patient-reported outcomes after proton therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28536. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
Mendenhall NP, Li Z, Hoppe BS, Marcus RB Jr, Mendenhall WM, Nichols RC, Morris CG, Williams CR, Costa J, Henderson R. Early outcomes from three prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.024. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
Slater JD, Rossi CJ Jr, Yonemoto LT, Bush DA, Jabola BR, Levy RP, Grove RI, Preston W, Slater JM. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: the initial Loma Linda University experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.011.
Liauw SL, Weichselbaum RR, Rash C, Correa D, Al-Hallaq HA, Pelizzari CA, Jani AB. Biochemical control and toxicity after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jun;8(3):201-6. doi: 10.1177/153303460900800304.
Pugh TJ, Munsell MF, Choi S, Nguyen QN, Mathai B, Zhu XR, Sahoo N, Gillin M, Johnson JL, Amos RA, Dong L, Mahmood U, Kuban DA, Frank SJ, Hoffman KE, McGuire SE, Lee AK. Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):946-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.032. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Gallina A, Suardi N, Bianchi M, Sun M, Freschi M, Salonia A, Karakiewicz PI, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
Yu JB, Makarov DV, Gross C. A new formula for prostate cancer lymph node risk. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.068. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
Eifler JB, Feng Z, Lin BM, Partin MT, Humphreys EB, Han M, Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Trock BJ, Partin AW. An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011. BJU Int. 2013 Jan;111(1):22-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11324.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
Lawton CA, DeSilvio M, Roach M 3rd, Uhl V, Kirsch R, Seider M, Rotman M, Jones C, Asbell S, Valicenti R, Hahn S, Thomas CR Jr. An update of the phase III trial comparing whole pelvic to prostate only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant to adjuvant total androgen suppression: updated analysis of RTOG 94-13, with emphasis on unexpected hormone/radiation interactions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):646-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 May 24.
Roach M 3rd, Bae K, Speight J, Wolkov HB, Rubin P, Lee RJ, Lawton C, Valicenti R, Grignon D, Pilepich MV. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):585-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9881. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
Bolla M, Van Tienhoven G, Warde P, Dubois JB, Mirimanoff RO, Storme G, Bernier J, Kuten A, Sternberg C, Billiet I, Torecilla JL, Pfeffer R, Cutajar CL, Van der Kwast T, Collette L. External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1066-73. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70223-0. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
Denham JW, Steigler A, Lamb DS, Joseph D, Turner S, Matthews J, Atkinson C, North J, Christie D, Spry NA, Tai KH, Wynne C, D'Este C. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: 10-year data from the TROG 96.01 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):451-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70063-8.
D'Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M, Renshaw AA, DellaCroce A, Kantoff PW. 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):821-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.7.821.
Horwitz EM, Bae K, Hanks GE, Porter A, Grignon DJ, Brereton HD, Venkatesan V, Lawton CA, Rosenthal SA, Sandler HM, Shipley WU. Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2497-504. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9021. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
Nabid A, Carrier N, Martin AG, Bahary JP, Lemaire C, Vass S, Bahoric B, Archambault R, Vincent F, Bettahar R, Duclos M, Garant MP, Souhami L. Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial. Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):432-441. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
Pilepich MV, Winter K, Lawton CA, Krisch RE, Wolkov HB, Movsas B, Hug EB, Asbell SO, Grignon D. Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma--long-term results of phase III RTOG 85-31. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.047.
Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, Van den Bergh AC, Oddens J, Poortmans PM, Gez E, Kil P, Akdas A, Soete G, Kariakine O, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Musat E, Pierart M, Mauer ME, Collette L; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group and Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2516-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810095.
Ghilezan MJ, Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Van Herk M, Shetty A, Sharpe MB, Zafar Jafri S, Vicini FA, Matter RC, Brabbins DS, Martinez AA. Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jun 1;62(2):406-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.017.
Padhani AR, Khoo VS, Suckling J, Husband JE, Leach MO, Dearnaley DP. Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jun 1;44(3):525-33. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00040-1.
Litzenberg DW, Balter JM, Hadley SW, Sandler HM, Willoughby TR, Kupelian PA, Levine L. Influence of intrafraction motion on margins for prostate radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 1;65(2):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.033. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
Litzenberg D, Dawson LA, Sandler H, Sanda MG, McShan DL, Ten Haken RK, Lam KL, Brock KK, Balter JM. Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Mar 1;52(3):699-703. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02654-2.
Vargas C, Yan D, Kestin LL, Krauss D, Lockman DM, Brabbins DS, Martinez AA. Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: use of dose-volume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Sep 1;63(1):141-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.017.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Contact the University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UFPTI 1712-PR11
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
OCR17697
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB201800933
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.