Comparison of 24-hours Versus 72-hours of Octreotide Infusion in Preventing Early Rebleed From Esophageal Varices

NCT ID: NCT03624517

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-19

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of 24-hour vs 72-hour octreotide infusion after variceal banding in cirrhotic patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In cirrhotic patients with bleeding esophageal varices, standard of care therapy includes administration of octreotide infusion over 72-hours and endoscopic banding of esophageal varices.

Octreotide acts to reduce the pressure in the blood vessels surrounding the liver, decreasing the propensity of bleeding from esophageal varices. The recommended duration of octreotide therapy is based largely on expert opinion, however a 72-hour duration of treatment is likely to be unnecessary and may inappropriately increase hospital and medical costs.

This study aims to determine the safety of 24-hours of octreotide infusion in patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Varices Liver Cirrhoses Bleeding Esophageal Varices Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

24-hour octreotide infusion

Patients will receive octreotide infusion over 24 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Octreotide

Intervention Type DRUG

Octreotide infusion for 24-hours in patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

72-hour octreotide infusion

Patients will receive octreotide infusion over 72 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Octreotide

Intervention Type DRUG

Octreotide infusion for 24-hours in patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Octreotide

Octreotide infusion for 24-hours in patients with bleeding esophageal varices.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult males and females who are 18 years of age or older.
2. Evidence or suspicion of upper gastrointestinal bleed (GIB)
3. Patient with known or suspected cirrhosis
4. Upper GIB secondary to bleeding esophageal varices as show by esophageal endoscopy, requiring endoscopic band ligation (EBL) at presentation
5. Willing and able to provide informed consent for study, or have a Legally authorized representative (LAR) provide consent if the patient is unable to do so

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known upper gastrointestinal malignancy
2. Bleeding from gastric varices, with or without esophageal varices
3. Use of any other endoscopic method to stop GI bleeding beyond endoscopic band ligation
4. Variceal bleeding in the last 90 days
5. History of transjugular, intrahepatic, portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or vascular decompression surgery
6. Pregnant females
7. Incarcerated individuals
8. Myocardial infarct, cerebrovascular accident, sepsis, respiratory failure, or severe intercurrent illness within the previous 6 weeks
9. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension causing esophageal varices
10. Known or suspected allergy to octreotide
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Don Rockey, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Florida Health

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Ohio state University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

The University of Texas at Austin

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Brooke Army Medical Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Allam J, De Melo S, Feagins LA, Agrawal D, Malespin M, Shuja A, Lara LF, Rockey DC. Comparison of 24 vs 72-hr octreotide infusion in acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage - A multi-center, randomized clinical trial. Am J Med Sci. 2025 Jan;369(1):71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.08.027. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 39241828 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00027015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.